Science Informed Policies for Managing Water

被引:6
|
作者
Loucks, Daniel P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Cornell Univ, Inst Publ Affairs, Civil & Environm Engn, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
关键词
science; policy making; systems models; communication; case studies; water management; IRRIGATION; POLITICS; ADVICE;
D O I
10.3390/hydrology8020066
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
Water resource management policies impact how water supplies are protected, collected, stored, treated, distributed, and allocated among multiple users and purposes. Water resource policies influence the decisions made regarding the siting, design, and operation of infrastructure needed to achieve the underlying goals of these policies. Water management policies vary by region depending on particular hydrologic, economic, environmental, and social conditions, but in all cases they will have multiple impacts affecting these conditions. Science can provide estimates of various economic, ecologic, environmental, and even social impacts of alternative policies, impacts that determine how effective any particular policy may be. These impact estimates can be used to compare and evaluate alternative policies in the search for identifying the best ones to implement. Among all scientists providing inputs to policy making processes are analysts who develop and apply models that provide these estimated impacts and, possibly, their probabilities of occurrence. However, just producing them is not a guarantee that they will be considered by policy makers. This paper reviews various aspects of the science-policy interface and factors that can influence what information policy makers need from scientists. This paper suggests some ways scientists and analysts can contribute to and inform those making water management policy decisions. Brief descriptions of some water management policy making examples illustrate some successes and failures of science informing and influencing policy.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] What science policies?
    不详
    PHYSICS WORLD, 1997, 10 (05) : 3 - 3
  • [42] Spotlight on science policies
    Taylor, I
    Ingram, A
    CHEMISTRY IN BRITAIN, 1997, 33 (04) : 23 - 24
  • [43] Policies on managing risk in agricultural markets
    Larson, DF
    Anderson, JR
    Varangis, P
    WORLD BANK RESEARCH OBSERVER, 2004, 19 (02): : 199 - 230
  • [44] Simple Policies for Managing Flexible Capacity
    Janakiraman, Ganesh
    Nagarajan, Mahesh
    Veeraraghavanc, Senthil
    M&SOM-MANUFACTURING & SERVICE OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2018, 20 (02) : 333 - 346
  • [45] SCIENCE, VALUES, AND POLICIES
    MEEHAN, EJ
    AMERICAN BEHAVIORAL SCIENTIST, 1973, 17 (01) : 53 - 100
  • [46] A tool for managing security policies in organisations
    Alvarez, Anna V.
    Garcia, Karen A.
    Monroy, Raul
    Trejo, Luis A.
    Vazquez, Jesus
    ADVANCES IN INFORMATION AND COMPUTER SECURITY, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, 4266 : 378 - 388
  • [47] A toolkit for managing enterprise privacy policies
    Backes, M
    Pfitzmann, B
    Schunter, M
    COMPUTER SECURITY - ESORICS 2003, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, 2808 : 162 - 180
  • [48] Managing Households' Expectations with Unconventional Policies
    D'Acunto, Francesco
    Hoang, Daniel
    Weber, Michael
    REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2022, 35 (04): : 1597 - 1642
  • [49] Managing policies for dynamic spectrum access
    Lewis, David
    Feeney, Kevin
    Foley, Kevin
    Doyle, Linda
    Forde, Tim
    Argyroudis, Patroklos
    Keeney, John
    O'Sullivan, Declan
    AUTONOMIC NETWORKING, 2006, 4195 : 285 - 297
  • [50] Integrated science informs forest and water allocation policies in the South East of Australia
    Brookes, Justin D.
    Aldridge, Kane
    Dalby, Paul
    Oemcke, Darren
    Cooling, Marcus
    Daniel, Trevor
    Deane, David
    Johnson, Andrew
    Harding, Claire
    Gibbs, Matthew
    Ganf, George
    Simonic, Milo
    Wood, Cameron
    INLAND WATERS, 2017, 7 (03) : 358 - 371