Use of meteorological models as input to regional and mesoscale air quality models - Limitations and strengths

被引:118
|
作者
Pielke, RA [1 ]
Uliasz, M
机构
[1] Colorado State Univ, Dept Atmospher Sci, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[2] Mission Res Corp, ASTeR div, Ft Collins, CO 80526 USA
关键词
dispersion; long-range transport; terrain-induced; mesoscale modeling; boundary layer;
D O I
10.1016/S1352-2310(97)00140-4
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The importance of meteorological variability and uncertainty is described and discussed in the context of dispersion and chemistry of air pollution. Synoptic, mesoscale, and turbulent scales are defined in relation to pollution dilution. Spatial variability effects due, for example, to synoptic baroclinicity, propagating synoptic and mesoscale features, and surface-forced atmospheric circulations are described. Temporal variability resulting from diurnal and seasonal effects are discussed and examples presented. Among the questions addressed is the importance of differential advection relative to horizontal diffusion at different space and time scales. The concept of delayed diffusion is presented. Among the conclusions is that regulating agencies such as the EPA and NPS have generally not taken sufficient advantage of regional and mesoscale meteorological model-generated wind and turbulence fields, nor used the limits on the accuracy of these models to provide an upper limit to the skill of air quality models. Part of this failure is due to the poor communication by scientific researchers, of model capabilities and limits to the agencies and other users of meteorological model output as part of air quality assessments. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1455 / 1466
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] EMISSIONS MODELS FOR REGIONAL AIR-QUALITY STUDIES
    DICKSON, RJ
    OLIVER, WR
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 1991, 25 (09) : 1533 - 1535
  • [32] Evaluating regional-scale air quality models
    Gilliland, Alice B.
    Godowitch, James M.
    Hogrefe, Christian
    Rao, S. T.
    AIR POLLUTION MODELING AND ITS APPLICATION XIX, 2008, : 412 - 419
  • [33] EVALUATION OF 3 REGIONAL AIR-QUALITY MODELS
    RUFF, RE
    NITZ, KC
    LUDWIG, FL
    BHUMRALKAR, CM
    SHANNON, JD
    SHEIH, CM
    LEE, IY
    KUMAR, R
    MCNAUGHTON, DJ
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1985, 19 (07) : 1103 - 1115
  • [34] Assimilation of satellite data in regional air quality models
    McNider, RT
    Norris, WB
    Casey, DM
    Pleim, JE
    Roselle, SJ
    Lapenta, WM
    AIR POLLUTION MODELING AND ITS APPLICATION XII, 1998, 22 : 25 - 35
  • [35] Evaluation of Regional Air Quality Models over Sydney and Australia: Part 1-Meteorological Model Comparison
    Monk, Khalia
    Guerette, Elise-Andree
    Paton-Walsh, Clare
    Silver, Jeremy D.
    Emmerson, Kathryn M.
    Utembe, Steven R.
    Zhang, Yang
    Griffiths, Alan D.
    Chang, Lisa T. -C.
    Duc, Hiep N.
    Toan Trieu
    Scorgie, Yvonne
    Cope, Martin E.
    ATMOSPHERE, 2019, 10 (07)
  • [36] REGIONAL PATTERNS OF MIXING DEPTH AND STABILITY - SODAR NETWORK MEASUREMENTS FOR INPUT TO AIR-QUALITY MODELS
    RUSSELL, PB
    UTHE, EE
    BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 1978, 59 (10) : 1275 - 1287
  • [37] Strengths and weaknesses of the FAIRMODE benchmarking methodology for the evaluation of air quality models
    A. Monteiro
    P. Durka
    C. Flandorfer
    E. Georgieva
    C. Guerreiro
    J. Kushta
    L. Malherbe
    B. Maiheu
    A. I. Miranda
    G. Santos
    J. Stocker
    E. Trimpeneers
    F. Tognet
    M. Stortini
    J. Wesseling
    S. Janssen
    P. Thunis
    Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health, 2018, 11 : 373 - 383
  • [38] Strengths and weaknesses of the FAIRMODE benchmarking methodology for the evaluation of air quality models
    Monteiro, A.
    Durka, P.
    Flandorfer, C.
    Georgieva, E.
    Guerreiro, C.
    Kushta, J.
    Malherbe, L.
    Maiheu, B.
    Miranda, A., I
    Santos, G.
    Stocker, J.
    Trimpeneers, E.
    Tognet, F.
    Stortini, M.
    Wesseling, J.
    Janssen, S.
    Thunis, P.
    AIR QUALITY ATMOSPHERE AND HEALTH, 2018, 11 (04): : 373 - 383
  • [39] Use of CALPUFF and CAMx models in regional air quality planning: Italy case studies
    Trozzi, C.
    Villa, S.
    Piscitello, E.
    AIR POLLUTION XVII, 2009, 123 : 17 - 25
  • [40] Pattern-Based Evaluation of Coupled Meteorological and Air Quality Models
    Beaver, Scott
    Tanrikulu, Saffet
    Palazoglu, Ahmet
    Singh, Angadh
    Soong, Su-Tzai
    Jia, Yiqin
    Tran, Cuong
    Ainslie, Bruce
    Steyn, Douw G.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED METEOROLOGY AND CLIMATOLOGY, 2010, 49 (10) : 2077 - 2091