Functional Aortic Root Parameters and Expression of Aortopathy in Bicuspid Versus Tricuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis

被引:39
|
作者
Girdauskas, Evaldas [1 ]
Rouman, Mina [2 ]
Disha, Kushtrim [2 ]
Fey, Beatrix [3 ]
Dubslaff, Georg [3 ]
Theis, Bernhard [4 ]
Petersen, Iver [4 ]
Gutberlet, Matthias [5 ]
Borger, Michael A. [6 ]
Kuntze, Thomas [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Heart Ctr, Dept Cardiovasc Surg, Hamburg, Germany
[2] Cent Hosp, Dept Cardiac Surg, Bad Berka, Germany
[3] Cent Hosp, Dept Radiol, Bad Berka, Germany
[4] Univ Jena, Inst Pathol, Jena, Germany
[5] Ctr Heart, Dept Radiol, Leipzig, Germany
[6] Columbia Univ, Med Ctr, New York, NY USA
关键词
aorta; bicuspid aortic valve; hemodynamics; valves; ASCENDING AORTA; ANEURYSMS; PATTERNS; DISEASE; ASSOCIATION; DILATATION; MORPHOLOGY; PHENOTYPE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jacc.2016.02.015
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND The correlation between bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) disease and aortopathy is not fully defined. OBJECTIVES This study aimed to prospectively analyze the correlation between functional parameters of the aortic root and expression of aortopathy in patients undergoing surgery for BAV versus tricuspid aortic valve (TAV) stenosis. METHODS From January 1, 2012 through December 31, 2014, 190 consecutive patients (63 +/- 8 years, 67% male) underwent aortic valve replacement +/- proximal aortic surgery for BAV stenosis (n = 137, BAV group) and TAV stenosis (n = 53, TAV group). All patients underwent pre-operative cardiac magnetic resonance imaging to evaluate morphological/functional parameters of the aortic root. Aortic tissue was sampled during surgery on the basis of the location of eccentric blood flow contact with the aortic wall, as determined by cardiac magnetic resonance (i.e., jet sample and control sample). Aortic wall lesions were graded using a histological sum score (0 to 21). RESULTS The largest cross-sectional aortic diameters were at the mid-ascending level in both groups and were larger in BAV patients (40.2 +/- 7.2 mm vs. 36.6 +/- 3.3 mm, respectively, p < 0.001). The histological sum score was 2.9 +/- 1.4 in the BAV group versus 3.4 +/- 2.6 in the TAV group (p = 0.4). The correlation was linear and comparable between the maximum indexed aortic diameter and the angle between the left ventricular outflow axis and aortic root (left ventricle/ aorta angle) in both groups (BAV group: r = 0.6, p < 0.001 vs. TAV group r = 0.45, p = 0.03, z = 1.26, p = 0.2). Logistic regression identified the left ventricle/aorta angle as an indicator of indexed aortic diameter >22 mm/m(2) (odds ratio: 1.2; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Comparable correlation patterns between functional aortic root parameters and expression of aortopathy are found in patients with BAV versus TAV stenosis. (C) 2016 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.
引用
收藏
页码:1786 / 1796
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Long-term prognosis of ascending aortic aneurysm after aortic valve replacement for bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic valve stenosis
    Girdauskas, Evaldas
    Disha, Kushtrim
    Borger, Michael A.
    Kuntze, Thomas
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2014, 147 (01): : 276 - 282
  • [42] Aortic Valve Repair with External Annuloplasty in Bicuspid versus Tricuspid Aortic Valve Patients
    Baric, Davor
    Sliskovic, Nikola
    Sestan, Gloria
    Gjorgjievska, Savica
    Unic, Daniel
    Kusurin, Marko
    Varvodic, Josip
    Oremus, Zrinka Safaric
    Jurin, Ivana
    Bulj, Nikola
    Susnjar, Dubravka
    Rudez, Igor
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR DEVELOPMENT AND DISEASE, 2024, 11 (01)
  • [43] Updated Clinical and Procedural Outcomes in TAVR for Bicuspid Versus Tricuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis
    Ansari, Mohammad Mehdi
    Garcia, Daniel
    Shurmur, Scott
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2021, 78 (19) : B23 - B24
  • [44] Aortic replacement for bicuspid aortic valve aortopathy: When and why?
    Braverman, Alan C.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2019, 157 (02): : 520 - 525
  • [45] Type A Aortic Dissection in Patients With Bicuspid Aortic Valve Aortopathy
    Kreibich, Maximilian
    Rylski, Bartosz
    Czerny, Martin
    Pingpoh, Clarence
    Siepe, Matthias
    Beyersdorf, Friedhelm
    Khurshan, Fabliha
    Vallabhajosyula, Prashanth
    Szeto, Wilson Y.
    Bavaria, Joseph E.
    Desai, Nimesh D.
    Branchetti, Emanuela
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2020, 109 (01): : 94 - 100
  • [46] Elastic properties of the ascending aorta in patients with a bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic valve and isolated severe aortic stenosis
    Calin, A.
    Mateescu, A. D.
    Beladan, C. C.
    Rosca, M.
    Enache, R.
    Calin, C.
    Gurzun, M. M.
    Cosei, I.
    Ginghina, C.
    Popescu, B. A.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2016, 37 : 796 - 796
  • [47] Bicuspid Aortic Valve and Associated Aortopathy: An Update
    Girdauskas, Evaldas
    Borger, Michael A.
    SEMINARS IN THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2013, 25 (04) : 310 - 316
  • [48] Understanding and treating aortopathy in bicuspid aortic valve
    Broberg, Craig S.
    Therrien, Judith
    TRENDS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2015, 25 (05) : 445 - 451
  • [49] Bicuspid aortic valve durability with valve-sparing aortic root replacement: comparison to tricuspid valve
    Levine, Dov
    Patel, Parth
    Zhao, Yanling
    Childress, Patra
    Chung, Megan
    Leshnower, Bradley G.
    Kurlansky, Paul
    Smith, Craig R.
    Chen, Edward P.
    Takayama, Hiroo
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2023, 63 (04)
  • [50] Bicuspid aortic valve and its ascending aortopathy
    Dunne, Emma C.
    Lacro, Ronald V.
    Flyer, Jonathan N.
    CURRENT OPINION IN PEDIATRICS, 2023, 35 (05) : 538 - 545