Implementation of routine first-trimester combined screening for preeclampsia based on the Gaussian algorithm: A clinical effectiveness study

被引:3
|
作者
Mendoza, Manel [1 ]
Bonacina, Erika [1 ]
Serrano, Berta [1 ]
Ricart, Marta [2 ]
Martin, Lourdes [3 ]
Lopez-Quesada, Eva [4 ]
Vives, Angels [5 ]
Maroto, Anna [6 ]
Garcia-Manau, Pablo [1 ]
De Antonio, Clementina [1 ]
Tusquets, Cristina [1 ]
Moreano, Gabriela [2 ]
Armengol-Alsina, Mireia [1 ]
Carreras, Elena [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Hosp Univ Vall dHebron, Dept Obstet, Maternal Fetal Med Unit, Passeig Vall dHebron 119-129, Barcelona 08035, Spain
[2] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Hosp Univ Germans Trias & Pujol, Dept Obstet, Maternal Fetal Med Unit, Badalona, Spain
[3] Univ Rovira & Virgili, Hosp Univ Tarragona Joan XXIII, Dept Obstet, Maternal Fetal Med Unit, Tarragona, Spain
[4] Univ Barcelona, Hosp Univ Mutua Terrassa, Dept Obstet, Maternal Fetal Med Unit, Terrassa, Spain
[5] Univ Int Catalunya, Consorci Sanit Terrassa, Dept Obstet, Maternal Fetal Med Unit, Terrassa, Spain
[6] Univ Girona, Hosp Univ Girona Doctor Josep Trueta, Dept Obstet, Maternal Fetal Med Unit, Girona, Spain
关键词
early-onset; first trimester; preeclampsia; screening; uterine artery Doppler; GESTATIONAL-AGE;
D O I
10.1002/ijgo.14192
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of the routine first-trimester screening for preeclampsia (PE) after being implemented in six Catalan maternities. Methods Participants in the reference group were recruited prospectively between October 2015 and September 2017. Participants in the study group were recruited retrospectively between November 2018 and May 2019, after implementing the screening program. PE risk was assessed between 11 + 0 and 13 + 6 weeks of gestation using the Gaussian algorithm combining maternal characteristics, mean arterial blood pressure, uterine artery pulsatility index, and maternal serum pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A. Women with a risk >= 1/137 were prescribed daily salicylic acid (150 mg) until 36 weeks of gestation. Results Preterm PE occurred in 30 of 2641 participants (1.14%) in the reference group, as compared with 18 of 2848 participants (0.63%) in the study group (OR: 0.55; 95% CI, 0.31-0.99; P = 0.045). In the reference group, 37 participants (1.40%) were admitted to ICU, as compared with 23 participants (0.81%) in the study group (OR: 0.57; 95% CI, 0.34-0.96; P = 0.035). Conclusion The routine first-trimester PE screening can be implemented in a public healthcare setting, leading to a significant reduction in the incidence of preterm PE and of maternal ICU admission.
引用
收藏
页码:803 / 809
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Reduction in Preterm Preeclampsia after Contingent First-Trimester Screening and Aspirin Prophylaxis in a Routine Care Setting
    Trilla, Cristina
    Mora, Josefina
    Ginjaume, Nuria
    Nan, Madalina Nicoleta
    Alejos, Obdulia
    Dominguez, Carla
    Vega, Carmen
    Godinez, Yessenia
    Cruz-Lemini, Monica
    Parra, Juan
    Llurba, Elisa
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2022, 12 (08)
  • [22] Clinical effectiveness of routine first trimester combined screening for pre-eclampsia with placental growth factor
    Mendoza, M.
    Bonacina, E.
    Garcia-Manau, P.
    Armengol, M.
    Del Barco, E.
    Carreras, E.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 62 : 208 - 209
  • [23] Clinical first-trimester routine screening for Down syndrome in singleton pregnancies in northern Finland
    Valinen, Yrtti
    Rapakko, Katrin
    Kokkonen, Hannaleena
    Laitinen, Paivi
    Tekay, Aydin
    Ahola, Tarja
    Ryynanen, Markku
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2007, 196 (03) : 278 - 279
  • [24] Noninvasive prenatal testing in routine clinical practice - An audit of NIPT and combined first-trimester screening in an unselected Australian population
    McLennan, Andrew
    Palma-Dias, Ricardo
    Costa, Fabricio Da Silva
    Meagher, Simon
    Nisbet, Debbie L.
    Scott, Fergus
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2016, 56 (01): : 22 - 28
  • [25] Prospective Validation of First-Trimester Screening for Preterm Preeclampsia in Nulliparous Women (PREDICTION Study)
    Guerby, Paul
    Audibert, Francois
    Johnson, Jo-Ann
    Okun, Nanette
    Giguere, Yves
    Forest, Jean-Claude
    Chaillet, Nils
    Masse, Benoit
    Wright, David
    Ghesquiere, Louise
    Bujold, Emmanuel
    HYPERTENSION, 2024, 81 (07) : 1574 - 1582
  • [26] False-Negative Results in Routine Combined First-Trimester Screening for Down Syndrome in Finland
    Marttala, Jaana
    Kaijomaa, Marja
    Ranta, Jenni
    Dahlbacka, Anna
    Nieminen, Pentti
    Tekay, Aydin
    Kokkonen, Hannaleena
    Laitinen, Paivi
    Ignatius, Jaakko
    Romppanen, Jarkko
    Heinonen, Seppo
    Jarvela, Ilkka
    Heikkila, Matti
    Yla-Outinen, Ari
    Ulander, Veli-Matti
    Hamalainen, Esa
    Ryynanen, Markku
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2012, 29 (03) : 211 - 216
  • [27] Screening for Open Spina Bifida in a Routine Clinical Setting at the First-Trimester Scan: A Prospective Multicentre Cohort Study
    Tiechl, Johanna
    Azim, Samira Abdel
    Leitner, Katharina
    Berger, Astrid
    Mutz-Dehbalaie, Irene
    Goebel, Georg
    Scheier, Matthias
    FETAL DIAGNOSIS AND THERAPY, 2021, 48 (02) : 96 - 102
  • [28] Fetal echocardiography during routine first-trimester screening: a feasibility study in an unselected population
    Vimpelli, Tommi
    Huhtala, Heini
    Acharya, Ganesh
    PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2006, 26 (05) : 475 - 482
  • [29] Performance of the FMF First-Trimester Preeclampsia-Screening Algorithm in a High-Risk Population in The Netherlands
    Zwertbroek, Eva F.
    Groen, Henk
    Fontanella, Federica
    Maggio, Luana
    Marchi, Laura
    Bilardo, Caterina M.
    FETAL DIAGNOSIS AND THERAPY, 2021, 48 (02) : 103 - 111
  • [30] Clinical implementation of routine screening for fetal trisomies in the UK NHS: cell-free DNA test contingent on results from first-trimester combined test
    Gil, M. M.
    Revello, R.
    Poon, L. C.
    Akolekar, R.
    Nicolaides, K. H.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 47 (01) : 45 - 52