Assessment of three point-of-care platelet function assays in adult trauma patients

被引:44
|
作者
Connelly, Christopher Robert [1 ]
Yonge, John D. [1 ]
McCully, Sean P. [1 ]
Hart, Kyle D. [2 ]
Hilliard, Thomas C. [1 ]
Lape, Diane E. [1 ]
Watson, Justin J. [1 ]
Rick, Beth [1 ]
Houser, Ben [1 ]
Deloughery, Thomas G. [3 ]
Schreiber, Martin A. [1 ]
Kiraly, Laszlo N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Surg, Div Trauma Crit Care & Acute Care Surg, Portland, OR 97239 USA
[2] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Surg, Portland, OR 97239 USA
[3] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Hematol & Med Oncol, Portland, OR 97239 USA
关键词
Platelet dysfunction trauma; Platelet function test trauma; Multiplate; Verify Now; Thrombelastogram platelet mapping; MULTIPLE ELECTRODE AGGREGOMETRY; LIGHT TRANSMISSION AGGREGOMETRY; BRAIN-INJURY; ANTIPLATELET THERAPY; COAGULOPATHY; CLOPIDOGREL; DYSFUNCTION; INHIBITION; ASPIRIN; THROMBELASTOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jss.2017.01.008
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Antiplatelet (AP) medication use is common among trauma patients and is associated with poor outcomes. Management options for platelet dysfunction in trauma patients are controversial, expensive, and potentially harmful. Although light transmission platelet aggregometry is considered the standard test to assess platelet function, it is cumbersome and not generally available. Currently, there are no widely accepted platelet function point-of-care tests for acute trauma. Study design: Prospective observational study from 2014 to 2015. Baseline Multiplate aggregometry aspirin area under the platelet aggregation curve (ASPI AUC), Thrombelastography Platelet Mapping percent inhibition of arachidonic acid (TEG-PM AA), and VerifyNow Aspirin Test (ARU) were compared for ability to detect any AP medication use (aspirin or clopidogrel), platelet dysfunction, and identify patients at risk for intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) progression by calculating the area under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values. Adenosine diphosphate assays were similarly evaluated. Results: Sixty-four patients were enrolled, 25 were taking AP medications. AP patients were older (71.6 versus 35.0 y, P < 0.001) and received more platelet transfusions, but other baseline characteristics were similar. Median ASPI AUC (22.0 versus 53.5 P < 0.001) and VerifyNow ARU (503.5 versus 629.0, P < 0.001) were lower, whereas TEG-PM AA (51.8% versus 18.3%, P < 0.001) was higher in AP patients. Multiplate ASPI AUC, TEG-PM AA percent inhibition, and VerifyNow ARU could identify AP medication use (AUC: 0.90, 0.77, and 0.90, respectively). Adenosine diphosphate assays did not correlate with AP medication use in this population. TEG-PM AA percent inhibition and VerifyNow ARU correlated well with Multiplate ASPI AUC to identify platelet dysfunction (AUC: 0.78, 0.89, respectively). ICH occurred in 29 patients; 12 of which had progression of their injury. ASPI AUC (AUC: 0.50) and VerifyNow ARU (AUC: 0.59) did not correlate, and TEG-PM AA percent inhibition (AUC: 0.66) minimally correlated with progression. Conclusions: Multiplate, TEG-PM, and VerifyNow are useful point-of-care tests which identify AP medication use and platelet dysfunction in trauma patients. Initial TEG-PM AA percent inhibition may be associated with risk for ICH progression. However, additional large, prospective studies are needed. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:260 / 269
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Point-of-care thrombelastography assays for coagulopathy in trauma patients
    Craft, R.
    Carroll, R.
    Langdon, R.
    Clanton, C.
    Snider, C.
    Lawson, C.
    Enderson, B.
    Kurek, S.
    TRANSFUSION, 2008, 48 (02) : 81A - 81A
  • [2] Monitoring antiplatelet therapy with point-of-care platelet function assays: a review of the evidence
    van Werkum, Jochem W.
    Hackeng, Christian M.
    Smit, Jaap-Jan J.
    van't Hof, Arnoud W. J.
    Verheugt, Freek W. A.
    ten Berg, Jurrien M.
    FUTURE CARDIOLOGY, 2008, 4 (01) : 33 - 55
  • [3] Point-of-Care Platelet Function Testing
    Harle, Christopher C.
    SEMINARS IN CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2007, 11 (04) : 247 - 251
  • [4] Point-of-care assessment of platelet function in the peri-operative period
    Melikian, C. N.
    James, K.
    Mallett, S. V.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2008, 63 (02) : 217 - 217
  • [5] Assessment of platelet function in healthy cats in response to commonly prescribed antiplatelet drugs using three point-of-care platelet function tests
    Ho, Kimberly K.
    Abrams-Ogg, Anthony C. G.
    Wood, R. Darren
    O'Sullivan, M. Lynne
    Kirby, Gordon M.
    Blois, Shauna L.
    JOURNAL OF FELINE MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2017, 19 (06) : 638 - 647
  • [6] Platelet Function Analysis with Point-of-Care Methods
    Goerlinger, Klaus
    Jambor, Csilla
    Dirkmann, Daniel
    Dusse, Fabian
    Hanke, Alexander
    Adamzik, Michael
    Hartmann, Matthias
    Philipp, Sebastian
    Weber, Artur-Aron
    Rahe-Meyer, Niels
    HERZ, 2008, 33 (04) : 297 - 305
  • [7] Point-of-Care Platelet Function Monitoring: Implications for Patients With Platelet Inhibitors in Cardiac Surgery
    Bolliger, Daniel
    Lance, Marcus D.
    Siegemund, Martin
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2021, 35 (04) : 1049 - 1059
  • [8] Point-of-Care Coagulation Monitoring in Trauma Patients
    Stein, Philipp
    Kaserer, Alexander
    Spahn, Gabriela H.
    Spahn, Donat R.
    SEMINARS IN THROMBOSIS AND HEMOSTASIS, 2017, 43 (04): : 367 - 374
  • [9] Streamlining point-of-care assays
    不详
    NATURE BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2023, 7 (12) : 1531 - 1532
  • [10] Streamlining point-of-care assays
    Nature Biomedical Engineering, 2023, 7 : 1531 - 1532