The influence of attention and reward on the learning of stimulus-response associations

被引:12
|
作者
Vartak, Devavrat [1 ]
Jeurissen, Danique [1 ,4 ]
Self, Matthew W. [1 ]
Roelfsema, Pieter R. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Royal Netherlands Acad Arts & Sci, Netherlands Inst Neurosci, Dept Vis & Cognit, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Dept Integrat Neurophysiol, Ctr Neurogen & Cognit Res, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Acad Med Ctr, Dept Psychiat, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Columbia Univ, Dept Neurosci, Zuckerman Mind Brain Behav Inst, New York, NY USA
来源
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS | 2017年 / 7卷
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
SELECTION; DOPAMINE;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-017-08200-w
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
We can learn new tasks by listening to a teacher, but we can also learn by trial-and-error. Here, we investigate the factors that determine how participants learn new stimulus-response mappings by trial-and-error. Does learning in human observers comply with reinforcement learning theories, which describe how subjects learn from rewards and punishments? If yes, what is the influence of selective attention in the learning process? We developed a novel redundant-relevant learning paradigm to examine the conjoint influence of attention and reward feedback. We found that subjects only learned stimulus-response mappings for attended shapes, even when unattended shapes were equally informative. Reward magnitude also influenced learning, an effect that was stronger for attended than for non-attended shapes and that carried over to a subsequent visual search task. Our results provide insights into how attention and reward jointly determine how we learn. They support the powerful learning rules that capitalize on the conjoint influence of these two factors on neuronal plasticity.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Implicit sequence learning is represented by stimulus-response rules
    Schwarb, Hillary
    Schumacher, Eric H.
    MEMORY & COGNITION, 2010, 38 (06) : 677 - 688
  • [42] Priming and stimulus-response learning in perceptual classification tasks
    Soldan, Anja
    Clarke, Benjamin
    Colleran, Christopher
    Kuras, Yuliya
    MEMORY, 2012, 20 (04) : 400 - 413
  • [43] The Influence of Event Segmentation by Context on Stimulus-Response Binding
    Qiu, Ruyi
    Moeller, Malte
    Koch, Iring
    Frings, Christian
    Mayr, Susanne
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2023, 49 (03) : 355 - 369
  • [44] Cortical plasticity of spatial stimulus-response associations:: electrophysiological and behavioral evidence
    Angrilli, A
    Zorzi, M
    Tagliabue, M
    Stegagno, L
    Umiltà, C
    NEUROREPORT, 2001, 12 (05) : 973 - 977
  • [45] Changes in Corticostriatal Connectivity Underlie the Strengthening of Stimulus-Response Associations in Humans
    Horga, Guillermo
    BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2013, 73 (09) : 12S - 12S
  • [46] Effects of Probabilistic Stimulus-Response Associations on Motion Direction Categorization Tasks
    Genova, Bilyana Zaharieva
    Stefanov, Simeon Stefanov
    Stefanova, Miroslava Dimitrova
    Bocheva, Nadejda Bogdanova
    PERCEPTION, 2019, 48 : 215 - 215
  • [47] Defining stimulus representation in stimulus-response associations formed on the basis of task execution and verbal codes
    Pfeuffer, Christina U.
    Hosp, Theresa
    Kimmig, Eva
    Moutsopoulou, Karolina
    Waszak, Florian
    Kiesel, Andrea
    PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH-PSYCHOLOGISCHE FORSCHUNG, 2018, 82 (04): : 744 - 758
  • [48] The role of the human prefrontal cortex in stimulus-response reversal learning
    Hodgson, TL
    Parris, BA
    Thai, NJ
    Summers, IR
    JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2005, : 87 - 87
  • [49] Cognitive control controls the effect of irrelevant stimulus-response learning
    Shi, Kangyin
    Wang, Ling
    ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2024, 86 (03) : 866 - 882
  • [50] Pramipexole Impairs Stimulus-Response Learning in Healthy Young Adults
    Gallant, Haley
    Vo, Andrew
    Seergobin, Ken N.
    MacDonald, Penny A.
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 2016, 10