Association of CDH1 -160 C → A and -347 G → GA polymorphisms and expression of E-cadherin and gastric cancer: A case-control study

被引:4
|
作者
Akcakaya, Adem [1 ]
Unver, Nurcan [2 ]
Kiris, Tugba Aydogan [3 ]
Guzel, Mehmet [4 ]
Akcakaya, Fatma Betul [5 ]
Cakmakoglu, Bedia [6 ]
Hasbahceci, Mustafa [7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Bezmialem Vakif Univ, Fac Med, Dept Gen Surg, Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Yedikule Chest Dis & Thorac Surg Training & Res H, Clin Pathol, Istanbul, Turkey
[3] Istanbul Univ, Grad Sch Sci, Istanbul, Turkey
[4] Patnos State Hosp, Clin Gen Surg, Agri, Turkey
[5] Bezmialem Vakif Univ, Fac Med, Istanbul, Turkey
[6] Istanbul Univ, Dept Mol Med, Aziz Sancar Inst Expt Med, Istanbul, Turkey
[7] Istanbul Istinye Univ, Fac Med, Dept Gen Surg, Istanbul, Turkey
[8] Ctr Acad Support & Educ, ADEM, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
CDH1; polymorphisms; E-cadherin; gastric carcinoma; immunohistochemical expression; survival; C-160A PROMOTER POLYMORPHISM; GERMLINE MUTATIONS; GENE; RISK; PATTERN;
D O I
10.47717/turkjsurg.2021.5097
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: The loss of function of the E-cadherin (CDH1) gene with -160 C -> A and -347 G -> GA polymorphisms is regarded as a critical step for gastric cancer. It was aimed to investigate possible association of these polymorphisms and immunoexpression of E-cadherin with gastric cancer. Material and Methods: Gastric adenocarcinoma patients and individuals with benign gastric pathologies were included in this case-control study. Demographic data and pathological findings were recorded. Immunohistochemical staining of E-cadherin expression and analysis of -160 C -> A and -347 G -> GA polymorphisms were done. Differences between allele frequencies of -160 C -> A and -347 G -> GA polymorphisms and expression of E-cadherin were the primary outcomes. Results: There were 78 gastric cancer patients (Group A) and 113 individuals with benign gastric pathologies (Group B). The number of male patients and mean age were higher in Group A (p< 0.001). -160 C -> A and 347 G -> GA polymorphisms and their allelic distributions showed no difference between the groups (p>0.05 for all). There was a significant association between -160 C -> A polymorphism and grade of E-cadherin expression (p=0.013). There were no significant differences between survival rates with -160 C -> A, 347 G -> GA and intensity of E-cadherin expression (p>0.05 for all). There was no significant association between -160 C -> A and -347 G -> GA polymorphisms and gastric cancer. Conclusion: There was no impact of E-cadherin expression on tumoral features and survival in gastric cancer. -160 C -> A polymorphism may influence the expression of E-cadherin in gastric cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:41 / 48
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Association of E-cadherin (CDH1) gene polymorphisms and gastric cancer risk
    Al-Moundhri, Mansour S.
    Al-Khanbashi, Manal
    Al-Kindi, Mohammed
    Al-Nabhani, Maryam
    Burney, Ikram A.
    Al-Farsi, Abdulaziz
    Al-Bahrani, Bassim
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2010, 16 (27) : 3432 - 3436
  • [2] Association of E-cadherin (CDH1) gene polymorphisms and gastric cancer risk
    Mansour S Al-Moundhri
    Manal Al-Khanbashi
    Mohammed Al-Kindi
    Maryam Al-Nabhani
    Ikram A Burney
    Abdulaziz Al-Farsi
    Bassim Al-Bahrani
    [J]. World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2010, 16 (27) : 3432 - 3436
  • [3] Correlation of-160C > A and-347GA > G polymorphisms in E-cadherin gene and gastric cancer in north of Iran
    Shekarriz, Ramin
    Alikhani, Reza
    Ghasemi, Mohaddeseh
    Navaei, Reza Alizadeh
    Hashemi-Soteh, Mohammad Bagher
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2021, 26 (01):
  • [4] CDH1 POLYMORPHISMS AND LOW EXPRESSION OF E-CADHERIN AND β-CATENIN IN COLORECTAL CANCER PATIENTS
    Martinelli, M.
    Palmieri, A.
    Rodia, M. T.
    Cura, F.
    Scapoli, L.
    Ugolini, G.
    Montroni, I.
    de Sanctis, P.
    Solmi, R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL REGULATORS AND HOMEOSTATIC AGENTS, 2015, 29 (03): : 89 - 96
  • [5] LOW EXPRESSION OF E-CADHERIN AND CDH1 VARIANTS ASSOCIATED WITH DIFFUSE GASTRIC CANCER
    Garcia-Ruvalcaba, Azaria
    Vazquez-Ibarra, Katia C.
    Magana-Torres, Maria T.
    de-la-Torre, Lourdes del C. Rizo
    Melendez-Aranda, Lennon
    Lopez-Armas, Gabriela
    Cruz-Ramos, Jose A.
    Peregrina-Sandoval, Jorge
    Espinoza-Jimenez, Esther
    Rosales-Gradilla, Maria E.
    Sanchez-Lopez, Josefina Y.
    [J]. REVISTA DE INVESTIGACION CLINICA-CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL INVESTIGATION, 2023, 75 (01): : 37 - 44
  • [6] The E-cadherin (CDH1)-160C&gt;A Polymorphism Associated with Gastric Cancer Among Asians But Not Europeans
    Wang, Qiong
    Gu, Dongying
    Wang, Meilin
    Zhang, Zhengdong
    Tang, Jinhai
    Chen, Jinfei
    [J]. DNA AND CELL BIOLOGY, 2011, 30 (06) : 395 - 400
  • [7] Association of e-cadherin gene CDH1 polymorphism-160 C/A with susceptibility to develop vitiligo
    Kubelis-Lopez, David Emmanuel
    Zapata-Salazar, Natalia Aranza
    Salinas-Santander, Mauricio Andres
    Sanchez-Dominguez, Celia Nohemi
    Morlett-Chavez, Jesus Antonio
    Ocampo-Candiani, Jorge
    [J]. ANAIS BRASILEIROS DE DERMATOLOGIA, 2023, 98 (03) : 376 - 378
  • [8] Polymorphisms in the E-cadherin (CDH1) gene promoter and the risk of bladder cancer
    Kiemeney, Lambertus A.
    van Houwelingen, Kjeld P.
    Bogaerts, Manon
    Witjes, J. Alfred
    Swinkels, Dorine W.
    den Heijer, Martin
    Franke, Barbara
    Schalken, Jack A.
    Verhaegh, Gerald W.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2006, 42 (18) : 3219 - 3227
  • [9] Polymorphisms in the E-cadherin (CDH1) gene promoter and the risk of bladder cancer
    Kiemeney, L. A. L. M.
    Van Houwelingen, K. P.
    Bogaerts, M.
    Witjes, J. A.
    Swinkels, D. W.
    Den Heijer, M.
    Franke, B.
    Schalken, J. A.
    Verhaegh, G. W.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2006, 21 : 90 - 90
  • [10] Polymorphisms in the E-cadherin (CDH1) gene promoter and the risk of bladder cancer
    Kiemeney, LA
    Van Houwelingen, KP
    Bogaerts, M
    Witjes, JA
    Swinkels, DW
    Den Heijer, M
    Franke, B
    Schalken, JA
    Verhaegh, GW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 175 (04): : 198 - 198