Natural history of patients with adhesive small bowel obstruction

被引:197
|
作者
Miller, G
Boman, J
Shrier, I
Gordon, PH
机构
[1] Sir Mortimer B Davis Jewish Gen Hosp, Div Colorectal Surg, Montreal, PQ H3T 1E2, Canada
[2] Sir Mortimer B Davis Jewish Gen Hosp, Ctr Epidemiol & Community Studies, Montreal, PQ H3T 1E2, Canada
[3] McGill Univ, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1046/j.1365-2168.2000.01530.x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Small bowel obstruction (SBO) is a major cause of morbidity and financial expenditure. The goals of this study were to determine factors predisposing to adhesive SBO, to note the long-term prognosis and recurrence rates for operative and non-operative treatment, to elicit the complication rate of operations and to highlight factors predictive of recurrence. Methods: The medical records of all patients admitted to one hospital between 1986 and 1996 with the diagnosis of SBO were reviewed retrospectively. This included 410 patients accounting for 675 admissions. Results: The frequency of previous operation by procedure type was colorectal surgery (24 per cent), followed by gynaecological surgery (22 per cent), herniorrhaphy (15 per cent) and appendicectomy (14 per cent). A history of colorectal surgery (odds 2.7) and vertical incisions (odds 2.5) tended to predispose to multiple matted adhesions rather than an obstructive band. At initial admission 36 per cent of patients were treated by means of operation. As the number of admissions increased, the recurrence rate increased while the time interval between admissions decreased. Patients with an adhesive band had a 25 per cent readmission rate, compared with a 49 per cent rate for patients with matted adhesions (P < 0.004). At the initial admission 36 per cent of patients were treated surgically. Patients treated without operation had a 34 per cent readmission rate, compared with 32 per cent for those treated surgically (P not significant), a shorter time to readmission (median 0.7 versus 2.0 years; P < 0.05), no difference in reoperation rate (14 versus 11 per cent; P not significant) and fewer inpatient days over all admissions (4 versus 12 days; P < 0.0001). Conclusion: The likelihood of reobstruction increases and the time to reobstruction decreases with increasing number of previous episodes of obstruction. Patients with matted adhesions have a greater recurrence rate than those with band adhesions. Non-operative treatment for adhesions in stable patients results in a shorter hospital stay and similar recurrence and reoperation rates, but a reduced interval to reobstruction when compared with operative treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:1240 / 1247
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Patients With Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction Should Be Primarily Managed by a Surgical Team
    Aquina, Christopher T.
    Becerra, Adan Z.
    Probst, Christian P.
    Xu, Zhaomin
    Hensley, Bradley J.
    Iannuzzi, James C.
    Noyes, Katia
    Monson, John R. T.
    Fleming, Fergal J.
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2016, 264 (03) : 437 - 447
  • [32] Randomized clinical study of Gastrografin® administration in patients with adhesive small bowel obstruction
    Biondo, S
    Parés, D
    Mora, L
    Ragué, JM
    Kreisler, E
    Jaurrieta, E
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2003, 90 (05) : 542 - 546
  • [33] Predicting Intestinal Ischaemia in Patients with Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction: A Simple Score
    Mahdi Bouassida
    Ghazi Laamiri
    Slim Zribi
    Helmi Slama
    Bassem Mroua
    Selim Sassi
    Rania Aboudi
    Mohamed Mongi Mighri
    Khaled Bouzeidi
    Hassen Touinsi
    World Journal of Surgery, 2020, 44 : 1444 - 1449
  • [34] Randomized clinical study of Gastrografin® administration in patients with adhesive small bowel obstruction
    Chintamani, RB
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2003, 90 (09) : 1165 - 1165
  • [35] Postoperative adhesive small bowel obstruction: the resources impacts
    Alwan, MH
    van Rij, AM
    Greig, SF
    NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1999, 112 (1099) : 421 - 423
  • [36] Individualization of the best approach for adhesive small bowel obstruction
    Sebastian-Valverde, Enric
    Tellez, Clara
    Burdio, Fernando
    Poves, Ignasi
    Grande, Luis
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2023, 93 (09) : 2132 - 2137
  • [37] OUTCOME OF CONSERVATIVE MANAGEMENT OF ADHESIVE SMALL BOWEL OBSTRUCTION
    Hussain, Mohammad
    Ali, Nisar
    Israr, Mohammad
    Ismail, Mohammad
    Naeem, Syed Mohammad
    Ali, Manzoor
    GOMAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2012, 10 (01): : 141 - 143
  • [38] Disease Severity and Cost in Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction
    Hernandez, Matthew C.
    Finnesgard, Eric J.
    Shariq, Omair A.
    Knight, Ariel
    Stephens, Daniel
    Aho, Johnathon M.
    Kim, Brian D.
    Schiller, Henry J.
    Zielinski, Martin D.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 43 (12) : 3027 - 3034
  • [39] Gastrografin for uncomplicated adhesive small bowel obstruction in children
    A. Bonnard
    J. Kohaut
    A. Sieurin
    N. Belarbi
    A. El Ghoneimi
    Pediatric Surgery International, 2011, 27 : 1277 - 1281
  • [40] Adhesive small bowel obstruction:: course and practical consequences
    Sos, VJE
    Yepes, VA
    Vizcaíno, VS
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ENFERMEDADES DIGESTIVAS, 2003, 95 (05) : 328 - 332