Timing of coronary artery bypass grafting after acute myocardial infarction may not influence mortality and readmissions

被引:23
|
作者
Bianco, Valentino [1 ]
Kilic, Arman [1 ,2 ]
Gleason, Thomas G. [1 ,2 ]
Aranda-Michel, Edgar [1 ]
Wang, Yisi [2 ]
Navid, Forozan [1 ,2 ]
Sultan, Ibrahim [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, Div Cardiac Surg, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Med Ctr, Heart & Vasc Inst, Pittsburgh, PA USA
来源
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY | 2021年 / 161卷 / 06期
关键词
acute myocardial infarction; coronary artery bypass grafting; non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction; ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction; SURGICAL REVASCULARIZATION; SURGERY; INTERVENTION; OUTCOMES; REGISTRY; DEATH; MODEL; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.11.061
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: Coronary artery bypass grafting is often delayed after acute myocardial infarction to avoid an increase in postoperative morbidity and mortality. We hypothesized that the timing of coronary artery bypass grafting after acute myocardial infarction may not be consistently associated with postoperative outcomes. Methods: All patients who underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center from 2011 to 2017 after an acute myocardial infarction were reviewed. A comparative analysis for time from myocardial infarction presentation to coronary artery bypass grafting was performed with primary outcomes including all-cause mortality and readmission. Results: A total of 7048 patients underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting. Of these, 2058 patients had acute myocardial infarction with all relevant variables available for analysis. The study population was divided into 2 coronary artery bypass grafting timing cohorts, including less than 24 hours (n = 292) and 24 hours or more (n = 1766). Previous percutaneous coronary intervention, cardiogenic shock, and intra-aortic balloon pump were more prevalent in the less than 24 hours group. Operative mortality was significantly higher in the less than 24 hours cohort (7.19% vs 3.79%; P = .01). Diabetes mellitus, peripheral vascular disease, serum creatinine, age, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and immunosuppression were significant predictors (P < .05) of mortality. After risk adjustment with propensity scoring, there was no difference between time cohorts for operative mortality (4.15% vs 4.58%; P = .62). New-onset atrial fibrillation occurred more frequently in the 24 hours or more cohort. There was no difference between groups for the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular event readmissions. Conclusions: After adjusting for baseline patient characteristics, there was no statistically significant difference between timing cohorts for mortality or major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular event readmissions.
引用
收藏
页码:2056 / +
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Is the timing of coronary artery bypass graft surgery following acute myocardial infarction associated with a difference in mortality?
    Mack, M
    Katz, M
    Kugelmass, A
    Zocco, JJ
    Wolfgang, T
    Christopher, T
    Becker, E
    Culler, S
    Simon, A
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2004, 43 (05) : 291A - 291A
  • [32] Frequency and prognosis of emergency coronary artery bypass grafting after percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction
    Moscucci, M
    O'Donnell, M
    Share, D
    Maxwell-Eward, A
    Kline-Rogers, E
    De Franco, AC
    Meengs, WL
    Clark, VL
    McGinnity, JG
    De Gregorio, M
    Patel, K
    Eagle, KA
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2003, 92 (08): : 967 - 969
  • [33] Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock
    Grothusen, Christina
    Friedrich, Christine
    Ulbricht, Ulysses
    Meinert, Jette
    Attmann, Tim
    Huenges, Katharina
    Borzikowsky, Christoph
    Haneya, Assad
    Schoettler, Jan
    Cremer, Jochen
    REVIEWS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2022, 23 (07)
  • [34] Impella-assisted coronary artery bypass grafting for acute myocardial infarction
    Takahashi, Kenichiro
    Nakata, Jun
    Kurita, Jiro
    Ishii, Yosuke
    Shimizu, Wataru
    Nitta, Takashi
    ASIAN CARDIOVASCULAR & THORACIC ANNALS, 2020, 28 (02): : 115 - 117
  • [35] Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting for acute myocardial infarction
    Takai, Hideaki
    Kobayashi, Junjiro
    Tagusari, Osamu
    Bando, Ko
    Niwaya, Kazuo
    Nakajima, Hiroyuki
    Yagihara, Toshikatsu
    Kitamura, Soichiro
    CIRCULATION JOURNAL, 2006, 70 (10) : 1303 - 1306
  • [36] Commentary: Timing of coronary artery bypass grafting after ST elevation myocardial infarction: All judgment, no magic
    Akhrass, Rami
    Khatri, Jaikirshan
    Bakaeen, Faisal G.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2023, 165 (02): : 684 - 685
  • [37] Early readmissions after isolated coronary artery bypass grafting
    Narain, Aditya
    Kwok, Chun Shing
    Lea, Adam
    Ridley, Paul
    Warwick, Richard
    Manorekang, Ronald
    Goel, Nikita
    Wang, Chun Wai
    Shufflebotham, Adrian
    Balacumaraswami, Lognathen
    Mamas, Mamas A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2019, 73 (04)
  • [38] SIGNIFICANCE OF MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION AFTER CORONARY-ARTERY BYPASS GRAFTING
    MERRILL, A
    HINNAN, M
    THOMAS, C
    SCHECHTER, E
    CIRCULATION, 1975, 52 (04) : 217 - 217
  • [39] Troponin levels in patients with myocardial infarction after coronary artery bypass grafting
    Carrier, M
    Pellerin, M
    Perrault, LP
    Solymoss, BC
    Pelletier, LC
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2000, 69 (02): : 435 - 440
  • [40] Revisiting the definition of perioperative myocardial infarction after coronary artery bypass grafting
    Thygesen, Kristian
    Jaffe, Allan S.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2022, 43 (25) : 2418 - 2420