High accuracy analysis of fiber-optic laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy by using multivariate regression analytical methods

被引:12
|
作者
Chen, Feng [1 ]
Lu, Wanjie [1 ]
Chu, Yanwu [1 ]
Zhang, Deng [1 ]
Guo, Cong [1 ]
Zhao, Zhifang [1 ]
Zeng, Qingdong [2 ]
Li, Jiaming [3 ]
Guo, Lianbo [1 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol HUST, Wuhan Natl Lab Optoelect WNLO, Wuhan 430074, Hubei, Peoples R China
[2] Hubei Engn Univ, Sch Phys & Elect Informat Engn, Xiaogan 432000, Hubei, Peoples R China
[3] South China Normal Univ, Guangzhou Key Lab Special Fiber Photon Devices, Guangzhou 510631, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Fiber-optic Laser-induced breakdown spectros-copy; Multivariate analysis methods; Partial least squares; Sparse partial least squares; Support vector machine; PARTIAL LEAST-SQUARES; QUANTITATIVE-ANALYSIS; ELEMENTS; MACHINE; SAMPLES; LIBS; CLASSIFICATION; IMPROVEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.sab.2021.106160
中图分类号
O433 [光谱学];
学科分类号
0703 ; 070302 ;
摘要
Fiber-optic laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (FO-LIBS), which delivers the laser energy through an optical fiber cable, is more suitable for remote analysis and applying in complex environment than traditional laserinduced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS). However, since the laser fluence is limited by optical fiber loss and attenuation, FO-LIBS suffers more from spectral interference, matrix effect, and self-absorption effect. In this work, three multivariate quantitative analytical methods, including two linear models partial least squares (PLS) and sparse partial least squares (SPLS), one nonlinear model support vector machine (SVM), were utilized to carry out the quantitative analysis of four trace metal elements (Manganese (Mn), Chromium (Cr), Nickel (Ni), and Titanium (Ti)) in pig iron. And the quantitative analytical ability of linear model and nonlinear model was studied and compared. The results show that nonlinear SVM model has the best performance. Using the SVM model, the coefficients of determination (R2) of Mn, Cr, Ni, and Ti were 0.9705, 0.9849, 0.9882, and 0.9837, respectively, and the root mean squared errors of prediction (RMSEP) of Mn, Cr, Ni, and Ti were 0.0982 wt%, 0.0185 wt%, 0.0179 wt%, and 0.0178 wt%, respectively. This work demonstrates that nonlinear quantitative analytical methods can effectively overcome those nonlinear effects and improve the quantitative analytical accuracy of FO-LIBS
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Analytical study of seashell using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy
    Li, Ying
    Gu, Yanhong
    Zhang, Ying
    Li, Yuandong
    Lu, Yuan
    PLASMA SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 19 (02)
  • [32] LASER-INDUCED BREAKDOWN SPECTROSCOPY AS AN ANALYTICAL TOOL
    GODDARD, BJ
    ALLOTT, RM
    TELLE, HH
    INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS CONFERENCE SERIES, 1991, (113): : 241 - 255
  • [33] Quantitative analysis of Cr in soil based on variable selection coupled with multivariate regression using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy
    Huang, Yutao
    Lin, Jingjun
    Lin, Xiaomei
    Zheng, Weinan
    JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL ATOMIC SPECTROMETRY, 2021, 36 (11) : 2553 - 2559
  • [34] Multivariate quantitative analysis of metal elements in steel using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy
    Wang, Zhi
    Chu, Yanwu
    Chen, Feng
    Sheng, Ziqian
    Guo, Lianbo
    APPLIED OPTICS, 2019, 58 (27) : 7615 - 7620
  • [35] Univariate and Multivariate Analysis of Phosphorus Element in Fertilizers Using Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy
    Zhang, Baohua
    Ling, Pengpeng
    Sha, Wen
    Jiang, Yongcheng
    Cui, Zhifeng
    SENSORS, 2019, 19 (07)
  • [36] Novel Multivariate Analysis for Soil Carbon Measurements Using Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy
    Martin, Madhavi Z.
    Labbe, Nicole
    Andre, Nicolas
    Wullschleger, Stan D.
    Harris, Ronny D.
    Ebinger, Michael H.
    SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 2010, 74 (01) : 87 - 93
  • [37] Provenance determination of sapphires and rubies using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy and multivariate analysis
    Kochelek, Kristen A.
    McMillan, Nancy J.
    McManus, Catherine E.
    Daniel, David L.
    AMERICAN MINERALOGIST, 2015, 100 (8-9) : 1921 - 1931
  • [38] Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy of Steel: A Comparison of Univariate and Multivariate Calibration Methods
    Stipe, Christopher B.
    Hensley, Brian D.
    Boersema, Jeffrey L.
    Buckley, Steven G.
    APPLIED SPECTROSCOPY, 2010, 64 (02) : 154 - 160
  • [39] A study of machine learning regression methods for major elemental analysis of rocks using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy
    Boucher, Thomas F.
    Ozanne, Marie V.
    Carmosino, Marco L.
    Dyar, M. Darby
    Mahadevan, Sridhar
    Breves, Elly A.
    Lepore, Kate H.
    Clegg, Samuel M.
    SPECTROCHIMICA ACTA PART B-ATOMIC SPECTROSCOPY, 2015, 107 : 1 - 10
  • [40] A Multivariate Nonlinear Model for Quantitative Analysis in Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy
    Chen Xing-long
    Fu Hong-bo
    Wang Jing-ge
    Ni Zhi-bo
    He Wen-gan
    Xu Jun
    Rao Rui-zhong
    Dung Feng-zhong
    SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2014, 34 (11) : 3100 - 3103