Efficacy and safety of different fractions in stereotactic body radiotherapy for spinal metastases: A systematic review

被引:26
|
作者
Gong, Yining [1 ]
Xu, Lingyi [2 ]
Zhuang, Hongqing [3 ]
Jiang, Liang [1 ]
Wei, Feng [1 ]
Liu, Zhongjun [1 ]
Li, Yan [1 ]
Yu, Miao [1 ]
Ni, Kaiwen [4 ]
Liu, Xiaoguang [1 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Hosp 3, Dept Orthoped, 49 North Garden Rd, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
[2] Peking Univ, Eight Year Program, Grade 2015, Hlth Sci Ctr, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Peking Univ, Hosp 3, Dept Radiat Oncol, 49 North Garden Rd, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
[4] Peking Univ, Res Ctr Clin Epidemiol, Hosp 3, Beijing, Peoples R China
来源
CANCER MEDICINE | 2019年 / 8卷 / 14期
关键词
multi-fraction; single-fraction; spinal metastases; stereotactic body radiotherapy; stereotactic radiosurgery; systematic review; RENAL-CELL CARCINOMA; RADIATION-THERAPY; SINGLE-FRACTION; CORD COMPRESSION; LOCAL FAILURE; PAIN PALLIATION; FRACTURE RISK; RADIOSURGERY; OUTCOMES; SESSION;
D O I
10.1002/cam4.2546
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background In the treatment of spinal metastases, stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) delivers precise, high-dose radiation to the target region while sparing the spinal cord. A range of doses and fractions had been reported; however, the optimal prescribed scheme remains unclear. Methods Two reviewers performed independent literature searches of the PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Database, and Web of Science databases. Articles were divided into one to five fractions groups. The Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies (MINORS) was used to assess the quality of studies. Local control (LC) and overall survival (OS) were presented for the included studies and a pooled value was calculated by the weighted average. Results The 38 included studies comprised 3,754 patients with 4,731 lesions. The average 1-year LCs for the one to five fractions were 92.7%, 84.6%, 86.8%, 82.6%, and 80.6%, respectively. The average 1-year OS for the one to five fractions were 53.0%, 70.4%, 60.1%, 48%, and 80%, respectively. The 24 Gy/single fraction scheme had a higher 1-year LC (98.1%) than those of 24 Gy/two fractions (85.4%), 27 Gy/three fractions (84.9%), and 24 Gy/three fractions (89.0%). The incidence of vertebral compression fracture was 10.3%, with 10.7% in the single-fraction group and 10.1% in the multi-fraction group. The incidence of radiation-induced myelopathy was 0.19%; three and two patients were treated with single-fraction and multi-fraction SBRT, respectively. The incidence of radiculopathy was 0.30% and all but one patient were treated with multi-fraction SBRT. Conclusions SBRT provided satisfactory efficacy and acceptable safety for spinal metastases. Single-fraction SBRT demonstrated a higher local control rate than those of the other factions, especially the 24 Gy dose. The risk of vertebral compression fracture (VCF) was slightly higher in single-fraction SBRT and more patients developed radiculopathy after multi-fraction SBRT.
引用
收藏
页码:6176 / 6184
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Stereotactic body radiotherapy for de novo spinal metastases: systematic review
    Husain, Zain A.
    Sahgal, Arjun
    De Salles, Antonio
    Funaro, Melissa
    Glover, Janis
    Hayashi, Motohiro
    Hiraoka, Masahiro
    Levivier, Marc
    Ma, Lijun
    Martinez-Alvarez, Roberto
    Paddick, J. Ian
    Regis, Jean
    Slotman, Ben J.
    Ryu, Samuel
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2017, 27 (03) : 295 - 302
  • [2] Stereotactic body radiotherapy for spinal metastases: a review
    Lanlan Guo
    Lixin Ke
    Ziyi Zeng
    Chuanping Yuan
    Ziwei Wu
    Lei Chen
    Lixia Lu
    Medical Oncology, 39
  • [3] Stereotactic body radiotherapy for spinal metastases: a review
    Guo, Lanlan
    Ke, Lixin
    Zeng, Ziyi
    Yuan, Chuanping
    Wu, Ziwei
    Chen, Lei
    Lu, Lixia
    MEDICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 39 (05)
  • [4] Systematic review of stereotactic body radiotherapy for nodal metastases
    Deodato, Francesco
    Macchia, Gabriella
    Buwenge, Milly
    Bonetti, Mattia
    Cilla, Savino
    Zamagni, Alice
    Re, Alessia
    Pezzulla, Donato
    Cellini, Francesco
    Strigari, Lidia
    Valentini, Vincenzo
    Morganti, Alessio G.
    CLINICAL & EXPERIMENTAL METASTASIS, 2021, 38 (01) : 11 - 29
  • [5] Systematic review of stereotactic body radiotherapy for nodal metastases
    Francesco Deodato
    Gabriella Macchia
    Milly Buwenge
    Mattia Bonetti
    Savino Cilla
    Alice Zamagni
    Alessia Re
    Donato Pezzulla
    Francesco Cellini
    Lidia Strigari
    Vincenzo Valentini
    Alessio G. Morganti
    Clinical & Experimental Metastasis, 2021, 38 : 11 - 29
  • [6] Stereotactic body radiotherapy for painful spinal metastases
    Sahgal, Arjun
    Brundage, Michael
    Ding, Keyue
    Parulekar, Wendy R.
    LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2021, 22 (09): : E385 - E385
  • [7] Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) for Spinal Metastases
    Kretzler, A. E.
    Bassetti, M.
    Balter, J. M.
    Tsien, C. I.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2009, 75 (03): : S504 - S504
  • [8] Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Spinal and Bone Metastases
    Bhattacharya, I. S.
    Hoskin, P. J.
    CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 27 (05) : 298 - 306
  • [9] Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) for Spinal Metastases
    Ferrario, F.
    Torrisi, M.
    Chissotti, C.
    Giannini, L.
    Deantoni, C. L.
    Broggi, S.
    Midulla, M.
    Villa, S. L.
    Dell'Oca, I.
    Fodor, A.
    Fiorino, C.
    Del Vecchio, A.
    Arcangeli, S.
    Di Muzio, N. G.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2023, 182 : S1295 - S1296
  • [10] Stereotactic body radiotherapy for the treatment of spinal metastases
    Balagamwala, Ehsan H.
    Cherian, Sheen
    Angelov, Lilyana
    Suh, John H.
    Djemil, Toufik
    Lo, Simon S.
    Sahgal, Arjun
    Chang, Eric
    Teh, Bin S.
    Chao, Samuel T.
    JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2012, 1 (03) : 255 - 265