Mixture models as a method to find present and divergent genes in comparative genomic hybridization studies on bacteria

被引:3
|
作者
Feten, Guri [1 ]
Almoy, Trygve [1 ]
Snipen, Lars [1 ]
Aadra, Agot [1 ]
Nyquist, O. Ludvig [1 ]
Aastveit, Are H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Univ Life Sci, Dept Chem Biotechnol & Food Sci, N-1432 As, Norway
关键词
analysis of variance; comparative genomic hybridization; microarray experiment; mixture models; validation criteria;
D O I
10.1002/bimj.200510286
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) using microarrays is performed on bacteria in order to test for genomic diversity within various bacterial species. The microarrays used for CGH are based on the genome of a fully sequenced bacterium strain, denoted reference strain. Labelled DNA fragments from a sample strain of interest and from the reference strain are hybridized to the array. Based on the obtained ratio intensities and the total intensities of the signals, each gene is classified as either present (one copy or multiple copies) or divergent (zero copies). In this paper mixture models with different number of components are tied on different combinations of variables and compared with each other. The study shows that mixture models fitted on both the ratio intensities and the total intensities including the replicates for each gene improve, compared to previously published methods, the results for several of the data sets tested. Some summaries of the data sets are proposed as a guide for the choice of model and the choice of number of components. The models are applied on data from CGH experiments with the bacteria Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pneumoniae.
引用
收藏
页码:242 / 258
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Array-based comparative genomic hybridization and immunohistochemical studies in gliomatosis cerebri
    Min, H. S.
    Kim, B.
    Park, S. H.
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2007, 87 : 299A - 299A
  • [22] Array-based comparative genomic hybridization and immunohistochernical studies in gliomatosis cerebri
    Min, H. S.
    Kim, B.
    Park, S. H.
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2007, 20 : 299A - 299A
  • [23] Array-based comparative genomic hybridization and immunohistochemical studies in gliomatosis cerebri
    Min, Hye Sook
    Kim, Bomi
    Park, Sung-Hye
    JOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2008, 90 (03) : 259 - 266
  • [24] Array-based comparative genomic hybridization and immunohistochemical studies in gliomatosis cerebri
    Hye Sook Min
    Bomi Kim
    Sung-Hye Park
    Journal of Neuro-Oncology, 2008, 90 : 259 - 266
  • [25] PHOTOPROBE® biotin:: An alternative method for labeling archival DNA for comparative genomic hybridization
    Korinth, D
    Donhuijsen, K
    Bockmühl, U
    Petersen, I
    CELLULAR ONCOLOGY, 2004, 26 (5-6) : 329 - 334
  • [26] Bacterial comparative genomic hybridization: A method for directly identifying lateral gene transfer
    Malloff, CA
    Fernandez, RC
    Lam, WL
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2001, 312 (01) : 1 - 5
  • [27] Machine learning models for lung cancer classification using array comparative genomic hybridization
    Aliferis, CF
    Hardin, D
    Massion, PP
    AMIA 2002 SYMPOSIUM, PROCEEDINGS: BIOMEDICAL INFORMATICS: ONE DISCIPLINE, 2002, : 7 - 11
  • [28] Stochastic segmentation models for array-based comparative genomic hybridization data analysis
    Lai, Tze Leung
    Xing, Haipeng
    Zhang, Nancy
    BIOSTATISTICS, 2008, 9 (02) : 290 - 307
  • [29] Genomic DNA-chip hybridization reveals a higher incidence of genomic amplifications in pancreatic cancer than conventional comparative genomic hybridization and leads to the identification of novel candidate genes
    Holzmann, K
    Kohlhammer, H
    Schwaenen, C
    Wessendorf, S
    Kestler, HA
    Schwoerer, A
    Rau, B
    Radlwimmer, B
    Döhner, H
    Lichter, P
    Gress, T
    Bentz, M
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2004, 64 (13) : 4428 - 4433
  • [30] Construction of evolutionary tree models for nasopharyngeal carcinoma using comparative genomic hybridization data
    Wu, Lawrence Shih-Hsin
    CANCER GENETICS AND CYTOGENETICS, 2006, 168 (02) : 105 - 108