Biomimicry Training to Promote Employee Engagement in Sustainability

被引:6
|
作者
McInerney, Sarah J. [1 ]
Niewiarowski, Peter H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Akron, Program Integrated Biosci, Dept Biol, Akron, OH 44325 USA
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
corporate sustainability; biomimicry; employee engagement; sustainable innovation; training psychology; environmental psychology; INTRINSIC MOTIVATION; NATURE RELATEDNESS; CONNECTEDNESS; CONNECTION; DESIGN; BIOMIMETICS; CREATIVITY; SCALE; PATH;
D O I
10.3390/biomimetics7020071
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Employees play a critical role in the success of corporate sustainability initiatives, yet sustained employee engagement is a constant challenge. The psychology literature states that to intrinsically motivate employees to engage in sustainability, there must be opportunity for employees to engage in practices that are directly relevant to their job duties. Traditional ad hoc initiatives such as Earth Week events, recycling challenges and so on, are not sufficient to derive this type of intrinsic motivation. Therefore, the goal of this study was to examine the psychological impact of a biomimicry sustainable innovation training program, to intrinsically motivate R&D employees to reconnect with nature and identify whether this promotes creative thinking and employee engagement. Due to COVID-19 restrictions, the current study conducted virtual workshops with R&D employees and demonstrated that biomimicry training was intrinsically motivating to employees and was valued as a practice that could be incorporated into R&D job duties. In conclusion, this study provides an adaptable procedural template for biomimicry training with a corporate audience. The results demonstrate a strong business case for organizations to experiment with biomimicry by illustrating its potential to create positive change across several business units beyond sustainable innovation to include human resources and sustainable marketing.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Biomimicry principles as evaluation criteria of sustainability in the construction industry
    Oguntona, Olusegun Aanuoluwapo
    Aigbavboa, Clinton Ohis
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON APPLIED ENERGY, 2017, 142 : 2491 - 2497
  • [22] THE MEASUREMENT OF EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT
    Matz-Costa, C.
    James, J.
    Besen, E.
    GERONTOLOGIST, 2010, 50 : 92 - 92
  • [23] The Meaning of Employee Engagement
    Macey, William H.
    Schneider, Benjamin
    INDUSTRIAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY-PERSPECTIVES ON SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2008, 1 (01): : 3 - 30
  • [24] The drivers of employee engagement
    不详
    LONG RANGE PLANNING, 2005, 38 (03) : 325 - 325
  • [25] The Research on IT Employee Engagement
    Zhang Jiandong
    Min, Hou
    2009 IEEE 10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER-AIDED INDUSTRIAL DESIGN & CONCEPTUAL DESIGN, VOLS 1-3: E-BUSINESS, CREATIVE DESIGN, MANUFACTURING - CAID&CD'2009, 2009, : 2004 - +
  • [26] Keys to employee engagement
    Flinchbaugh, Jamie
    Assembly, 2010, 53 (04):
  • [27] Can training promote employee organizational commitment? The effect of employability and expectation value
    Ling, Ling
    Qing, Tao
    Shen, Peng
    NANKAI BUSINESS REVIEW INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 5 (02) : 162 - 186
  • [28] Employee Engagement on Employee Performance: Islamic Perspective
    Arifin, Noor
    Tjahjono, Heru Kurnianto
    Hartono, Arif
    Muafi, Muafi
    SUSTAINABLE FINANCE, DIGITALIZATION AND THE ROLE OF TECHNOLOGY, ICBT 2021, 2023, 487 : 995 - 1003
  • [29] THE ROLE OF EMPLOYEE BENEFITS IN INCREASING EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT
    Braje, Ivana Nacinovic
    Kusen, Valentina
    EKONOMSKA MISAO I PRAKSA-ECONOMIC THOUGHT AND PRACTICE, 2016, 25 (01): : 197 - 215
  • [30] Stimulating employee ambidexterity and employee engagement in SMEs
    Ajayi, Oluseyi Moses
    Odusanya, Kayode
    Morton, Susan
    MANAGEMENT DECISION, 2017, 55 (04) : 662 - 680