Decreasing utilization of minimally invasive hysterectomy for cervical cancer in the United States

被引:23
|
作者
Matsuo, Koji [1 ,2 ]
Mandelbaum, Rachel S. [1 ]
Klar, Maximilian [3 ]
Ciesielski, Katharine M. [1 ]
Matsushima, Kazuhide [4 ]
Matsuzaki, Shinya [1 ]
Roman, Lynda D. [1 ,2 ]
Wright, Jason D. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southern Calif, Div Gynecol Oncol, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, 2020 Zonal Ave,IRD 520, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
[2] Univ Southern Calif, Norris Comprehens Canc Ctr, Los Angeles, CA 90007 USA
[3] Univ Freiburg, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Freiburg, Germany
[4] Univ Southern Calif, Dept Surg, Div Acute Care Surg, Los Angeles, CA 90007 USA
[5] Columbia Univ Coll Phys & Surg, Div Gynecol Oncol, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, 630 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032 USA
关键词
Cervical cancer; Minimally invasive hysterectomy; LACC trial; Trend; Complication; RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY; GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY; SURGERY; VOLUME; RATES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.05.005
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective. To examine the influence of the first level I evidence (Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer [LACC] trial) on minimally invasive hysterectomy use and perioperative complications for cervical cancer surgery. Methods. This was population-based retrospective observational study, querying National Inpatient Sample. Women with cervical cancer who underwent hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy from 10/2015-12/2018 were examined. A quasi-experimental analysis with interrupted-time series was performed to assess the influ-ence of the LACC trial report on minimally invasive hysterectomy use and perioperative complication rates. Results. 5120 women in the pre-LACC period and 1645 women in the post-LACC period were compared. Following the LACC trial report on 3/2018, the minimally invasive hysterectomy use dropped by 19.7 percent points in one month (55.2% in 3/2018 to 35.5% in 4/2018), followed by a continued decline of 8.0% (95% confidence interval 0.1-15.3) monthly. By 12/2018, minimally invasive hysterectomy was used in 17.9% of cases, which was 38.8 percent points lower than the expected rate per the pre-LACC period projection. In multivariable analysis, women in the post-LACC period were 63% less likely to undergo minimally invasive hysterectomy (adjusted odds ratio 0.37, 95% confidence interval 0.33-0.42) but 23% more likely to have a perioperative complication (38.6% versus 29.1%, adjusted-odds ratio 1.23, 95% confidence interval 1.08-1.40) compared to those in the pre-LACC period. Women in the post-LACC group were more likely to have a longer hospital stay compared to those in the pre-LACC group (median, 3 versus 2 days, P < 0.001). Conclusion. Following the LACC trial results, U.S. surgeons rapidly shifted from minimally invasive to open hysterectomy for cervical cancer. Decreasing utilization of minimally invasive surgery was associated with an increase in perioperative complications and longer hospital admissions. (c) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 49
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Minimally invasive surgery in cervical cancer
    Bogani, Giorgio
    di Donato, Violante
    Chiappa, Valentina
    Lopez, Salvatore
    Monti, Marco
    Muzii, Ludovico
    Benedetti Panici, Pierluigi
    Ditto, Antonino
    Raspagliesi, Francesco
    [J]. MINERVA OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 73 (02) : 145 - 148
  • [42] Comparative Effectiveness of Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer
    Wright, Jason D.
    Burke, William M.
    Tergas, Ana I.
    Hou, June Y.
    Huang, Yongmei
    Hu, Jim C.
    Hillyer, Grace Clarke
    Ananth, Cande V.
    Neugut, Alfred I.
    Hershman, Dawn L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 34 (10) : 1087 - +
  • [43] PATTERN OF RECURRENCE OF CERVICAL CANCER AFTER MINIMALLY-INVASIVE VERSUS OPEN ABDOMINAL RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY
    Nazzaro, Ludovica
    Schivardi, Gabriella
    De Vitis, Luigi Antonio
    Gaiano, Michela
    Zambetti, Benedetta
    Achilarre, Maria Teresa
    Aloisi, Alessia
    Betella, Ilaria
    Bruni, Simone
    Garbi, Annalisa
    Aletti, Giovanni Damiano
    Zanagnolo, Vanna
    Colombo, Nicoletta
    Maggioni, Angelo
    Multinu, Francesco
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2023, 33 : A77 - A78
  • [44] Impact of facility volume on the outcomes of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer
    Nasioudis, Dimitrios
    Andriani, Leslie
    Byrne, Maureen
    Ko, Emily
    Haggerty, Ashley
    Cory, Lori
    Giuntoli, Robert
    Kim, Sarah
    Morgan, Mark
    Latif, Nawar
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2021, 162 : S178 - S178
  • [45] What Is the Future of Radical Hysterectomy? Commentary on the Indication for Minimally Invasive Surgery for Cervical Cancer ≤ 2 cm
    Chikazawa, Kenro
    Imai, Ken
    Kuwata, Tomoyuki
    Konno, Ryo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA, 2024, 46 (07)
  • [46] Assessing minimally invasive simple hysterectomy in low risk cervical cancer: set up for the LASH trial
    Bizzarri, Nicolo
    Abu-Rustum, Nadeem R.
    Plante, Marie
    Ramirez, Pedro T.
    Chiva, Luis
    Falconer, Henrik
    Cibula, David
    Querleu, Denis
    Fanfani, Francesco
    Fagotti, Anna
    Scambia, Giovanni
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2024,
  • [47] Extent of disease and oncologic outcomes in cervical cancer patients undergoing minimally invasive and open radical hysterectomy
    Gien, Lilian
    Cusimano, Maria
    Poxon, Amanda
    Sutradhar, Rinku
    Lena Nguyen
    Liu, Ning
    Ferguson, Sarah
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2023, 176 : S66 - S66
  • [49] Innovations in Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy
    Ridgeway, Beri
    Falcone, Tommaso
    [J]. CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 57 (01): : 83 - 94
  • [50] Hospital level under-utilization of minimally invasive surgery in the United States: retrospective review
    Cooper, Michol A.
    Hutfless, Susan
    Segev, Dorry L.
    Ibrahim, Andrew
    Lyu, Heather
    Makary, Martin A.
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2014, 349