Presence and Platform: Effects of Embodiment Comparing a 2D Computer and 3D VR Game

被引:0
|
作者
Kalina, Elena [1 ]
Johnson-Glenberg, Mina C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Arizona Sate Univ, Dept Psychol, Tempe, AZ 85281 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
presence; embodiment; education; virtual reality; mixed reality; natural selection; STEM in VR; VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENTS;
D O I
10.23919/ilrn47897.2020.9155160
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
This randomized control study focused on how presence - the feeling of being there - is affected by the two factors of 1) embodiment (low versus high) and 2) learning platform (2D PC versus 3D Virtual Reality (VR)). Embodiment was deemed low if participants watched playbacks of the natural selection game in action, and it was deemed high if players used a physical gesture, either with a mouse or the VR hand control to manipulate the content. Two dependent variables of presence and engagement were assessed. The 147 participants were randomly assigned. Overall, those in the high embodiment conditions report higher presence, and overall those in the VR platform report higher presence. However, pairwise analyses showed that the high embodied PC group reported more presence than the low embodied VR group. This suggests that 'platform is not destiny'. If an educational game or application is not one that gives the learner control and agency, then both presence and engagement will be diminished.
引用
收藏
页码:31 / 37
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] 2D or 3D?
    Mills, R
    COMPUTER-AIDED ENGINEERING, 1996, 15 (08): : 4 - 4
  • [22] 2D and 3D computer graphics algorithms under MorphoSys
    Damaj, I
    Majzoub, S
    Diab, H
    FIELD-PROGRAMMABLE LOGIC AND APPLICATIONS, PROCEEDINGS: RECONFIGURABLE COMPUTING IS GOING MAINSTREAM, 2002, 2438 : 1076 - 1079
  • [23] Comparing 2D and 3D game-based learning environments in terms of learning gains and student perceptions
    Ak, Oguz
    Kutlu, Birgul
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 48 (01) : 129 - 144
  • [24] 2D or not 2D That is the Question, but 3D is the, answer
    Cronin, Paul
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2007, 14 (07) : 769 - 771
  • [25] Comparing 2D and 3D Solar Radiation Modeling in Urban Areas
    Kolecansky, Stefan
    Hofierka, Jaroslav
    Boglarsky, Jozef
    Supinsky, Jozef
    ENERGIES, 2021, 14 (24)
  • [26] Scenes in the Human Brain: Comparing 2D versus 3D Representations
    Groen, Iris I. A.
    Baker, Chris I.
    NEURON, 2019, 101 (01) : 8 - 10
  • [27] Comparing 2D and 3D Digital Image Correlation for an Inflation Test
    Murienne, Barbara J.
    Nguyen, Thao D.
    MECHANICS OF BIOLOGICAL SYSTEMS AND MATER IALS, VOL 6, 2016, : 61 - 67
  • [28] The INVENIO Platform for 2D/3D Content Re-use
    Zaharia, Titus
    Laquet, Thomas
    Vaucelle, Alain
    Preteux, Francoise
    IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONSUMER ELECTRONICS (ICCE 2011), 2011, : 83 - +
  • [29] 2D and 3D virtual interactive laboratories of physics on Unity platform
    Gonzalez, J. D.
    Escobar, J. H.
    Sanchez, H.
    De la Hoz, J.
    Beltran, J. A.
    4TH INTERNATIONAL MEETING FOR RESEARCHERS IN MATERIALS AND PLASMA TECHNOLOGY (4TH IMRMPT), 2017, 935
  • [30] 3D and 2D/3D holograms model
    A. A. Boriskevich
    V. K. Erohovets
    V. V. Tkachenko
    Optical Memory and Neural Networks, 2012, 21 (4) : 242 - 248