Decreasing utilization of minimally invasive hysterectomy for cervical cancer in the United States

被引:23
|
作者
Matsuo, Koji [1 ,2 ]
Mandelbaum, Rachel S. [1 ]
Klar, Maximilian [3 ]
Ciesielski, Katharine M. [1 ]
Matsushima, Kazuhide [4 ]
Matsuzaki, Shinya [1 ]
Roman, Lynda D. [1 ,2 ]
Wright, Jason D. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southern Calif, Div Gynecol Oncol, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, 2020 Zonal Ave,IRD 520, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
[2] Univ Southern Calif, Norris Comprehens Canc Ctr, Los Angeles, CA 90007 USA
[3] Univ Freiburg, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Freiburg, Germany
[4] Univ Southern Calif, Dept Surg, Div Acute Care Surg, Los Angeles, CA 90007 USA
[5] Columbia Univ Coll Phys & Surg, Div Gynecol Oncol, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, 630 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032 USA
关键词
Cervical cancer; Minimally invasive hysterectomy; LACC trial; Trend; Complication; RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY; GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY; SURGERY; VOLUME; RATES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.05.005
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective. To examine the influence of the first level I evidence (Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer [LACC] trial) on minimally invasive hysterectomy use and perioperative complications for cervical cancer surgery. Methods. This was population-based retrospective observational study, querying National Inpatient Sample. Women with cervical cancer who underwent hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy from 10/2015-12/2018 were examined. A quasi-experimental analysis with interrupted-time series was performed to assess the influ-ence of the LACC trial report on minimally invasive hysterectomy use and perioperative complication rates. Results. 5120 women in the pre-LACC period and 1645 women in the post-LACC period were compared. Following the LACC trial report on 3/2018, the minimally invasive hysterectomy use dropped by 19.7 percent points in one month (55.2% in 3/2018 to 35.5% in 4/2018), followed by a continued decline of 8.0% (95% confidence interval 0.1-15.3) monthly. By 12/2018, minimally invasive hysterectomy was used in 17.9% of cases, which was 38.8 percent points lower than the expected rate per the pre-LACC period projection. In multivariable analysis, women in the post-LACC period were 63% less likely to undergo minimally invasive hysterectomy (adjusted odds ratio 0.37, 95% confidence interval 0.33-0.42) but 23% more likely to have a perioperative complication (38.6% versus 29.1%, adjusted-odds ratio 1.23, 95% confidence interval 1.08-1.40) compared to those in the pre-LACC period. Women in the post-LACC group were more likely to have a longer hospital stay compared to those in the pre-LACC group (median, 3 versus 2 days, P < 0.001). Conclusion. Following the LACC trial results, U.S. surgeons rapidly shifted from minimally invasive to open hysterectomy for cervical cancer. Decreasing utilization of minimally invasive surgery was associated with an increase in perioperative complications and longer hospital admissions. (c) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 49
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cervical Cancer: decreased minimally invasive Hysterectomy in the United States
    Lorenz, Judith
    [J]. GEBURTSHILFE UND FRAUENHEILKUNDE, 2021, 81 (10) : 1083 - +
  • [2] Minimally Invasive or Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer
    Chiva, Luis
    Cibula, David
    Querleu, Denis
    Gil-Moreno, Antonio
    Magrina, Javier F.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2019, 380 (08): : 793 - 794
  • [3] Minimally invasive surgery in radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer
    Lee, Chyi-Long
    Huang, Kuan-Gen
    Chua, Peng-Teng
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GYNAECOLOGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 41 (06) : 852 - 857
  • [4] Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer
    Wright, J.
    Herzog, T.
    Neugut, A.
    Burke, W.
    Lu, Y.
    Lewin, S.
    Hershman, D.
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2012, 125 : S59 - S59
  • [5] Increasing Utilization of Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy
    Walters, Mark D.
    Ridgeway, Beri M.
    [J]. CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 60 (02): : 273 - 285
  • [6] Minimally Invasive versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer
    Ramirez, Pedro T.
    Frumovitz, Michael
    Pareja, Rene
    Lopez, Aldo
    Vieira, Marcelo
    Ribeiro, Reitan
    Buda, Alessandro
    Yan, Xiaojian
    Yao Shuzhong
    Chetty, Naven
    Isla, David
    Tamura, Mariano
    Zhu, Tao
    Robledo, Kristy P.
    Gebski, Val
    Asher, Rebecca
    Behan, Vanessa
    Nicklin, James L.
    Coleman, Robert L.
    Obermair, Andreas
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2018, 379 (20): : 1895 - 1904
  • [7] Investigating the Role of Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy in Cervical Cancer
    Bogani, Giorgio
    Ditto, Antonino
    Martinelli, Fabio
    Chiappa, Valentina
    Leone Roberti Maggiore, Umberto
    Lorusso, Domenica
    Raspagliesi, Francesco
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE SURGERY, 2020, 33 (04) : 387 - 388
  • [8] Minimally Invasive or Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer Reply
    Melamed, Alexander
    Wright, Jason D.
    Rauh-Hain, J. Alejandro
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2019, 380 (08): : 795 - 795
  • [9] Decreasing Utilization of Vaginal Hysterectomy in the United States: An Analysis by Candidacy for Vaginal Approach
    Hong, Christopher X.
    O'Leary, Michael
    Horner, Whitney
    Schmidt, Payton C.
    Harvie, Heidi S.
    Kamdar, Neil S.
    Morgan, Daniel M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2024,
  • [10] Disparities in Utilization and Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Techniques for Gastric Cancer Surgery in the United States
    Park, Joon Y.
    Verma, Arjun
    Tran, Zachary K.
    Mederos, Michael A.
    Benharash, Peyman
    Girgis, Mark
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 29 (05) : 3136 - 3146