A framework for Software Quality Evaluation

被引:0
|
作者
Wong, B
Jeffery, R
机构
[1] Univ Technol Sydney, Fac Informat Technol, Broadway, NSW 2007, Australia
[2] Univ New S Wales, Sch Comp Sci & Engn, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The primary objective of this paper was to propose and empirically test a theoretical model for Software Quality Evaluation based on Gutman's Means-End Chain Model. Recent studies of Gutman's Model have found it significant for software quality evaluation. As such the proposed framework introduces the first theoretical model for software quality evaluation, which considers the motivation behind the quality evaluation, and the utilization of cognitive structures to describe these relationships. The framework not only gives the rationale for the choice of characteristics used in software quality evaluation, but also introduces the possibility that the characteristics can be used to measure the capability for attaining desired consequences and sought after values. To test this proposed framework, a study of 22 commercial Australian companies was conducted and analyzed with Path Analysis. Results of the analysis provided a number of important insights and suggest several conclusions. The study showed (1) that there is support for applying Gutman's Means-end chain model as the theoretical foundation for a framework on software quality evaluation; (2) that characteristics can be used as a measure to predict the capability of the software on desired consequences and values; (3) that non-ISO9126 characteristics are also important for software evaluation; (4) that the characteristic, consequence, value relationship can be valuable to benefit the Goal Question Metric model.
引用
收藏
页码:103 / 118
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation Framework for Quality Management Software
    Hrgarek, Nadica
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFORMATION AND ORGANIZATIONAL SCIENCES, 2008, 32 (01) : 33 - 50
  • [2] Performance Evaluation Framework for Software Quality Engineering
    Lee, Joon-Sang
    Jeong, Oksoon
    Ryu, Jewhi
    [J]. 2009 NINTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON QUALITY SOFTWARE (QSIC 2009), 2009, : 438 - 443
  • [3] A RBF classifier based framework for software quality evaluation
    Shin, M
    Goel, AL
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE FOR MODELLING, CONTROL & AUTOMATION - INTELLIGENT IMAGE PROCESSING, DATA ANALYSIS & INFORMATION RETRIEVAL, 1999, 56 : 176 - 182
  • [4] A Framework for Classifying and Comparing Software Architecture Tools for Quality Evaluation
    Anjos, Eudisley
    Zenha-Rela, Mario
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE AND ITS APPLICATIONS - ICCSA 2011, PT V, 2011, 6786 : 270 - 282
  • [5] SQME: a framework for modeling and evaluation of software architecture quality attributes
    Ali Sedaghatbaf
    Mohammad Abdollahi Azgomi
    [J]. Software & Systems Modeling, 2019, 18 : 2609 - 2632
  • [6] SQME: a framework for modeling and evaluation of software architecture quality attributes
    Sedaghatbaf, Ali
    Azgomi, Mohammad Abdollahi
    [J]. SOFTWARE AND SYSTEMS MODELING, 2019, 18 (04): : 2609 - 2632
  • [7] WSQF: Comprehensive Software Quality Evaluation Framework and Benchmark Based on SQuaRE
    Tsuda, Naohiko
    Washizaki, Hironori
    Honda, Kiyoshi
    Nakai, Hidenori
    Fukazawa, Yoshiaki
    Azuma, Motoei
    Komiyama, Toshihiro
    Nakano, Tadashi
    Suzuki, Hirotsugu
    Morita, Sumie
    Kojima, Katsue
    Hando, Akiyoshi
    [J]. 2019 IEEE/ACM 41ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING: SOFTWARE ENGINEERING IN PRACTICE (ICSE-SEIP 2019), 2019, : 312 - 321
  • [8] A FRAMEWORK FOR SOFTWARE QUALITY MEASUREMENT
    STOCKMAN, SG
    TODD, AR
    ROBINSON, GA
    [J]. IEEE JOURNAL ON SELECTED AREAS IN COMMUNICATIONS, 1990, 8 (02) : 224 - 233
  • [9] Software system evaluation framework
    Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal, Montreal, Canada
    [J]. Computer, 12 (17-26):
  • [10] Evaluation framework for simulation software
    Brunel University, Dept. of Info. Systems and Computing, Uxbridge, United Kingdom
    不详
    [J]. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 5 (366-382):