Distinct Patterns of Gene-Specific Methylation in Mammalian Placentas: Implications for Placental Evolution and Function

被引:22
|
作者
Ng, H. K. [1 ]
Novakovic, B. [1 ,2 ]
Hiendleder, S. [3 ,4 ]
Craig, J. M. [1 ,2 ]
Roberts, C. T. [3 ]
Saffery, R. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Royal Childrens Hosp, Murdoch Childrens Res Inst, Parkville, Vic 3052, Australia
[2] Univ Melbourne, Dept Paediat, Parkville, Vic 3052, Australia
[3] Anim Sci Univ Adelaide, JS Davies Epigenet & Genet Grp, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
[4] Univ Adelaide, Robinson Inst, Sch Paediat & Reprod Hlth, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
DNA methylation; Epigenetics; Wnt signalling; DNMT1; Vitamin D 24-hydroxylase; DNA METHYLATION; 5-METHYLCYTOSINE CONTENT; EPIGENETIC REGULATION; IMPRINTED GENES; EXPRESSION; HYPERMETHYLATION; UNDERMETHYLATION; DIFFERENTIATION; PHENOTYPE; SEQUENCES;
D O I
10.1016/j.placenta.2010.01.009
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The placenta has arisen relatively recently and is among the most rapidly evolving tissues in mammals. Several different placental barrier and structure types appear to have independently evolved common functional features. Specific patterns of gene expression that determine placental development in humans are predicted to be accompanied by specific profiles of epigenetic modification. However, the stratification of epigenetic modifications into those involved in conserved aspects of placental function, versus those involved in divergent placental features, has yet to begin. As a first step towards this goal, we have investigated the methylation status of a small number of gene-specific methylation events recently identified in human placenta, in a panel of placental tissue from baboon, marmoset, cow, cat, guinea pig and mouse. These represent disparate placental barrier types and structures. In this study we hypothesized that specific epigenetic markings may be associated with placental barrier type or function, independent of phylogeny. However, in contrast to our predictions, the majority of gene-specific methylation appears to track with phylogeny, independent of placental barrier type or other structural features. This suggests that despite the likelihood of epigenetic modification playing a role in the functioning and evolution of different placental subtypes, there is no evidence for an involvement of the gene-specific methylation profiles we have identified, in specifying these differences. Further studies, examining larger numbers of epigenetic modifications across phylogeny, are required to define the role of specific epigenetic modifications in the evolution of distinct placental structures. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:259 / 268
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Correlation of Global and Gene-Specific DNA Methylation in Maternal-Infant Pairs
    Kile, Molly L.
    Baccarelli, Andrea
    Tarantini, Letizia
    Hoffman, Elaine
    Wright, Robert O.
    Christiani, David C.
    PLOS ONE, 2010, 5 (10):
  • [42] Correlation between methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene-specific methylation and recurrent spontaneous abortion
    Zhu, Peng-Fei
    Song, Zhi-Jiao
    Bi, Xing-Yu
    Su, Dan
    Li, Xiao-Ling
    Chen, Yan-Hua
    Wu, Xue-Qing
    BIOTECHNOLOGY AND GENETIC ENGINEERING REVIEWS, 2023, 39 (02) : 871 - 881
  • [43] DNMT1-interacting RNAs block gene-specific DNA methylation
    Annalisa Di Ruscio
    Alexander K. Ebralidze
    Touati Benoukraf
    Giovanni Amabile
    Loyal A. Goff
    Jolyon Terragni
    Maria Eugenia Figueroa
    Lorena Lobo De Figueiredo Pontes
    Meritxell Alberich-Jorda
    Pu Zhang
    Mengchu Wu
    Francesco D’Alò
    Ari Melnick
    Giuseppe Leone
    Konstantin K. Ebralidze
    Sriharsa Pradhan
    John L. Rinn
    Daniel G. Tenen
    Nature, 2013, 503 : 371 - 376
  • [44] Reproductive characteristics are associated with gene-specific promoter methylation status in breast cancer
    Lauren E. McCullough
    Lindsay J. Collin
    Kathleen Conway
    Alexandra J. White
    Yoon Hee Cho
    Sumitra Shantakumar
    Mary Beth Terry
    Susan L. Teitelbaum
    Alfred I. Neugut
    Regina M. Santella
    Jia Chen
    Marilie D. Gammon
    BMC Cancer, 19
  • [45] DEVELOPMENTAL PATTERN OF GENE-SPECIFIC DNA METHYLATION IN THE MOUSE EMBRYO AND GERM LINE
    KAFRI, T
    ARIEL, M
    BRANDEIS, M
    SHEMER, R
    URVEN, L
    MCCARREY, J
    CEDAR, H
    RAZIN, A
    GENES & DEVELOPMENT, 1992, 6 (05) : 705 - 714
  • [46] Quantitative global and gene-specific promoter methylation in relation to biological properties of neuroblastomas
    Kiss, Nimrod B.
    Kogner, Per
    Johnsen, John Inge
    Martinsson, Tommy
    Larsson, Catharina
    Geli, Janos
    BMC MEDICAL GENETICS, 2012, 13
  • [47] Prenatal Tobacco Smoke Exposure Affects Global and Gene-specific DNA Methylation
    Breton, Carrie V.
    Byun, Hyang-Min
    Wenten, Made
    Pan, Fei
    Yang, Allen
    Gilliland, Frank D.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2009, 180 (05) : 462 - 467
  • [48] DNMT1-interacting RNAs block gene-specific DNA methylation
    Di Ruscio, Annalisa
    Ebralidze, Alexander K.
    Benoukraf, Touati
    Amabile, Giovanni
    Goff, Loyal A.
    Terragni, Jolyon
    Figueroa, Maria Eugenia
    Pontes, Lorena Lobo De Figueiredo
    Alberich-Jorda, Meritxell
    Zhang, Pu
    Wu, Mengchu
    D'Alo, Francesco
    Melnick, Ari
    Leone, Giuseppe
    Ebralidze, Konstantin K.
    Pradhan, Sriharsa
    Rinn, John L.
    Tenen, Daniel G.
    NATURE, 2013, 503 (7476) : 371 - +
  • [49] Reproductive characteristics are associated with gene-specific promoter methylation status in breast cancern
    McCullough, Lauren E.
    Collin, Lindsay J.
    Conway, Kathleen
    White, Alexandra J.
    Cho, Yoon Hee
    Shantakumar, Sumitra
    Terry, Mary Beth
    Teitelbaum, Susan L.
    Neugut, Alfred, I
    Santella, Regina M.
    Chen, Jia
    Gammon, Marilie D.
    BMC CANCER, 2019, 19 (01)
  • [50] Inbreeding effects on gene-specific DNA methylation among tissues of Chinook salmon
    Venney, Clare J.
    Johansson, Mattias L.
    Heath, Daniel D.
    MOLECULAR ECOLOGY, 2016, 25 (18) : 4521 - 4533