The role of pupil size in communication. Is there room for learning?

被引:29
|
作者
Kret, Mariska E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, Cognit Psychol Unit, Leiden, Netherlands
关键词
Affect; developmental psychology; communicative eyes; eye signals; emotional expression; pupil size; AGE; CONTAGION; DIAMETER; AMYGDALA; SADNESS; AROUSAL; TRUST;
D O I
10.1080/02699931.2017.1370417
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The eyes are extremely important for communication. The muscles around the eyes express emotional states and the size of the pupil signals whether a person is aroused and alert or bored and fatigued. Pupil size is an overlooked social signal, yet is readily picked up by observers. Observers mirror their own pupil sizes in response, which can influence social impressions. In a landmark study by Hess [1975. The role of pupil size in communication. Scientific American, 233(5), 110-119] it was shown that individuals with large pupils are perceived more positively than individuals with small pupils. In that behavioral study, participants were asked to draw pupils in line drawings of faces with empty irises and they drew large pupils in the happy face, and small ones in the angry face. The current study tested 579 participants (aged 4-80 years old) and extended this work by showing that this association between large (small) pupils and a positive (negative) impression develops over age and is absent in children. Several explanations for how individuals through interactions with close others learn that large pupils mean care, interest and attention and small pupils the opposite, are discussed. To conclude, this study shows that pupil size and emotion perception are intertwined but that their relationship develops over age.
引用
收藏
页码:1139 / 1145
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The optical role of pupil size in eye growth and emmetropia
    Vohnsen, Brian
    Martins, Alessandra Marie Carmichael
    Sharmin, Najnin
    Qaysi, Salihah
    Rodriguez, Martin Isaias Rodriguez
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2019, 60 (09)
  • [42] An Ethics of Science Communication.
    Nielsen, Kristian H.
    PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE, 2020, 29 (06) : 667 - 668
  • [43] Commentary on the previous communication.
    Deslandres, H
    COMPTES RENDUS HEBDOMADAIRES DES SEANCES DE L ACADEMIE DES SCIENCES, 1920, 171 : 572 - 573
  • [44] Optical Proximity Communication.
    Shubin, Ivan
    Cunningham, John E.
    Zheng, Xuezhe
    Simons, John
    Feng, Dazeng
    Liang, Hong
    Kung, Cheng-Chih
    Asghari, Mehdi
    Krishnamoorthy, Ashok V.
    OPTOELECTRONIC INTEGRATED CIRCUITS XI, 2009, 7219
  • [45] Assessment as a form of communication.
    Lewis, EL
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2003, 225 : U416 - U416
  • [46] Technology and scholarly communication.
    Oppenheim, C
    JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, 2001, 57 (04) : 570 - 570
  • [47] PROGRAMS INTECHNICAL COMMUNICATION.
    Storms, C.Gilbert
    Technical Communication, 1984, 31 (04) : 13 - 20
  • [48] Surgery on the lines of communication.
    不详
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1917, 1917 : 816 - 816
  • [49] Translation in intercultural communication.
    Xu, JZ
    PERSPECTIVES-STUDIES IN TRANSLATOLOGY, 2004, 12 (02): : 151 - 152
  • [50] MICROPROCESSORS IN DATA COMMUNICATION.
    Joshi, C.P.
    IETE Journal of Research, 1983, 29 (12) : 606 - 607