Association of the circadian factor Period 2 to p53 influences p53's function in DNA-damage signaling

被引:49
|
作者
Gotoh, Tetsuya [1 ]
Vila-Caballer, Marian [1 ]
Liu, Jingjing [1 ]
Schiffhauer, Samuel [1 ]
Finkielstein, Carla V. [1 ]
机构
[1] Virginia Polytech Inst & State Univ, Dept Biol Sci, Integrated Cellular Responses Lab, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
TUMOR SUPPRESSION; CLOCK; GENE; COMPONENT; MUTATION; PROTEIN; DEGRADATION; EXPRESSION; PLAYS; BMAL1;
D O I
10.1091/mbc.E14-05-0994
中图分类号
Q2 [细胞生物学];
学科分类号
071009 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Circadian period proteins influence cell division and death by associating with checkpoint components, although their mode of regulation has not been firmly established. hPer2 forms a trimeric complex with hp53 and its negative regulator Mdm2. In unstressed cells, this association leads to increased hp53 stability by blocking Mdm2-dependent ubiquitination and transcription of hp53 target genes. Because of the relevance of hp53 in checkpoint signaling, we hypothesize that hPer2 association with hp53 acts as a regulatory module that influences hp53's downstream response to genotoxic stress. Unlike the trimeric complex, whose distribution was confined to the nuclear compartment, hPer2/hp53 was identified in both cytosol and nucleus. At the transcriptional level, a reporter containing the hp21(WAF1/CIP1) promoter, a target of hp53, remained inactive in cells expressing a stable form of the hPer2/hp53 complex even when treated with gamma-radiation. Finally, we established that hPer2 directly acts on the hp53 node, as checkpoint components upstream of hp53 remained active in response to DNA damage. Quantitative transcriptional analyses of hp53 target genes demonstrated that unbound hp53 was absolutely required for activation of the DNA-damage response. Our results provide evidence of the mode by which the circadian tumor suppressor hPer2 modulates hp53 signaling in response to genotoxic stress.
引用
收藏
页码:359 / 372
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] p53's Extended Reach: The Mutant p53 Secretome
    Pavlakis, Evangelos
    Stiewe, Thorsten
    BIOMOLECULES, 2020, 10 (02)
  • [42] P53 α-helix mimetics antagonize p53/MDM2 interaction and activate p53
    Chen, LH
    Yin, H
    Farooqi, B
    Sebti, S
    Hamilton, AD
    Chen, JD
    MOLECULAR CANCER THERAPEUTICS, 2005, 4 (06) : 1019 - 1025
  • [43] In vivo p53 function is indispensable for DNA damage-induced apoptotic signaling in Drosophila
    Lee, JH
    Lee, E
    Park, J
    Kim, E
    Kim, J
    Chung, J
    FEBS LETTERS, 2003, 550 (1-3) : 5 - 10
  • [44] Small molecule RITA binds to p53, blocks p53–HDM-2 interaction and activates p53 function in tumors
    Natalia Issaeva
    Przemyslaw Bozko
    Martin Enge
    Marina Protopopova
    Lisette G G C Verhoef
    Maria Masucci
    Aladdin Pramanik
    Galina Selivanova
    Nature Medicine, 2004, 10 : 1321 - 1328
  • [45] Signaling to p53: Breaking the MDM2-p53 circuit
    Prives, C
    CELL, 1998, 95 (01) : 5 - 8
  • [46] How P53 is activated following DNA damage
    Frankish, H
    LANCET, 2001, 357 (9271): : 1857 - 1857
  • [47] The role of P53 in DNA damage response and apoptosis
    Oren, M
    Lidor, E
    Minsky, N
    Stambolsky, P
    Taplick, J
    Wang, XJ
    Weisz, L
    Zalcenstein, A
    Rotter, V
    TOXICOLOGY AND APPLIED PHARMACOLOGY, 2004, 197 (03) : 166 - 167
  • [48] The role of DNA damage responses in p53 biology
    Speidel, Daniel
    ARCHIVES OF TOXICOLOGY, 2015, 89 (04) : 501 - 517
  • [49] ARSENITE INTERFERES WITH P53 RESPONSE TO DNA DAMAGE
    Zhang, Jiang Lin
    Huang, Ye Lin
    Dibble, Christian
    McHenry, Kevin
    Kim, Mihee
    Yuan, Zhi Min
    CELL BIOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2008, 32 (03) : S39 - S39
  • [50] Regulation of the DNA Damage Response by p53 Cofactors
    Zhang, Xiao-Peng
    Liu, Feng
    Wang, Wei
    BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 102 (10) : 2251 - 2260