Assessment of three point-of-care platelet function assays in adult trauma patients

被引:44
|
作者
Connelly, Christopher Robert [1 ]
Yonge, John D. [1 ]
McCully, Sean P. [1 ]
Hart, Kyle D. [2 ]
Hilliard, Thomas C. [1 ]
Lape, Diane E. [1 ]
Watson, Justin J. [1 ]
Rick, Beth [1 ]
Houser, Ben [1 ]
Deloughery, Thomas G. [3 ]
Schreiber, Martin A. [1 ]
Kiraly, Laszlo N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Surg, Div Trauma Crit Care & Acute Care Surg, Portland, OR 97239 USA
[2] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Surg, Portland, OR 97239 USA
[3] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Hematol & Med Oncol, Portland, OR 97239 USA
关键词
Platelet dysfunction trauma; Platelet function test trauma; Multiplate; Verify Now; Thrombelastogram platelet mapping; MULTIPLE ELECTRODE AGGREGOMETRY; LIGHT TRANSMISSION AGGREGOMETRY; BRAIN-INJURY; ANTIPLATELET THERAPY; COAGULOPATHY; CLOPIDOGREL; DYSFUNCTION; INHIBITION; ASPIRIN; THROMBELASTOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jss.2017.01.008
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Antiplatelet (AP) medication use is common among trauma patients and is associated with poor outcomes. Management options for platelet dysfunction in trauma patients are controversial, expensive, and potentially harmful. Although light transmission platelet aggregometry is considered the standard test to assess platelet function, it is cumbersome and not generally available. Currently, there are no widely accepted platelet function point-of-care tests for acute trauma. Study design: Prospective observational study from 2014 to 2015. Baseline Multiplate aggregometry aspirin area under the platelet aggregation curve (ASPI AUC), Thrombelastography Platelet Mapping percent inhibition of arachidonic acid (TEG-PM AA), and VerifyNow Aspirin Test (ARU) were compared for ability to detect any AP medication use (aspirin or clopidogrel), platelet dysfunction, and identify patients at risk for intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) progression by calculating the area under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values. Adenosine diphosphate assays were similarly evaluated. Results: Sixty-four patients were enrolled, 25 were taking AP medications. AP patients were older (71.6 versus 35.0 y, P < 0.001) and received more platelet transfusions, but other baseline characteristics were similar. Median ASPI AUC (22.0 versus 53.5 P < 0.001) and VerifyNow ARU (503.5 versus 629.0, P < 0.001) were lower, whereas TEG-PM AA (51.8% versus 18.3%, P < 0.001) was higher in AP patients. Multiplate ASPI AUC, TEG-PM AA percent inhibition, and VerifyNow ARU could identify AP medication use (AUC: 0.90, 0.77, and 0.90, respectively). Adenosine diphosphate assays did not correlate with AP medication use in this population. TEG-PM AA percent inhibition and VerifyNow ARU correlated well with Multiplate ASPI AUC to identify platelet dysfunction (AUC: 0.78, 0.89, respectively). ICH occurred in 29 patients; 12 of which had progression of their injury. ASPI AUC (AUC: 0.50) and VerifyNow ARU (AUC: 0.59) did not correlate, and TEG-PM AA percent inhibition (AUC: 0.66) minimally correlated with progression. Conclusions: Multiplate, TEG-PM, and VerifyNow are useful point-of-care tests which identify AP medication use and platelet dysfunction in trauma patients. Initial TEG-PM AA percent inhibition may be associated with risk for ICH progression. However, additional large, prospective studies are needed. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:260 / 269
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Microfluidics closes in on point-of-care assays
    Peter K Sorger
    Nature Biotechnology, 2008, 26 : 1345 - 1346
  • [22] Microfluidics closes in on point-of-care assays
    Sorger, Peter K.
    NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2008, 26 (12) : 1345 - 1346
  • [23] Comparison of accuracy of three point-of-care glucometers in an adult ICU
    A Roman
    C Hanicq
    P Flament
    T El Mahi
    F Vertongen
    E Stevens
    Critical Care, 12 (Suppl 2):
  • [24] Comparison of two point-of-care platelet function tests with platelet aggregation to identify ASA responsiveness in CAD patients
    Paniccia, R.
    Marcucci, R.
    Tellini, I.
    Antonucci, E.
    Said, A. Abdullahi
    Giglioli, C.
    Gensini, G. F.
    Abbate, R.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2006, 27 : 748 - 748
  • [25] Assessment of platelet function assays
    Nicholson, NS
    Panzer-Knodle, SG
    Haas, NF
    Taite, BB
    Szalony, JA
    Page, JD
    Feigen, LP
    Lansky, DM
    Salyers, AK
    AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 1998, 135 (05) : S170 - S178
  • [26] Comparison of two point-of-care assays to evaluate post-clopidogrel platelet reactivity
    Breugelmans, Jamie
    Claeys, Marc
    Vertessen, Francine
    Verlinden, Anke
    Van der Planken, Marc
    Vrints, Christiaan
    ACTA CARDIOLOGICA, 2009, 64 (01) : 137 - 138
  • [27] Perioperative coagulation management and control of platelet transfusion by point-of-care platelet function analysis
    Goerlinger, Klaus
    Jambor, Csilla
    Hanke, Alexander A.
    Dirkmann, Daniel
    Adamzik, Michael
    Hartmann, Matthias
    Rahe-Meyer, Niels
    TRANSFUSION MEDICINE AND HEMOTHERAPY, 2007, 34 (06) : 396 - 411
  • [28] Point-of-care platelet function testing in patients undergoing PCI: between a rock and a hard place
    J. W. van Werkum
    C. M. Hackeng
    F. I. de Korte
    F. W. A. Verheugt
    J. M. ten Berg
    Netherlands Heart Journal, 2007, 15 : 299 - 305
  • [29] Point-of-care platelet function testing in patients undergoing PCI: between a rock and a hard place
    van Werkum, J. W.
    Hackeng, C. M.
    de Korte, F. I.
    Verheugt, F. W. A.
    ten Berg, J. M.
    NETHERLANDS HEART JOURNAL, 2007, 15 (09) : 299 - 305
  • [30] COMPARING TEG® AND ROTEM® AS POINT-OF-CARE DEVICES IN TRAUMA PATIENTS
    Hagemo, J. S.
    Gaarder, C.
    Naess, P. A.
    Viksmoen, Y.
    Heier, H. E.
    VOX SANGUINIS, 2010, 99 : 437 - 437