Efficacy and safety of different fractions in stereotactic body radiotherapy for spinal metastases: A systematic review

被引:26
|
作者
Gong, Yining [1 ]
Xu, Lingyi [2 ]
Zhuang, Hongqing [3 ]
Jiang, Liang [1 ]
Wei, Feng [1 ]
Liu, Zhongjun [1 ]
Li, Yan [1 ]
Yu, Miao [1 ]
Ni, Kaiwen [4 ]
Liu, Xiaoguang [1 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Hosp 3, Dept Orthoped, 49 North Garden Rd, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
[2] Peking Univ, Eight Year Program, Grade 2015, Hlth Sci Ctr, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Peking Univ, Hosp 3, Dept Radiat Oncol, 49 North Garden Rd, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
[4] Peking Univ, Res Ctr Clin Epidemiol, Hosp 3, Beijing, Peoples R China
来源
CANCER MEDICINE | 2019年 / 8卷 / 14期
关键词
multi-fraction; single-fraction; spinal metastases; stereotactic body radiotherapy; stereotactic radiosurgery; systematic review; RENAL-CELL CARCINOMA; RADIATION-THERAPY; SINGLE-FRACTION; CORD COMPRESSION; LOCAL FAILURE; PAIN PALLIATION; FRACTURE RISK; RADIOSURGERY; OUTCOMES; SESSION;
D O I
10.1002/cam4.2546
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background In the treatment of spinal metastases, stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) delivers precise, high-dose radiation to the target region while sparing the spinal cord. A range of doses and fractions had been reported; however, the optimal prescribed scheme remains unclear. Methods Two reviewers performed independent literature searches of the PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Database, and Web of Science databases. Articles were divided into one to five fractions groups. The Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies (MINORS) was used to assess the quality of studies. Local control (LC) and overall survival (OS) were presented for the included studies and a pooled value was calculated by the weighted average. Results The 38 included studies comprised 3,754 patients with 4,731 lesions. The average 1-year LCs for the one to five fractions were 92.7%, 84.6%, 86.8%, 82.6%, and 80.6%, respectively. The average 1-year OS for the one to five fractions were 53.0%, 70.4%, 60.1%, 48%, and 80%, respectively. The 24 Gy/single fraction scheme had a higher 1-year LC (98.1%) than those of 24 Gy/two fractions (85.4%), 27 Gy/three fractions (84.9%), and 24 Gy/three fractions (89.0%). The incidence of vertebral compression fracture was 10.3%, with 10.7% in the single-fraction group and 10.1% in the multi-fraction group. The incidence of radiation-induced myelopathy was 0.19%; three and two patients were treated with single-fraction and multi-fraction SBRT, respectively. The incidence of radiculopathy was 0.30% and all but one patient were treated with multi-fraction SBRT. Conclusions SBRT provided satisfactory efficacy and acceptable safety for spinal metastases. Single-fraction SBRT demonstrated a higher local control rate than those of the other factions, especially the 24 Gy dose. The risk of vertebral compression fracture (VCF) was slightly higher in single-fraction SBRT and more patients developed radiculopathy after multi-fraction SBRT.
引用
收藏
页码:6176 / 6184
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The efficacy and outcomes of stereotactic body radiotherapy in adrenal gland metastases
    Kekilli, Esra
    Demirkasimoglu, Taciser
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2023, 19 (SUPPL 1) : S47 - S51
  • [32] Stereotactic body radiosurgery for spinal metastases: A critical review
    Sahgal, Arjun
    Larson, David A.
    Chang, Eric L.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2008, 71 (03): : 652 - 665
  • [33] Long-term safety and efficacy of fractionated stereotactic body radiation therapy for spinal metastases
    Mantel, Frederick
    Glatz, Stefan
    Toussaint, Andre
    Flentje, Michael
    Guckenberger, Matthias
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2014, 190 (12) : 1141 - 1148
  • [34] The Efficacy of External Beam Radiotherapy and Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) for Painful Spinal Metastases front Renal Cell Carcinoma
    Hunter, G. K.
    Balagamwala, E. H.
    Koyfman, S. A.
    Bledsoe, T.
    Reddy, C. A.
    Djemil, T.
    Chao, S. T.
    Angelov, L.
    Videtic, G. M. M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2011, 81 (02): : S649 - S650
  • [35] Assessing treatment response following stereotactic body radiotherapy for spinal metastases
    Roth, Steven G.
    Chambless, Lola B.
    NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2022, 53 (05)
  • [36] STEREOTACTIC BODY RADIOTHERAPY FOR BREAST CANCER SPINAL METASTASES IS ASSOCIATED WITH LOW
    Thomsen, Bryce
    Vesprini, Danny
    Zeng, Liang
    Myrehaug, Sten
    Tseng, Chai-lin
    Detsky, Jay
    Chen, Hanbo
    Zhang, Beibei
    Jerzak, Katarzyna
    Atenafu, Eshetu
    Maralani, Pejman
    Soliman, Hany
    Sahgal, Arjun
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2023, 186 : S6 - S7
  • [37] Clinical Outcomes of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Spinal Metastases with Paraspinal Extension
    Vuppala, N.
    LeCompte, M. C.
    Bydon, A.
    Kebaish, K.
    Theodore, N.
    Wu, B.
    Khan, M.
    Kleinberg, L. R.
    Lee, S. H.
    Lubelski, D.
    Redmond, K. J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2024, 120 (02): : E283 - E283
  • [38] Vertebral compression fracture after stereotactic body radiotherapy for spinal metastases
    Sahgal, Arjun
    Whyne, Cari M.
    Ma, Lijun
    Larson, David A.
    Fehlings, Michael G.
    LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2013, 14 (08): : E310 - E320
  • [39] Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Spinal Metastases: Practice Guidelines, Outcomes, and Risks
    Jabbari, Siavash
    Gerszten, Peter C.
    Ruschin, Mark
    Larson, David A.
    Lo, Simon S.
    Sahgal, Arjun
    CANCER JOURNAL, 2016, 22 (04): : 280 - 289
  • [40] Efficacy and Safety of Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Brainstem Metastases A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Chen, William C.
    Baal, Ulysis H.
    Baal, Joe D.
    Pai, Jon S.
    Boreta, Lauren
    Braunstein, Steve E.
    Raleigh, David R.
    JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2021, 7 (07) : 1033 - 1040