Making Decision-Making Visible-Teaching the Process of Evaluating Interventions

被引:3
|
作者
Benfield, Angela [1 ]
Krueger, Robert B. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Hlth Profess, Occupat Therapy Program, La Crosse, WI 54601 USA
[2] Whitworth Univ, Entry Level Doctor Occupat Therapy, Spokane, WA 97149 USA
关键词
evidence-based practice; clinical reasoning; causal model; intervention theory; concept mapping; INDUCED MOVEMENT THERAPY; IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE; REFLECTIVE PRACTICE; SELF-ASSESSMENT; CONCEPT MAPS; KNOWLEDGE; SYSTEMS; CARE; MODEL; REDUCTIONISM;
D O I
10.3390/ijerph18073635
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Significant efforts in the past decades to teach evidence-based practice (EBP) implementation has emphasized increasing knowledge of EBP and developing interventions to support adoption to practice. These efforts have resulted in only limited sustained improvements in the daily use of evidence-based interventions in clinical practice in most health professions. Many new interventions with limited evidence of effectiveness are readily adopted each year-indicating openness to change is not the problem. The selection of an intervention is the outcome of an elaborate and complex cognitive process, which is shaped by how they represent the problem in their mind and is mostly invisible processes to others. Therefore, the complex thinking process that support appropriate adoption of interventions should be taught more explicitly. Making the process visible to clinicians increases the acquisition of the skills required to judiciously select one intervention over others. The purpose of this paper is to provide a review of the selection process and the critical analysis that is required to appropriately decide to trial or not trial new intervention strategies with patients.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] TEACHING DECISION-MAKING IN GEOSCIENCE COURSES
    REGER, JP
    JOURNAL OF GEOLOGICAL EDUCATION, 1983, 31 (04) : 304 - 306
  • [42] A SHARED DECISION-MAKING APPROACH TO EVALUATING, SEQUENCING, AND COMBINING INTERVENTIONS IN TEENAGERS WITH ADHD
    Stein, Mark A.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 2020, 59 (10): : S14 - S14
  • [43] The Relationship Decision Making Box: A Questionnaire for Exploring the Decision-Making Process
    Larsen, Nate
    Gray, Malcolm
    Eckstein, Daniel
    FAMILY JOURNAL, 2014, 22 (02): : 222 - 225
  • [44] GUIDELINES FOR SELECTING AND EVALUATING READING SOFTWARE - IMPROVING THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS
    SCOTT, D
    BARKER, J
    READING TEACHER, 1987, 40 (09): : 884 - 887
  • [45] Evaluating the impact of information security on enhancing the business decision-making process
    Jalal-Karim, Akram
    WORLD JOURNAL OF ENTREPRENEURSHIP MANAGEMENT AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2013, 9 (01) : 55 - 64
  • [46] Development of a computer application to help in the decision-making process in teaching dentistry
    Rios Santos, Jose Vicente
    Castello Castaneda, Coral
    Bullon, Pedro
    MEDICINA ORAL PATOLOGIA ORAL Y CIRUGIA BUCAL, 2008, 13 (01): : E65 - E70
  • [47] The Translator's Decision-making Process: Towards a Methodology of Teaching Translation
    Bogucki, Lukasz
    INTERPRETER AND TRANSLATOR TRAINER, 2012, 6 (01): : 131 - 135
  • [48] Shared Decision-Making Is Not Patient Decision-Making
    Birnbrich, Alysa
    McCulloch, Patrick C.
    Kraeutler, Matthew J.
    SPORTS HEALTH-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY APPROACH, 2023, 15 (04): : 615 - 616
  • [49] Decision-Making for Preventive Interventions in Asymptomatic Patients
    Raabe, Andreas
    Fischer, Urs
    Rothwell, Peter M.
    Luengo-Fernandez, Ramon
    Bervini, David
    Goldberg, Johannes
    Trelle, Sven
    Gralla, Jan
    Beck, Juergen
    Zubak, Irena
    STROKE, 2024, 55 (07) : 1951 - 1955
  • [50] The acceptability of behavioural interventions in financial decision-making
    de Jonge, Patricia
    Ungureanu, Olga
    Zeelenberg, Marcel
    Verlegh, Peeter W. J.
    BEHAVIOURAL PUBLIC POLICY, 2024, 8 (04) : 759 - 772