Comparison between Monte Carlo and analytical calculation of Clausing functions of cylindrical and conical tubes

被引:10
|
作者
Lobo, PJ
Becheri, F
Gómez-Goñi, J
机构
[1] Univ Politecn Madrid, Dept Fis Aplicada Tecnol Informat, EUIT Telecomun, E-28031 Madrid, Spain
[2] Univ Politecn Madrid, Dpto Sistemas Elect & Control, EUIT Telecomun, E-28031 Madrid, Spain
关键词
Monte Carlo; computer simulation; transmission probability; conductance calculation;
D O I
10.1016/j.vacuum.2004.05.013
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
In a previous work (J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 21 (2003) 1452), we calculated the transmission probabilities for cylindrical and conical ducts, solving numerically the Clausing integral equation and integrating the resulting Clausing function. It is also important to obtain the Clausing function itself, because it is proportional to the distribution of molecular collisions with the walls of the system, as we show in this contribution. Besides, the density profile of the gas inside the duct can be calculated using the Clausing function, as shown by Davies and Lucas (J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 16 (1983) 1). We have calculated the Clausing functions for different cylindrical and conical ducts using a Monte Carlo simulation method and we have compared these results to the numerical ones, finding a very good agreement, within statistical uncertainties. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:83 / 88
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison between Monte Carlo and analytical calculation of the conductance of cylindrical and conical tubes
    Gómez-Goñi, J
    Lobo, PJ
    JOURNAL OF VACUUM SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY A, 2003, 21 (04): : 1452 - 1457
  • [2] Calculation of energy response of cylindrical G-M tubes with EGS4 Monte Carlo code
    Liu, BX
    Wang, YC
    Xie, B
    Zhang, H
    PROCEEDINGS OF CHEP 2001, 2001, : 354 - 356
  • [3] Comparison of analytical theory with Monte Carlo simulations
    Jansen, G.H.
    Advances in Imaging and Electron Physics, 2024, 230 : 437 - 454
  • [4] COMPARISON OF MONTE-CARLO SIMULATIONS AND ANALYTICAL MODELS FOR THE CALCULATION OF IMPLANTATION PROFILES IN MULTILAYER TARGETS
    RYSSEL, H
    KRUGER, W
    LORENZ, J
    NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION B-BEAM INTERACTIONS WITH MATERIALS AND ATOMS, 1987, 19-20 : 40 - 44
  • [5] Monte Carlo calculation of neck charging in cathode-ray tubes
    Hendriks, BHW
    van Gorkom, GGP
    Lambert, N
    de Zwart, ST
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRON DEVICES, 1998, 45 (08) : 1836 - 1842
  • [6] Monte Carlo comparison of quasielectron wave functions
    Melik-Alaverdian, V
    Bonesteel, NE
    PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 1998, 58 (03): : 1451 - 1456
  • [7] CALCULATION OF THE CAPACITY OF VERTICAL CYLINDRICAL TANKS BY THE MONTE CARLO METHOD.
    Gornshtein, B.Ya.
    Kondratenko, M.I.
    Eskin, S.P.
    Measurement Techniques, 1986, 29 (02) : 119 - 124
  • [8] CALCULATION OF THE CAPACITY OF VERTICAL CYLINDRICAL TANKS BY THE MONTE-CARLO METHOD
    GORNSHTEIN, BY
    KONDRATENKO, MI
    ESKIN, SP
    MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES USSR, 1986, 29 (02): : 119 - 124
  • [9] A comparison of Monte Carlo dose calculation denoising techniques
    El Naqa, I
    Kawrakow, I
    Fippel, M
    Siebers, JV
    Lindsay, PE
    Wickerhauser, MV
    Vicic, M
    Zakarian, K
    Kauffmann, N
    Deasy, JO
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2005, 50 (05): : 909 - 922
  • [10] COMPARISON OF MONTE-CARLO AND ANALYTICAL CALCULATIONS IN QCD
    INGELMAN, G
    SOPER, DE
    PHYSICS LETTERS B, 1984, 148 (1-3) : 171 - 176