Perceptions and risk behaviors regarding biological invasions in inland aquatic ecosystems

被引:6
|
作者
Banha, Filipe [1 ]
Diniz, Antonio M. [2 ]
del Amo, Rosa Olivo [3 ]
Oliva-Paterna, Franscisco J. [3 ]
Anastacio, Pedro M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Evora, MARE Marine & Environm Sci Ctr, Dept Paisagem Ambiente & Ordenamento, Escola Ciencias & Tecnol, Evora, Portugal
[2] Univ Evora, Dept Psicol, Escola Ciencias Sociais, Evora, Portugal
[3] Univ Murcia, Dept Zool, 30100 Campus Espinardo, Murcia, Spain
关键词
Awareness; Invasive alien species; Estuaries; Freshwater; Human health; Socioeconomics; FISHERIES MANAGEMENT; CONSERVATION; BIODIVERSITY; KNOWLEDGE; SCIENTISTS; ATTITUDES; IMPACTS; SCIENCE; EUROPE; VIEWS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114632
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Public engagement is vital to effectively manage Invasive Alien Species (IAS) and biosecurity campaigns directed to stakeholders are decisive to raise awareness regarding IAS regulations and problems. To design and implement adequate communication plans, stakeholders' perceptions and risk behaviors regarding IAS need to be monitored by surveys. IAS do not recognize borders and most countries are not biogeographically isolated. Therefore, international information and consensus are necessary when applying measures at a biogeographic scale. Our bilingual survey was performed at the Iberian Peninsula, targeting the general public, decision-makers and other stakeholders, covering all taxa associated to inland aquatic ecosystems. We found differences in IAS' awareness between countries, and between different stakeholder groups. Results showed that the awareness of socioeconomic and human health impacts is substantially lower when compared with impacts on biodiversity. We found that the perception regarding the predation impacts is consistent across groups and countries, while other perceptions differ. The negative socioeconomic impact on angling due to IAS introductions is widely recognized. However, angling is also the activity most referred as positively impacted by IAS due to fish introductions. Most responders knew what IAS are, providing correct species examples. For all three awareness types (Biodiversity, Socio-economic and Human health) the model regressions showed that the most important predictor was the country of provenance of the respondent, followed by Education level for the socio-economic and biodiversity regressions and the stakeholder group in the Human health regression. We can conclude that in Portugal and Spain the general public and other key target-groups have reduced understanding of some threats posed by IAS. We highlight that raising awareness about IAS impacts on humans, namely on socio-economic aspects and human health, may be more effective and it is certainly needed in education campaigns towards IAS.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A synthesis of modern organic carbon accumulation rates in coastal and aquatic inland ecosystems
    Grace M. Wilkinson
    Alice Besterman
    Cal Buelo
    Jessica Gephart
    Michael L. Pace
    Scientific Reports, 8
  • [42] A synthesis of modern organic carbon accumulation rates in coastal and aquatic inland ecosystems
    Wilkinson, Grace M.
    Besterman, Alice
    Buelo, Cal
    Gephart, Jessica
    Pace, Michael L.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2018, 8
  • [43] Potential for biotic resistance from herbivores to tropical and subtropical plant invasions in aquatic ecosystems
    Petruzzella, Antonella
    Grutters, Bart M. C.
    Thomaz, Sidinei M.
    Bakker, Elisabeth S.
    AQUATIC INVASIONS, 2017, 12 (03) : 343 - 353
  • [44] Nitrosamines in Aquatic Ecosystems: Sources, Formation, Toxicity, Environmental Risk (Review). 2. Content In Aquatic Biota, Biological Effects and Risk Assessment
    I. I. Rudneva
    S. O. Omel’chenko
    Water Resources, 2021, 48 : 291 - 299
  • [45] Nitrosamines in Aquatic Ecosystems: Sources, Formation, Toxicity, Environmental Risk (Review). 2. Content In Aquatic Biota, Biological Effects and Risk Assessment
    Rudneva, I. I.
    Omel'chenko, S. O.
    WATER RESOURCES, 2021, 48 (02) : 291 - 299
  • [46] Risk of biological invasions is concentrated in biodiversity hotspots
    Li, Xianping
    Liu, Xuan
    Kraus, Fred
    Tingley, Reid
    Li, Yiming
    FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 14 (08) : 411 - 417
  • [47] Biological indicators for pollution detection in terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems
    Alaa Zaghloul
    Mohamed Saber
    Samir Gadow
    Fikry Awad
    Bulletin of the National Research Centre, 44 (1)
  • [48] Distinctiveness magnifies the impact of biological invaders in aquatic ecosystems
    Ricciardi, A
    Atkinson, SK
    ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2004, 7 (09) : 781 - 784
  • [49] Thiamine dynamics in aquatic ecosystems and its biological implications
    Niimi, AJ
    Jackson, CJC
    Fitzsimons, JD
    INTERNATIONALE REVUE DER GESAMTEN HYDROBIOLOGIE, 1997, 82 (01): : 47 - 56
  • [50] BIOLOGICAL AND CHEMICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF SURFACE MICROLAYERS IN AQUATIC ECOSYSTEMS
    PARKER, B
    BARSOM, G
    BIOSCIENCE, 1970, 20 (02) : 87 - &