Animal welfare aspects in respect of the slaughter or killing of pregnant livestock animals (cattle, pigs, sheep, goats, horses)

被引:25
|
作者
More, Simon
Bicout, Dominique
Botner, Anette
Butterworth, Andrew
Calistri, Paolo
Depner, Klaus
Edwards, Sandra
Garin-Bastuji, Bruno
Good, Margaret
Schmidt, Christian Gortazar
Michel, Virginie
Miranda, Miguel Angel
Nielsen, Soren Saxmose
Velarde, Antonio
Thulke, Hans-Hermann
Sihvonen, Liisa
Spoolder, Hans
Stegeman, Jan Arend
Raj, Mohan
Willeberg, Preben
Candiani, Denise
Winckler, Christoph
机构
关键词
Slaughter; pregnant animals; livestock species; animal welfare; conscious perception; pain; fetus; UMBILICAL-CORD OCCLUSION; NONPENETRATING CAPTIVE-BOLT; UNANESTHETIZED FETAL LAMBS; BRAIN-STEM; BREATHING MOVEMENTS; PLASMA ADENOSINE; BLOOD-FLOW; ELECTROCORTICAL ACTIVITY; RESPIRATORY MOVEMENTS; ENDOGENOUS ADENOSINE;
D O I
10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4782
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
This scientific opinion addresses animal welfare aspects of slaughtering of livestock pregnant animals. Term of Reference (ToR) 1 requested assessment of the prevalence of animals slaughtered in a critical developmental stage of gestation when the livestock fetuses might experience negative affect. Limited data on European prevalence and related uncertainties necessitated a structured expert knowledge elicitation (EKE) exercise. Estimated median percentages of animals slaughtered in the last third of gestation are 3%, 1.5%, 0.5%, 0.8% and 0.2% (dairy cows, beef cattle, pigs, sheep and goats, respectively). Pregnant animals may be sent for slaughter for health, welfare, management and economic reasons (ToR2); there are also reasons for farmers not knowing that animals sent for slaughter are pregnant. Measures to reduce the incidence are listed. ToR3 asked whether livestock fetuses can experience pain and other negative affect. The available literature was reviewed and, at a second multidisciplinary EKE meeting, judgements and uncertainty were elicited. It is concluded that livestock fetuses in the last third of gestation have the anatomical and neurophysiological structures required to experience negative affect (with 90-100% likelihood). However, there are two different possibilities whether they perceive negative affect. It is more probable that the neurophysiological situation does not allow for conscious perception (with 66-99% likelihood) because of brain inhibitory mechanisms. There is also a less probable situation that livestock fetuses can experience negative affect (with 1-33% likelihood) arising from differences in the interpretation of the fetal electroencephalogram, observed responses to external stimuli and the possibility of fetal learning. Regarding methods to stun and kill livestock fetuses at slaughter (ToR4), sets of scenarios and respective actions take account of both the probable and less probable situation regarding fetal ability for conscious perception. Finally, information was collated on methods to establish the dam's gestational stage based on physical features of livestock fetuses (ToR5). (C) 2017 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority.
引用
收藏
页数:96
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] Animal welfare in terms of lung health in cattle, pigs, sheep and goats assessed at slaughter
    Valkova, Lenka
    Voslarova, Eva
    Conte, Francesca
    Vecerek, Vladimir
    [J]. ACTA VETERINARIA BRNO, 2024, 93 (01) : 77 - 85
  • [2] Prevalence of heart lesions in cattle, pigs, sheep and goats detected during veterinary checks in slaughterhouses with respect to animal welfare
    Valkova, Lenka
    Voslarova, Eva
    Passantino, Annamaria
    Vecerek, Vladimir
    [J]. ACTA VETERINARIA BRNO, 2024, 93 (02) : 251 - 258
  • [3] Welfare of sheep and goats during killing for purposes other than slaughter
    Nielsen, Soren Saxmose
    Alvarez, Julio
    Bicout, Dominique Joseph
    Calistri, Paolo
    Canali, Elisabetta
    Drewe, Julian Ashley
    Garin-Bastuji, Bruno
    Gonzales Rojas, Jose Luis
    Gortazar Schmidt, Christian
    Herskin, Mette
    Chueca, Miguel Angel Miranda
    Padalino, Barbara
    Roberts, Helen Clare
    Spoolder, Hans
    Stahl, Karl
    Velarde, Antonio
    Viltrop, Arvo
    Winckler, Christoph
    Raj, Mohan
    Candiani, Denise
    Van der Stede, Yves
    Michel, Virginie
    [J]. EFSA JOURNAL, 2024, 22 (06)
  • [4] Animal Welfare EFSA-Report on the Slaughter of pregnant Animals
    不详
    [J]. FLEISCHWIRTSCHAFT, 2017, 97 (09): : 52 - 53
  • [5] Livestock-handling assessments to improve the welfare of cattle, pigs and sheep
    Grandin, T.
    [J]. ANIMAL PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 2018, 58 (03) : 403 - 407
  • [6] Protection of animals against cruelty:: Transport of cattle, sheep, goats and pigs
    Dousek, J
    Vecerek, V
    Valcl, O
    Chloupek, P
    Pistéková, V
    [J]. ACTA VETERINARIA BRNO, 2002, 71 (04) : 555 - 562
  • [7] Jenzerwurz and Chaeslichrut Herbal Home Remedies for Cattle, Sheep, Goats, Pigs and Horses
    Brendieck-Worm, Cacilia
    [J]. SCHWEIZERISCHE ZEITSCHRIFT FUER GANZHEITSMEDIZIN, 2014, 26 (02): : 119 - 119
  • [9] Technical developments concerning electrical stunning of slaughter pigs - Animal welfare aspects
    Troeger, K
    Nitsch, P
    [J]. FLEISCHWIRTSCHAFT, 1998, 78 (11): : 1134 - +
  • [10] The presence of environmental pollutants in the follicular fluid of farm animals (cattle, sheep, goats, and pigs)
    Kamarianos, A
    Karamanlis, X
    Goulas, P
    Theodosiadou, E
    Smokovitis, A
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE TOXICOLOGY, 2003, 17 (02) : 185 - 190