Carbon Mitigation and Economics for Energy Conversion When CO2 is Stored via Enhanced Oil Recovery

被引:3
|
作者
Williams, Robert H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Princeton Univ, Princeton Environm Inst, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
来源
GHGT-11 | 2013年 / 37卷
关键词
CCS; EOR; coproduction; coal; biomass; synthetic fuels; economics;
D O I
10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.619
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The carbon mitigation benefits and economics are described for alternative coal energy conversion options for which CO2 is captured and sold for enhanced oil recovery (EOR). Both the CO2 capture cost and internal rate of return on equity (IRRE) are considered as economic metrics. Post-combustion, oxycombustion, and pre-combustion capture options are considered for power generation, and pre-combustion capture options are also considered for making synthetic gasoline and for coproducing gasoline and electricity. In addition, coprocessing some biomass with coal is considered for plants coproducing gasoline and electricity. Findings for prospective crude oil prices are that: (i) the most profitable options using only coal are systems providing synthetic gasoline; (ii) systems coproducing electricity + gasoline are more profitable than any systems providing only electricity; (iii) options coprocessing some biomass will become the most profitable options at high GHG emission prices, and (iv) gasoline and coproduction plants, even sited remotely from CO2 EOR market opportunities, are likely to be competitive in EOR markets if an adequate CO2 pipeline infrastructure were in place; (v) coal/biomass systems coproducing gasoline + electricity are likely to be more profitable coal/biomass systems making gasoline for crude oil prices less than $75/barrel.
引用
收藏
页码:6867 / 6876
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Mechanism of CO2 enhanced oil recovery in shale reservoirs
    Li, Hai-Bo
    Yang, Zheng-Ming
    Li, Rui-Shan
    Zhou, Ti-Yao
    Guo, He-Kun
    Liu, Xue-Wei
    Dai, Yi-Xin
    Hu, Zhen-Guo
    Meng, Huan
    PETROLEUM SCIENCE, 2021, 18 (06) : 1788 - 1796
  • [32] Experimental study of enhanced oil recovery with CO2 slug
    Du, Baojian
    Cheng, Linsong
    GEOSYSTEM ENGINEERING, 2014, 17 (05) : 279 - 286
  • [33] A systematic review of CO2 injection for enhanced oil recovery and carbon storage in shale reservoirs
    Wang, Lu
    Zhang, Yifan
    Zou, Rui
    Zou, Run
    Huang, Liang
    Liu, Yisheng
    Meng, Zhan
    Wang, Zhilin
    Lei, Hao
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2023, 48 (95) : 37134 - 37165
  • [34] Heat-Resistant CO2 Foam for Promoting Carbon Capture and Enhanced Oil Recovery
    Liu, Yali
    Zhang, Chao
    Wen, Quan
    Li, Zhaomin
    Song, Mingzhe
    FRONTIERS IN ENERGY RESEARCH, 2022, 10
  • [35] LOOKING AT CO2 RECOVERY IN ENHANCED-OIL-RECOVERY PROJECTS.
    Price, Brian C.
    Oil and Gas Journal, 1984, 82 (52): : 48 - 53
  • [36] Compositional Modeling of Impure CO2 Injection for Enhanced Oil Recovery and CO2 Storage
    Lee, Hye-Seung
    Cho, Jinhyung
    Lee, Young-Woo
    Lee, Kun-Sang
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2021, 11 (17):
  • [37] CO2 mobility control using CO2 philic surfactant for enhanced oil recovery
    Sagir M.
    Tan I.M.
    Mushtaq M.
    Pervaiz M.
    Tahir M.S.
    Shahzad K.
    Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology, 2016, 6 (3) : 401 - 407
  • [38] CO2 storage potential during CO2 enhanced oil recovery in sandstone reservoirs
    Rezk, Mohamed Gamal
    Foroozesh, Jalal
    Zivar, Davood
    Mumtaz, Mudassar
    JOURNAL OF NATURAL GAS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2019, 66 (233-243) : 233 - 243
  • [39] On the CO2 storage potential of cyclic CO2 injection process for enhanced oil recovery
    Abedini, Ali
    Torabi, Farshid
    FUEL, 2014, 124 : 14 - 27
  • [40] CO2 Accounting and Risk Analysis for CO2 Sequestration at Enhanced Oil Recovery Sites
    Dai, Zhenxue
    Viswanathan, Hari
    Middleton, Richard
    Pan, Feng
    Ampomah, William
    Yang, Changbing
    Jia, Wei
    Xiao, Ting
    Lee, Si-Yong
    McPherson, Brian
    Balch, Robert
    Grigg, Reid
    White, Mark
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 50 (14) : 7546 - 7554