Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Modified Live Virus Vaccine: A "Leaky" Vaccine with Debatable Efficacy and Safety

被引:71
|
作者
Zhou, Lei [1 ]
Ge, Xinna [1 ]
Yang, Hanchun [1 ]
机构
[1] China Agr Univ, Coll Vet Med, Minist Agr & Rural Affairs, Key Lab Anim Epidemiol, Beijing 100193, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV); modified live virus (MLV) vaccine; attenuation; heterologous cross-protection; safety; reversion to virulence; recombination;
D O I
10.3390/vaccines9040362
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) caused by the PRRS virus (PRRSV) is one of the most economically important diseases, that has significantly impacted the global pork industry for over three decades, since it was first recognized in the United States in the late 1980s. Attributed to the PRRSV extensive genetic and antigenic variation and rapid mutability and evolution, nearly worldwide epidemics have been sustained by a set of emerging and re-emerging virus strains. Since the first modified live virus (MLV) vaccine was commercially available, it has been widely used for more than 20 years, for preventing and controlling PRRS. On the one hand, MLV can induce a protective immune response against homologous viruses by lightening the clinical signs of pigs and reducing the virus transmission in the affected herd, as well as helping to cost-effectively increase the production performance on pig farms affected by heterologous viruses. On the other hand, MLV can still replicate in the host, inducing viremia and virus shedding, and it fails to confer sterilizing immunity against PRRSV infection, that may accelerate viral mutation or recombination to adapt the host and to escape from the immune response, raising the risk of reversion to virulence. The unsatisfied heterologous cross-protection and safety issue of MLV are two debatable characterizations, which raise the concerns that whether it is necessary or valuable to use this leaky vaccine to protect the field viruses with a high probability of being heterologous. To provide better insights into the immune protection and safety related to MLV, recent advances and opinions on PRRSV attenuation, protection efficacy, immunosuppression, recombination, and reversion to virulence are reviewed here, hoping to give a more comprehensive recognition on MLV and to motivate scientific inspiration on novel strategies and approaches of developing the next generation of PRRS vaccine.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Evaluation of the effect of a porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) modified-live virus vaccine on sow reproductive performance in endemic PRRS farms
    Jeong, Jiwoon
    Kim, Seeun
    Park, Kee Hwan
    Kang, Ikjae
    Park, Su-Jin
    Park, Changhoon
    Chae, Chanhee
    VETERINARY MICROBIOLOGY, 2017, 208 : 47 - 52
  • [32] Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus: Challenges and Advances in Vaccine Development
    He, Zhan
    Li, Fangfang
    Liu, Min
    Liao, Jiali
    Guo, Chunhe
    VACCINES, 2025, 13 (03)
  • [33] Efficacy and duration of protection induced by a modified live virus vaccine in protecting pregnant gilts from a virulent heterologous European strain of Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus
    Medveczky, I
    Kulcsár, G
    Makranszki, L
    Pesch, S
    Glávits, R
    Schagemann, G
    Schütz, B
    TIERARZTLICHE UMSCHAU, 2002, 57 (03): : 137 - 142
  • [34] Safety and long-lasting immunity of the combined administration of a modified-live virus vaccine against porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus 1 and an inactivated vaccine against porcine parvovirus and Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae in breeding pigs
    Sanchez-Matamoros, Almudena
    Camprodon, Agusti
    Maldonado, Jaime
    Pedrazuela, Rafael
    Miranda, Joel
    PORCINE HEALTH MANAGEMENT, 2019, 5 (1)
  • [35] Tonsilar crypt exudate to evaluate shedding and transmission of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus after inoculation with live field virus or vaccination with modified live virus vaccine
    Fangman, Thomas J.
    Kleiboeker, Steve B.
    Coleman, Melinda
    JOURNAL OF SWINE HEALTH AND PRODUCTION, 2007, 15 (04): : 219 - 223
  • [36] Safety and long-lasting immunity of the combined administration of a modified-live virus vaccine against porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus 1 and an inactivated vaccine against porcine parvovirus and Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae in breeding pigs
    Almudena Sánchez-Matamoros
    Agustí Camprodon
    Jaime Maldonado
    Rafael Pedrazuela
    Joel Miranda
    Porcine Health Management, 5
  • [37] Methods of control and elimination of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus using modified live vaccine in a two-site production system
    Gillespie, TG
    Carroll, AL
    JOURNAL OF SWINE HEALTH AND PRODUCTION, 2003, 11 (06): : 291 - 295
  • [38] Effect of vaccination with a modified live porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus vaccine on growth performance in fattening pigs under field conditions
    Lyoo, Kwang-Soo
    Choi, Jong-Young
    Hahn, Tae-Wook
    Park, Kun Taek
    Kim, Hye Kwon
    JOURNAL OF VETERINARY MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2016, 78 (09): : 1533 - 1536
  • [39] Transition from one commercial porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome modified -live virus vaccine to another in a breeding herd and impact on productivity
    Risser, Jessica
    Ackerman, Matthew
    Lape, Dylan
    Jordon, Jon
    Puls, Christopher L.
    JOURNAL OF SWINE HEALTH AND PRODUCTION, 2024, 32 (03): : 98 - 104
  • [40] Phenotypic and Genetic Evolutions of a Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Modified Live Vaccine after Limited Passages in Pigs
    Eclercy, Julie
    Renson, Patricia
    Hirchaud, Edouard
    Andraud, Mathieu
    Beven, Veronique
    Paboeuf, Frederic
    Rose, Nicolas
    Blanchard, Yannick
    Bourry, Olivier
    VACCINES, 2021, 9 (04)