Orthodontic pain trajectories in adolescents: Between-subject and within-subject variability in pain perception

被引:15
|
作者
Sandhu, Satpal S. [1 ]
Leckie, George [2 ]
机构
[1] Genesis Inst Dent Sci & Res, Dept Orthodont & Dentofacial Orthoped, Ferozepur Moga Rd, Ferozepur 152002, Punjab, India
[2] Univ Bristol, Grad Sch Educ, Ctr Multilevel Modelling, Social Stat, Bristol, Avon, England
关键词
GENDER-DIFFERENCES; SEX; AGE; STIMULATION; ACTIVATION; MIXREGLS; PROGRAM; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.10.020
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Introduction: The objective of this study was to assess the effects of age, sex, and the age-sex interaction on mean pain trajectories and individual variations in the pain experienced by adolescents after orthodontic separator placement. Methods: We included 115 subjects (mean age, 14.99 years; SD, +/- 1.90 years; 56 boys, 48.7%; 59 girls, 51.3%) in this study. Orthodontic separators were placed in the mesial and distal contact points of the maxillary and mandibular first molars. A 100-mm visual analog scale was used for pain assessment at 11 prespecified times: 1 hour and 2, 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 120, and 144 hours. A mixed-effects location scale model was used for the data analysis to directly model between-subject and within-subject variabilities in pain in addition to the usual modeling of mean pain as a function of age, sex, and time. Results: Mean initial pain after 1 hour of separator placement for the 12- to 15-year-old male group was 13.52 mm on the visual analog scale, which initially increased rapidly (linear estimate, 9.16; P = 0.000; 95% confidence interval [CI], -8.65 to 9.67) but decelerated with time (quadratic estimate, -0.95; P = 0.000; 95% CI, -1.0 to -0.90), suggesting an inverted U-shaped mean pain trajectory. Age, sex, and age-sex interaction effects did not significantly influence initial pain. Compared with the 12- to 15-year-old male group, the 15- to 18-year-old female group reported the steepest rise in pain (estimate, 8.55; P = 0.00; 95% CI, 7.40 to 9.70) and, as a result, experienced the most overall pain. The 12- to 15-year-old male group reported minimum between-subjects variations (SD, +/- 4.6 mm) as well as within-subjects variations (SD, +/- 5.5 mm). The between-subjects variations were highest for the 12- to 15-year-old female group (SD, +/- 9.8 mm), whereas the within-subjects variations were highest for the 15- to 18-year-old female group (SD, +/- 10.1 mm). Conclusions: The 12- to 15-year-old boys reported the lowest mean average pain intensity and a minimum subjective variation in between-subject and within-subject variances. The 15- to 18-year-old girls experienced maximum mean pain intensity and the highest daily fluctuations in pain intensity. The 12- to 15-year-old girls were the most different from one another in their overall pain experience.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:491 / +
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Between-subject variability in the influence of mental imagery on conscious perception
    N. Dijkstra
    M. Hinne
    S. E. Bosch
    M. A. J. van Gerven
    Scientific Reports, 9
  • [32] Between-subject and within-subject statistical information in dental research (vol 79, pg 1778, 2000)
    Mancl, LA
    Leroux, BG
    DeRouen, TA
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2000, 79 (11) : 1924 - 1924
  • [33] Between-Subject and Within-Subject Variaton of Muscle Atrophy and Bone Loss in Response to Experimental Bed Rest
    Boecker, Jonas
    Schmitz, Marie-Therese
    Mittag, Uwe
    Jordan, Jens
    Rittweger, Joern
    FRONTIERS IN PHYSIOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [34] Within-subject and between-subject biological variation estimates of 21 hematological parameters in 30 healthy subjects
    Coskun, Abdurrahman
    Carobene, Anna
    Kilercik, Meltem
    Serteser, Mustafa
    Sandberg, Sverre
    Aarsand, Aasne K.
    Fernandez-Calle, Pilar
    Jonker, Niels
    Bartlett, William A.
    Diaz-Garzon, Jorge
    Huet, Sibel
    Kiziltas, Cansu
    Dalgakiran, Ilayda
    Ugur, Esra
    Unsal, Ibrahim
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2018, 56 (08) : 1309 - 1318
  • [35] Between-Subject Differences Account for More Dissociation Between Rim Area and Visual Sensitivity Than Within-Subject Fluctuations
    Marin-Franch, Ivan
    Swanson, William
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2013, 54 (15)
  • [36] FEAR OF THE CS AND THE CONTEXT IN 2-WAY AVOIDANCE-LEARNING - BETWEEN-SUBJECT AND WITHIN-SUBJECT MANIPULATIONS
    CALLEN, EJ
    ANIMAL LEARNING & BEHAVIOR, 1986, 14 (01): : 80 - 89
  • [37] DIFFERENTIAL RECALL AS A FUNCTION OF MOOD DISORDER IN CLINICALLY DEPRESSED-PATIENTS - BETWEEN-SUBJECT AND WITHIN-SUBJECT DIFFERENCES
    SLIFE, BD
    THOMPSON, LW
    MIURA, S
    SHAPIRO, JL
    JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1984, 93 (04) : 391 - 400
  • [38] WITHIN-SUBJECT AND BETWEEN-SUBJECT VARIATION IN, AND ASSOCIATIONS BETWEEN, SERUM CONCENTRATIONS AND URINARY-EXCRETION OF TESTOSTERONE AND ESTRADIOL IN CHINESE MEN
    OOI, LSM
    PANESAR, NS
    MASAREI, JRL
    CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA, 1995, 236 (01) : 87 - 92
  • [39] Fat taste in humans: Sources of within- and between-subject variability
    Running, Cordelia A.
    Mattes, Richard D.
    Tucker, Robin M.
    PROGRESS IN LIPID RESEARCH, 2013, 52 (04) : 438 - 445
  • [40] WITHIN-SUBJECT AND BETWEEN-SUBJECT BIOLOGICAL VARIATIONS OF FOLLITROPIN, LUTROPIN, TESTOSTERONE, AND SEX-HORMONE-BINDING GLOBULIN IN MEN
    VALEROPOLITI, J
    FUENTESARDERIU, X
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 1993, 39 (08) : 1723 - 1725