Structural analysis of value creation in software service platforms

被引:30
|
作者
Haile, Netsanet [1 ]
Altmann, Joern [1 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Engn, Technol Management Econ & Policy TEMEP, 1 Gwanak Ro, Seoul 08826, South Korea
关键词
Software ecosystem; Network effects; TAM; Utility theory; Value creation; Mobile software service platforms; INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY; INTRINSIC MOTIVATION; PERCEIVED USEFULNESS; USER ACCEPTANCE; WEB; ADOPTION; EASE; COMPATIBILITY; WILLINGNESS; COMPETITION;
D O I
10.1007/s12525-015-0208-8
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
As software service platforms grow in number of users and variety of service offerings, it raises the question of how this phenomenon impacts the value obtained by users. This paper identifies system usability, service variety, and personal connectivity to be the major determinants that contribute to the value offered to users on mobile software service platforms. A structural equation model, which is based on utility theory, technology acceptance theory, and the theory of network externalities, has been constructed from seven observed constructs, reflecting the three determinants and the user value. The lower bound of user value is estimated through the user's willingness-to-pay for services and the user's willingness to spend time on using services. For the validation, a co-variance-based structural equation analysis has been conducted on online survey data of 210 users of mobile service platforms (e.g., Android, iOS). The results show that the number of services used and the number of active user connections were found to be the strongest constructs explaining user value. Perceived usefulness did not explain user value as much. In total, they can explain 49 % of the value that the user receives from the platform. The implication of this result is that users' value from a software service platform cannot be explained by the technology acceptance model itself. Instead, an approach that, as used in this research, of integrating network externality theory, utility theory, and technology acceptance theory is necessary.
引用
收藏
页码:129 / 142
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Classification of service model and value creation
    Ueda, Kanji
    Takenaka, Takeshi
    9TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON E-COMMERCE TECHNOLOGY/4TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENTERPRISE COMPUTING, E-COMMERCE AND E-SERVICES, 2007, : 497 - +
  • [22] Future service technologies and value creation
    Kristensson, Per
    JOURNAL OF SERVICES MARKETING, 2019, 33 (04) : 502 - 506
  • [23] IT Service Value Creation in a Global Environment
    Carter, Pamela E.
    JOURNAL OF GLOBAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2010, 13 (04) : 4 - 27
  • [24] Relationality in the service logic of value creation
    FitzPatrick, Mary
    Varey, Richard J.
    Groenroos, Christian
    Davey, Janet
    JOURNAL OF SERVICES MARKETING, 2015, 29 (6-7) : 463 - 471
  • [25] Linking service design to value creation and service research
    Andreassen, Tor Wallin
    Kristensson, Per
    Lervik-Olsen, Line
    Parasuraman, A.
    McColl-Kennedy, Janet R.
    Edvardsson, Bo
    Colurcio, Maria
    JOURNAL OF SERVICE MANAGEMENT, 2016, 27 (01) : 21 - 29
  • [26] SOURCES OF VALUE CREATION IN SERVICE GLOBAL VALUE CHAINS
    Stare, Metka
    Jaklic, Andreja
    AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC, 2020, 22 (55) : 846 - 866
  • [27] Service creation techniques for software development and deployment
    Schoo, P
    TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND IT CONVERGENCE TOWARDS SERVICE E-VOLUTION, 2000, 1774 : 133 - 134
  • [28] Barriers analysis for customer resource contribution in value co-creation for service industry using interpretive structural modeling
    Roy Ghatak, Ranjit
    JOURNAL OF MODELLING IN MANAGEMENT, 2020, 15 (03) : 1137 - 1166
  • [29] Determining Service Value: Exploring the Link Between Value Creation and Service Evaluation
    Foglieni, Francesca
    Holmlid, Stefan
    SERVICE SCIENCE, 2017, 9 (01) : 74 - 90
  • [30] Value creation and sustainable growth of sharing economy platforms: a value network perspective
    Sun, Shouheng
    Ertz, Myriam
    TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS & STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, 2024,