Femoral fixation of hamstring grafts in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Biomechanical evaluation of different fixation techniques - Is there an acutle angle effect?

被引:9
|
作者
Niedzwietzki, Patricia [1 ]
Zantop, Thore [1 ]
Weimann, Andre [1 ]
Herbort, Mirco [1 ]
Raschke, Michael J. [1 ]
Petersen, Wolf [1 ]
机构
[1] Wilhelm Univ Muenster, Dept Trauma Hand & Reconsturct surg, D-48149 Munster, Germany
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE | 2007年 / 35卷 / 05期
关键词
hamstring graft fixation; biomechanics; maximal load; tensile stress; failure mode; cyclic testing;
D O I
10.1177/0363546506297906
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The literature provides little biomechanical data about femoral fixation of hamstring grafts in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Hypothesis: A hybrid fixation technique with use of an undersized screw has sufficient strength to provide secure fixation of posterior cruciate ligament grafts. Additional aperture fixation with a biodegradable interference screw can prevent graft damage that might be caused by an acute angle on the edge of the femoral tunnel. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: In part 1, extracortical fixation of posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions with quadrupled porcine flexor digitorum grafts to simulate human hamstring grafts was compared with hybrid fixation methods using 6-, 7-, and 8-mm screws. Groups were tested in cycling loading with the load applied in line with the bone tunnel. In part 2, extracortical fixation was compared with hybrid fixation using a 1-mm undersized screw anterior and posterior to the graft. Structural properties and graft abrasion were evaluated after cyclic loading with the load applied at 901 to the tunnel. In each group, 8 porcine knees were tested. Results: In part 1, stiffness, maximum load, and yield load were significantly higher for hybrid fixation than for extracortical fixation. Hybrid fixation with an 8-mm screw resulted in higher yield load than with a 7-mm screw. In part 2, graft laceration was more pronounced in specimens with extracortical fixation than with hybrid fixation. Posterior screw placement was superior to the anterior position. Conclusion: For all parameters, hybrid fixation with an interference screw provided superior structural results. No relevant disadvantages of undersized screws could be found. Graft damage due to abrasion at the edge of the femoral bone tunnel was reduced by use of an interference screw. The posterior screw placement seems favorable. Clinical Relevance: Hybrid fixation of hamstring grafts in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is superior to extracortical fixation alone with no relevant disadvantages of undersized screws. The results raise the suspicion of an acute angle effect of the femoral bone tunnel.
引用
收藏
页码:780 / 786
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Hybrid hamstring graft tibial fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Miroslav Z. Milankov
    Natasa Miljkovic
    Natasa Janjic
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2010, 130 : 1033 - 1036
  • [42] Hybrid hamstring graft tibial fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Milankov, Miroslav Z.
    Miljkovic, Natasa
    Janjic, Natasa
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2010, 130 (08) : 1033 - 1036
  • [43] What Is the Best Femoral Fixation of Hamstring Autografts in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction?: A Meta-analysis
    Colvin, Alexis
    Sharma, Charu
    Parides, Michael
    Glashow, Jonathan
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2011, 469 (04) : 1075 - 1081
  • [44] Cross-pin femoral fixation: A new technique for hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction of the knee
    Clark, R
    Olsen, RE
    Larson, BJ
    Goble, EM
    Farrer, RP
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 1998, 14 (03): : 258 - 267
  • [45] Femoral Fixation With Curve Cross-Pin System in Arthroscopic Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Adriani, Ezio
    Di Paola, Berardino
    Alfieri, Andrea
    De Fenu, Edoardo
    ARTHROSCOPY TECHNIQUES, 2018, 7 (04): : E289 - E298
  • [46] Biomechanical properties of patellar and hamstring graft tibial fixation techniques in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction - Experimental study with roentgen stereometric analysis
    Adam, F
    Pape, D
    Schiel, K
    Steimer, O
    Kohn, D
    Rupp, S
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2004, 32 (01): : 71 - 78
  • [47] Biomechanics of initial tibial fixation in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Margheritini, F
    Rihn, JA
    Mauro, CS
    Stabile, KJ
    Woo, SLY
    Harner, CD
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2005, 21 (10): : 1164 - 1171
  • [48] Posterior Cruciate Ligament Graft Fixation Angles, Part 2 Biomechanical Evaluation for Anatomic Double-Bundle Reconstruction
    Kennedy, Nicholas I.
    LaPrade, Robert F.
    Goldsmith, Mary T.
    Faucett, Scott C.
    Rasmussen, Matthew T.
    Coatney, Garrett A.
    Engebretsen, Lars
    Wijdicks, Coen A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2014, 42 (10): : 2346 - 2355
  • [49] Posterior Cruciate Ligament Graft Fixation Angles, Part 1 Biomechanical Evaluation for Anatomic Single-Bundle Reconstruction
    Kennedy, Nicholas I.
    LaPrade, Robert F.
    Goldsmith, Mary T.
    Faucett, Scott C.
    Rasmussen, Matthew T.
    Coatney, Garrett A.
    Engebretsen, Lars
    Wijdicks, Coen A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2014, 42 (10): : 2338 - 2345
  • [50] Fixation strength of three different graft types used in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Chih-Hwa Chen
    Shih-Wei Chou
    Wen-Jer Chen
    Chun-Hsiung Shih
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2004, 12 : 371 - 375