Rechallenging Recurrent Glioblastoma with Intra-Arterial Bevacizumab with Blood Brain-Barrier Disruption Results in Radiographic Response

被引:12
|
作者
Faltings, Lukas [1 ]
Kulason, Kay O. [1 ]
Patel, Nitesh, V [1 ]
Wong, Tamika [2 ]
Fralin, Sherese [2 ]
Li, Mona [2 ]
Schneider, Julia R. [1 ]
Filippi, Christopher G. [3 ,4 ]
Langer, David J. [1 ,2 ]
Ortiz, Rafael [1 ,2 ]
Boockvar, John A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Lenox Hill Hosp, Zucker Sch Med Hofstra Northwell, Dept Neurosurg, New York, NY 10021 USA
[2] Lenox Hill Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Brain Tumor Ctr, New York, NY 10021 USA
[3] Lenox Hill Hosp, Dept Radiol, Div Neuroradial, New York, NY 10021 USA
[4] Zucker Sch Med Hofstra Northwell, Dept Radiol, Manhasset, NY USA
关键词
Bevacizumab; Blood-brain barrier disruption; Glioblastoma; Intra-arterial; Recurrent GBM; Vascular endothelial growth factor; ANTIANGIOGENIC THERAPY; ADJUVANT TEMOZOLOMIDE; CEREBRAL INFUSION; MALIGNANT GLIOMA; RADIOTHERAPY; PROGRESSION; CONCOMITANT; IRINOTECAN; RESISTANT; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.wneu.2019.07.137
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: High-dose bevacizumab delivered via super selective intraarterial cerebral infusion (SIACI) is one promising clinical trial combination for patients with glioblastoma (GBM). Although both continuous intravenous and intra-arterial administration of bevacizumab, and rechallenge with intravenous bevacizumab, have demonstrated improved survival, this is the first description of rechallenging GBM with SIACI of bevacizumab. CASE DESCRIPTION: We report a case of a 43-year-old woman with recurrent GBM who had received treatment from 3 clinical trials, including a rechallenge with SIACI of bevacizumab. First, she enrolled into a phase I/II trial for patients newly diagnosed with GBM (NCT01811498) and received 3 doses of SIACI bevacizumab over 180 days in addition to standard of care chemotherapy and radiation. Following progression, as indicated on her magnetic resonance imaging scan, she consented for a separate clinical trial for her disease and received 2 cycles of temozolomide with an investigational agent. The patient was removed from the study on tumor progression. Subsequently, she was rechallenged with SIACI of bevacizumab via a third clinical trial (NCT01269853) and then completed 3 intravenous infusions. After completing the third trial, her magnetic resonance imaging scan demonstrated improvement based on Response Assessment In Neuro-Oncology criteria. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report to highlight the effect of rechallenging a patient with SIACI of bevacizumab following disease progression after initial bevacizumab treatment and subsequent alternate clinical trial failure. There is a need to conduct further clinical trials to evaluate the benefits of rechallenge with SIACI versus intravenous bevacizumab for GBM and further explore theories of bevacizumab resistance.
引用
收藏
页码:234 / 241
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Intra-arterial delivery of AAVrh.10CLN2 after blood brain barrier disruption supports widespread gene expression in the murine brain
    Foley, Conor
    Rubin, David
    Santillan, Alejandro
    Sondhi, Dolan
    Crystal, Ronald
    Gobin, Pierre
    Ballon, Douglas
    MOLECULAR GENETICS AND METABOLISM, 2013, 108 (02) : S41 - S41
  • [32] Hyperthermic Laser Ablation of Recurrent Glioblastoma Leads to Temporary Disruption of the Peritumoral Blood Brain Barrier
    Leuthardt, Eric C.
    Duan, Chong
    Kim, Michael J.
    Campian, Jian L.
    Kim, Albert H.
    Miller-Thomas, Michelle M.
    Shimony, Joshua S.
    Tran, David D.
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (02):
  • [34] Brain metastases from gynecological cancers: Intra-arterial chemotherapy with or without blood-brain barrier opening
    Neuwelt, EA
    Murillo, TP
    NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2005, 7 (04) : 525 - 526
  • [35] Blood brain barrier disruption (BBBD) and intra-arterial methotrexate based therapy for newly diagnosed primary CNS lymphoma: The BBBD Consortium Experience
    Angelov, L.
    Doolittle, N. D.
    Siegal, T.
    Kraemer, D. F.
    Peereboom, D.
    Jahnke, K.
    Ference, S.
    Barnett, G.
    McGregor, J.
    Neuwelt, E. A.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 25 (18)
  • [36] Modulating the blood brain barrier to enhance neuroprotection of intra-arterial HUCB administration in acute ischemic stroke
    Yu, G
    Sanberg, CD
    Sanberg, PR
    Hoffer, BJ
    Borlongan, CV
    EXPERIMENTAL NEUROLOGY, 2005, 193 (01) : 265 - 266
  • [37] Sphenopalatine Ganglion Stimulation Upregulates Transport of Intra-Arterial Temozolomide Across the Blood-Brain Barrier
    Theofanis, Thana N.
    Rochani, Ankit
    Schmidt, Richard F.
    Lang, Michael J.
    Stricsek, Geoffrey
    Kaushal, Gagan
    Iacovitti, Lorraine
    Sharan, Ashwini D.
    Rosenwasser, Robert H.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 66 : 44 - 44
  • [38] Super selective intra-arterial cerebral infusion of modern chemotherapeutics after blood–brain barrier disruption: where are we now, and where we are going
    Randy S. D’Amico
    Deepak Khatri
    Noah Reichman
    Nitesh V. Patel
    Tamika Wong
    Sherese R. Fralin
    Mona Li
    Jason A. Ellis
    Rafael Ortiz
    David J. Langer
    John A. Boockvar
    Journal of Neuro-Oncology, 2020, 147 : 261 - 278
  • [39] FUNCTIONAL OPENING OF THE BLOOD-BRAIN-BARRIER ENHANCES THE PANCREATIC SECRETORY RESPONSE TO INTRA-ARTERIAL ADMINISTRATION OF THYROTROPIN-RELEASING-HORMONE
    KATO, Y
    KANNO, T
    BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH-TOKYO, 1983, 4 : 179 - 182
  • [40] Safety and Feasibility of Repeated and Transient Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption by Pulsed Ultrasound in Patients with Recurrent Glioblastoma
    Idbaih, Ahmed
    Canney, Michael
    Belin, Lisa
    Desseaux, Carole
    Vignot, Alexandre
    Bouchoux, Guillaume
    Asquier, Nicolas
    Law-Ye, Bruno
    Leclercq, Delphine
    Bissery, Anne
    De Rycke, Yann
    Trosch, Clementine
    Capelle, Laurent
    Sanson, Marc
    Hoang-Xuan, Khe
    Dehais, Caroline
    Houillier, Caroline
    Laigle-Donadey, Florence
    Mathon, Bertrand
    Andre, Arthur
    Lafon, Cyril
    Chapelon, Jean-Yves
    Delattre, Jean-Yves
    Carpentier, Alexandre
    CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2019, 25 (13) : 3793 - 3801