Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Sacubitril/Valsartan versus Ramipril in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

被引:40
|
作者
Rezq, Ahmed [1 ,2 ]
Saad, Marwan [1 ,3 ]
El Nozahi, Mostafa [1 ]
机构
[1] Ain Shams Univ, Dept Cardiol, Abbassia Sq, Cairo, Egypt
[2] Dar Al Fouad Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Cairo, Egypt
[3] Brown Univ, Warren Alpert Med Sch, Cardiovasc Inst, Providence, RI 02912 USA
来源
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.12.037
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The role of sacubitril and/or valsartan in patient with heart failure (HF) is established. Whether sacubitril and/or valsartan plays a role in improving outcomes in patients after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is unknown. The current study aims to comparing the efficacy and safety of sacubitril and/or valsartan versus ramipril in post-STEMI patients. Patients presenting with STEMI were randomized to receive either sacubitril and/or valsartan or ramipril after primary percutaneous coronary intervention. The main efficacy endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 30 days and 6 months, defined as a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and HF hospitalizations. Multiple secondary clinical safety and efficacy endpoints were examined. A total of 200 patients were randomized from January 2018 to March 2019, mean age 54.5 +/- 10.4, 87% men, 75% presented with anterior wall STEMI. Baseline clinical and echocardiographic characteristics were comparable between groups. The primary endpoint of MACE was similar with sacubitril/valsartan versus ramipril at 30 days (p = 0.18); however, at 6 months, sacubitril/valsartan was associated with significant reduction of MACE (p = 0.005), mainly driven by reduction in HF hospitalizations (18% vs 36%, OR 0.40, 95% 0.22 to 0.75; p = 0.004). At 6 months, LV ejection fraction was higher with sacubitril/valsartan (46.8 +/- 12.5% vs 42.09 +/- 13.8%; p = 0.012), with improved LV remodelling (LV end diastolic dimension 50.6 +/- 3.9 mm vs 53.2 +/- 2.7 mm, p = 0.047; and LV end systolic dimension 36.1 +/- 3.4 mm versus 39.9 +/- 6.3 mm, p = 0.001) compared with ramipril. No difference in other efficacy or safety clinical endpoints was observed. In conclusion, early initiation of sacubitril/valsartan may offer clinical benefit and improvement in myocardial remodelling in post-STEMI patients. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:7 / 13
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Usefulness of the CODE ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Program to Improve Quality Assurance in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
    Ginanjar, Eka
    Sjaaf, Amal C.
    Alwi, Idrus
    Sulistiadi, Wahyu
    Darmawan, Ede Surya
    Wibowo, Adik
    Liastuti, Lies Dina
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2022, 165 : 27 - 32
  • [32] Infarct characteristics and outcome of patients with transient ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction compared to ST-segment and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
    Demirkiran, A.
    Hoeven, N.
    Janssens, G.
    Lemkes, J.
    Everaars, H.
    Ven, P.
    Cauteren, Y.
    Leeuwen, M.
    Nap, A.
    Bekkers, S.
    Royen, N.
    Smulders, M.
    Rossum, A.
    Robbers, L.
    Nijveldt, R.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2020, 41 : 195 - 195
  • [33] Comparison of Angiographic and Other Findings and Mortality in Non ST-Segment Elevation versus ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Patients Undergoing Early Invasive Intervention
    Bin Song, Young
    Hahn, Joo-Yong
    Kim, Ju Han
    Lee, Sang-Yeup
    Choi, Soo-Hee
    Choi, Jin-Ho
    Choi, Seung-Hyuk
    Lee, Sang Hoon
    Yoon, Junghan
    Kim, Young Jo
    Jeong, Myung-Ho
    Gwon, Hyeon-Cheol
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2010, 106 (10): : 1397 - 1403
  • [34] The value of sacubitril/valsartan in acute anterior wall ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction before emergency Percutaneous coronary intervention
    Lin, Guoli
    Chen, Wen
    Wu, Meifang
    Dai, Caizhi
    Xu, Kaizu
    CARDIOLOGY, 2022, 147 (5-6) : 479 - 485
  • [35] The 12-month Clinical Outcomes of Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction versus Acute Non ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Patients with Previous Acute Myocardial Infarction
    Wang, Lin
    Rha, Seung Woon
    Park, Ji Young
    Poddar, Kanhaiva L.
    Choi, Byoung Geol
    Kim, Ji Bak
    Shin, Seoung Yong
    Choi, Un Jung
    Choi, Cheol Ung Choi
    Lim, Hong Euy
    Kim, Jin Won
    Kim, Eung Ju
    Park, Chang Gyu
    Seo, Hong Seog
    Oh, Dong Joo
    Ahn, Young Keun
    Jeong, Myung Ho
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2009, 104 (6A): : 120D - 120D
  • [36] Clinical efficacy of sacubitril-valsartan combined with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction after reperfusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhang, Dong
    Wu, Hui
    Liu, Di
    Li, Yunzhao
    Zhou, Gang
    Yang, QingZhuo
    Liu, YanFang
    FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2022, 9
  • [38] Electrocardiographic ST-segment elevation: Takotsubo cardiomyopathy versus ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction-A case series
    Barker, Sarah
    Solomon, Hemant
    Bergin, James D.
    Huff, J. Stephen
    Brady, William J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2009, 27 (02): : 220 - 226
  • [39] The impact of anemia in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
    Caldeira, D.
    Morgado, G. J.
    Cruz, I.
    Martins, C.
    Pereira, H.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2016, 37 : 1181 - 1181
  • [40] Cardioprotection with adenosine in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
    Kardesoglu, Ejder
    Yalcin, Murat
    Isilak, Zafer
    Uz, Omer
    Atalay, Murat
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 125 (18) : 3343 - 3343