Protection of animals against cruelty:: Transport of cattle, sheep, goats and pigs

被引:5
|
作者
Dousek, J
Vecerek, V
Valcl, O
Chloupek, P
Pistéková, V
机构
[1] State Vet Adm, Prague, Czech Republic
[2] Univ Vet & Pharmaceut Sci, Brno, Czech Republic
关键词
cattle; pigs; transport; animal protection; surveillance;
D O I
10.2754/avb200271040555
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
The inspections carried out by the officers of the State Veterinary Administration (SVA) within the framework of surveillance of animal transport revealed that cases of violation of the principles of animal protection may and do occur. Therefore evaluation was made of transport in selected groups of cattle, sheep, goats and pigs in the Czech Republic during the period of 1996 to 2001. Each inspection was assessed using the following scale: (1) animal protection requirements fulfilled, (2) animal protection requirements partially fulfilled and veterinary measures for the improvement of animal protection imposed, (3) failure to fulfil animal protection requirements. The proportion of the situations of when animal protection requirements were partially met and veterinary measures were imposed to improve the level of protection in cattle varied between 0.00% and 1.35% of the total number of the inspections carried out. In sheep and goats this situation occurred only sporadically. In pigs the proportion was 0.22% to 2.22% of the total number of the inspections carried out. The proportion of the situations when failure to fulfil animal protection requirements in cattle occurred varied between 0.00% and 0.83% of the total number of the inspections carried out. In sheep this situation occurred in a single case only and in goats no such situation was recorded. In pigs the same proportion varied between 0.00% and 3.31%. We compared the results of the period 1996 to 1998 with the period of 1999 to 2001. The proportion of the situations with partial fulfilment of animal protection requirements and subsequent necessity to impose veterinary measures increased in cattle from 0.53% to 0.82% and in pigs from 0.65% to 1.09%. The proportion of the situations of failure to fulfil animal protection requirements increased in cattle from 0.00% to 0.37%, and in pigs from 0.33% to 1.33% showing a significant trend towards deterioration of these conditions (P = 0.0406). The results obtained by this detailed analysis show that animal protection has not improved in the interval under study. Our evaluation further shows that it is inevitable to continue the supervisory activities by SVA inspectors and to improve all aspects of animal protection as well as amend the standing legislation.
引用
收藏
页码:555 / 562
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The presence of environmental pollutants in the follicular fluid of farm animals (cattle, sheep, goats, and pigs)
    Kamarianos, A
    Karamanlis, X
    Goulas, P
    Theodosiadou, E
    Smokovitis, A
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE TOXICOLOGY, 2003, 17 (02) : 185 - 190
  • [2] BONDING OF GOATS TO SHEEP AND CATTLE FOR PROTECTION FROM PREDATORS
    HULET, CV
    ANDERSON, DM
    SMITH, JN
    SHUPE, WL
    TAYLOR, CA
    MURRAY, LW
    [J]. APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE, 1989, 22 (3-4) : 261 - 267
  • [4] CONGENITAL-ABNORMALITIES OF THE GENITALIA OF CATTLE, SHEEP, GOATS, AND PIGS
    LADDS, PW
    [J]. VETERINARY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA-FOOD ANIMAL PRACTICE, 1993, 9 (01) : 127 - 144
  • [5] Animal welfare aspects in respect of the slaughter or killing of pregnant livestock animals (cattle, pigs, sheep, goats, horses)
    More, Simon
    Bicout, Dominique
    Botner, Anette
    Butterworth, Andrew
    Calistri, Paolo
    Depner, Klaus
    Edwards, Sandra
    Garin-Bastuji, Bruno
    Good, Margaret
    Schmidt, Christian Gortazar
    Michel, Virginie
    Miranda, Miguel Angel
    Nielsen, Soren Saxmose
    Velarde, Antonio
    Thulke, Hans-Hermann
    Sihvonen, Liisa
    Spoolder, Hans
    Stegeman, Jan Arend
    Raj, Mohan
    Willeberg, Preben
    Candiani, Denise
    Winckler, Christoph
    [J]. EFSA JOURNAL, 2017, 15 (05)
  • [6] Women Against Cruelty: Protection of Animals in Nineteenth-Century Britain
    Adelman, Juliana
    [J]. VICTORIAN STUDIES, 2022, 64 (02) : 316 - 317
  • [7] Women against cruelty: protection of animals in nineteenth-century Britain
    Hamlett, Jane
    [J]. WOMENS HISTORY REVIEW, 2022, 31 (01) : 162 - 164
  • [8] Women against Cruelty: Protection of Animals in Nineteenth-Century Britain
    Wrenn, Corey Lee
    [J]. SOCIETY & ANIMALS, 2020, 28 (04) : 437 - 439
  • [9] Pain Management in Farm Animals: Focus on Cattle, Sheep and Pigs
    Steagall, Paulo V.
    Bustamante, Hedie
    Johnson, Craig B.
    Turner, Patricia V.
    [J]. ANIMALS, 2021, 11 (06):
  • [10] Women Against Cruelty. Protection of Animals in Nineteenth-Century Britain
    Guazzaloca, Giulia
    [J]. RICERCHE DI STORIA POLITICA, 2021, 24 (02) : 232 - 234