Evaluation of CD56 and CD57 immunostainings for discrimination between endocrine ductal carcinoma in situ and intraductal papilloma

被引:8
|
作者
Tajima, Shinya [1 ,2 ]
Maeda, Ichiro [1 ]
Kanemaki, Yoshihide [2 ]
Nakajima, Yasuo [2 ]
Tatsunami, Shinobu [3 ]
Fukuda, Mamoru [4 ]
Takagi, Masayuki [1 ]
机构
[1] St Marianna Univ, Sch Med, Dept Diagnost Pathol, Fac Educ & Culture, Kanagawa, Japan
[2] St Marianna Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Fac Educ & Culture, Kanagawa, Japan
[3] St Marianna Univ, Sch Med, Med Stat Unit, Fac Educ & Culture, Kanagawa, Japan
[4] St Marianna Univ, Sch Med, Dept Breast & Endocrine Surg, Kanagawa, Japan
关键词
CD56; CD57; endocrine-ductal carcinoma in situ (E-DCIS); intraductal papilloma; neuroendocrine; MYELIN-ASSOCIATED GLYCOPROTEIN; CELL-ADHESION MOLECULE; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL ANALYSIS; NEUROENDOCRINE CELLS; BREAST; BENIGN; TUMORS; DIFFERENTIATION; LESIONS; MARKER;
D O I
10.1111/j.1440-1827.2010.02544.x
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
Endocrine ductal carcinoma in situ (E-DCIS) is an intraductal carcinoma characterized by endocrine features and expression of neuroendocrine markers. E-DCIS and intraductal papilloma (IDP) resemble in their clinical features. However, the former is an intraductal carcinoma, and the latter is an intraductal benign lesion. It is sometimes difficult to distinguish E-DCIS from IDP because both can show near solid intraductal cellular proliferation. Discrimination between lesions is important not only histopathologically, but also clinically. This study aimed to evaluate the applicability of CD56 and CD57 for the discrimination between E-DCIS and IDP. Specimens were obtained from 17 E-DCIS patients as the subject group, and 27 IDP patients as the control group, diagnosed in St Marianna University Hospital. E-DCIS was diagnosed using Chromogranin A, Synaptophysin, and Grimelius stainings by the premise of histopathological features. These specimens were subjected to CD56, CD57 immunostainings. Staining results were compared between E-DCIS and IDP. In our study, CD56 revealed significant differences for distinguishing E-DCIS from IDP as determined by Fisher's test (cutoff: not less than 33-67%< immunopositivity, P < 0.05). We found that not only E-DCIS but also IDP revealed immunopositivity for CD56. However, it is considered that E-DCIS diagnosis is possible by diffuse immunopositivity of CD56 after having been based on histopathology.
引用
收藏
页码:459 / 465
页数:7
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [21] Autocrine IL-2-dependent growth of a newly established CD3(+), CD16(-), CD56(+), CD57(+), J(H)(-), TCR beta(-), TCR gamma(-) leukemia cell line (NOI-90)
    Sahraoui, Y
    Perraki, M
    Theodoropoulou, M
    Allouche, M
    Tsapis, A
    Ammar, A
    Clemenceau, C
    Bokogiorgou, S
    Yacci, T
    KAtrinakis, G
    Jasmin, C
    Georgoulias, V
    LEUKEMIA, 1997, 11 (02) : 245 - 252
  • [22] CD56, CD57, HBME1, CK19, GALECTIN-3 AND P63 IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL STAINS IN DIFFERENTIATING DIAGNOSIS OF THYROID BENIGN/MALIGN LESIONS AND NIFTP
    Tastekin, Ebru
    Keskin, Elif Usturali
    Can, Nuray
    Canberk, Sule
    Mut, Ayse Nur Usturali
    Erdogan, Ezgi Genc
    Asa, Nurtac
    Guldiken, Sibel
    Sezer, Atakan
    Azatcam, Meltem
    POLISH JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 2019, 70 (04) : 286 - 294
  • [23] MOST CD8+ CELLS IN SKIN-LESIONS OF CD3+CD4+ MYCOSIS-FUNGOIDES ARE CD3+ T-CELLS THAT LACK CD11B, CD16, CD56, CD57, AND HUMAN HANUKAH FACTOR MESSENGER-RNA
    WOOD, GS
    DUBIEL, C
    MUELLER, C
    ABEL, EA
    HOPPE, RT
    EDINGER, A
    WEISSMAN, I
    WARNKE, RA
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 1991, 138 (06): : 1545 - 1552
  • [24] A Comparison of GI vs None GI Granular Cell Tumors and Reactive Schwann Cell Processes by a Panel of IHC Stains (MITF, S100, CD56, CD57, CD117, Calretinin, EMA, CD68, and Ki 67)
    Al Diffalha, Sameer
    Chen, Hayian
    Atieh, Mohammad
    Daniel, Silver
    Pambuccian, Stefan
    Yong, Sherri
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2014, 142
  • [25] Impaired natural killer cell responses are associated with loss of the highly activated NKG2AR CD57 R CD56 dim subset in HIV-1 subtype D infection in Uganda
    Naluyima, Prossy
    Eller, Michael A.
    Laeyendecker, Oliver
    Quinn, Thomas C.
    Serwadda, David
    Sewankambo, Nelson K.
    Gray, Ronald H.
    Michael, Nelson L.
    Wabwire-Mangen, Fred
    Robb, Merlin L.
    Sandberg, Johan K.
    AIDS, 2014, 28 (09) : 1273 - 1278
  • [26] Combined evaluation of CK5/6, ER, p63, and MUC3 for distinguishing breast intraductal papilloma from ductal carcinoma in situ
    Furuya, Chiemi
    Kawano, Hiroo
    Yamanouchi, Tsuyoshi
    Oga, Atsunori
    Ueda, Junko
    Takahashi, Mutsuo
    PATHOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 62 (06) : 381 - 390
  • [27] Immunocytochemical analysis of p63 and 34E12 in fine needle aspiration cytology specimens for breast lesions: a potentially useful discriminatory marker between intraductal papilloma and ductal carcinoma in situ
    Hoshikawa, S.
    Sano, T.
    Hirato, J.
    Oyama, T.
    Fukuda, T.
    CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2016, 27 (02) : 108 - 114