Risk Markers for Physical Teen Dating Violence Perpetration: A Meta-Analysis

被引:41
|
作者
Spencer, Chelsea M. [1 ]
Toews, Michelle L. [2 ]
Anders, Kristin M. [3 ]
Emanuels, Sarah K. [4 ]
机构
[1] Kansas State Univ, Couple & Family Therapy Program, Manhattan, KS 66506 USA
[2] Kansas State Univ, Coll Human Ecol, Res & Grad Studies, Manhattan, KS 66506 USA
[3] Kansas State Univ, Sch Family Studies & Human Serv, Manhattan, KS 66506 USA
[4] Kansas State Univ, Appl Family Sci Program, Manhattan, KS 66506 USA
关键词
youth violence; dating violence; domestic violence; cultural contexts; INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE; HIGH-SCHOOL-STUDENTS; ROMANTIC RELATIONSHIPS; FAMILY VIOLENCE; ADOLESCENT RELATIONSHIPS; LONGITUDINAL PREDICTOR; GENDER-DIFFERENCES; GIRLS USE; VICTIMIZATION; AGGRESSION;
D O I
10.1177/1524838019875700
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Teen dating violence (TDV) is a common problem among adolescents and has been linked to various negative outcomes. This study used Dutton's nested ecological theory to examine risk markers for physical TDV perpetration and examine whether there are significant differences in the strength of risk markers between male and female adolescents. This meta-analysis included 37 studies yielding 126 unique effect sizes for risk markers for physical TDV perpetration in samples from the United States. In the microsystem level, a total of 14 risk markers were examined and in the ontogenetic level, 12 risk markers were examined. Our results revealed that, in the microsystem, physical TDV victimization was the strongest risk marker for physical TDV perpetration. On the ontogenetic level, externalizing behaviors, approval of violence, risky sexual behaviors, alcohol use, depression, and delinquency were the strongest risk markers for TDV perpetration. Conflict resolution skills and responsibility were protective markers against TDV perpetration. When comparing the strength of risk markers between males and females, we found that undifferentiated TDV perpetration and depression were significantly stronger risk markers for female perpetration than male perpetration. We also found that exhibiting controlling behaviors was a significantly stronger risk marker for male TDV perpetration than female TDV perpetration. These findings highlight the importance of the microsystem, specifically the dating relationship itself, when identifying adolescents at risk for TDV perpetration.
引用
收藏
页码:619 / 631
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Risk Markers for Victimization and Perpetration of Male-to-Female Physical Intimate Partner Violence in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Meta-Analysis
    Mootz, Jennifer J.
    Spencer, Chelsea M.
    Ettelbrick, Julia
    Kann, Bianca
    Fortunato dos Santos, Palmira
    Palmer, Megan
    Stith, Sandra M.
    TRAUMA VIOLENCE & ABUSE, 2023, 24 (05) : 3433 - 3444
  • [22] Military/Civilian Risk Markers for Physical Intimate Partner Violence: A Meta-Analysis
    Smith-Marek, Erika N.
    Cafferky, Bryan
    Dominguez, Maria M.
    Spencer, Chelsea
    Van, Kimberly
    Stith, Sandra M.
    Oliver, Mark A.
    VIOLENCE AND VICTIMS, 2016, 31 (05) : 787 - 818
  • [23] Examining the effects of teen dating violence prevention programs: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lee, Chelsey
    Wong, Jennifer S.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL CRIMINOLOGY, 2022, 18 (01) : 1 - 40
  • [24] Examining the effects of teen dating violence prevention programs: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chelsey Lee
    Jennifer S. Wong
    Journal of Experimental Criminology, 2022, 18 : 1 - 40
  • [25] Teen dating violence perpetration and relation to STI and sexual risk behaviours among adolescent males
    Reed, Elizabeth
    Miller, Elizabeth
    Raj, Anita
    Decker, Michele R.
    Silverman, Jay G.
    SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED INFECTIONS, 2014, 90 (04) : 322 - 324
  • [26] The Interplay of Perceptions and Conflict Behaviors during Disagreements: A Daily Study of Physical Teen Dating Violence Perpetration
    Fortin, Andreanne
    Paradis, Alison
    Hebert, Martine
    Lapierre, Andreanne
    JOURNAL OF INTERPERSONAL VIOLENCE, 2022, 37 (17-18) : NP16453 - NP16475
  • [27] Youth Experiences of Family Violence and Teen Dating Violence Perpetration: Cognitive and Emotional Mediators
    Ernest N. Jouriles
    Renee McDonald
    Victoria Mueller
    John H. Grych
    Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 2012, 15 : 58 - 68
  • [28] Youth Experiences of Family Violence and Teen Dating Violence Perpetration: Cognitive and Emotional Mediators
    Jouriles, Ernest N.
    McDonald, Renee
    Mueller, Victoria
    Grych, John H.
    CLINICAL CHILD AND FAMILY PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2012, 15 (01) : 58 - 68
  • [29] Correction to: Examining the effects of teen dating violence prevention programs: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chelsey Lee
    Jennifer S. Wong
    Journal of Experimental Criminology, 2022, 18 : 695 - 705
  • [30] What goes around comes around: The loop of physical teen dating violence perpetration among Turkish adolescents
    Toplu-Demirtas, Ezgi
    Iyiaydin, Aysegul Araci
    PREVALENCE AND PREDICTORS OF TEEN DATING VIOLENCE: A EUROPEAN PERSPECTIVE, 2021, 178 : 95 - 113