Analysis of Wearable and Smartphone-Based Technologies for the Measurement of Barbell Velocity in Different Resistance Training Exercises

被引:84
|
作者
Balsalobre-Fernandez, Carlos [1 ,2 ]
Marchante, David [2 ]
Baz-Valle, Eneko [2 ]
Alonso-Molero, Ivan [2 ]
Jimenez, Sergio L. [1 ]
Munoz-Lopez, Mario [2 ]
机构
[1] European Univ Madrid, Sch Sports Sci, Madrid, Spain
[2] PowerExplos Ctr, Dept Res & Dev, Madrid, Spain
来源
FRONTIERS IN PHYSIOLOGY | 2017年 / 8卷
关键词
monitoring; biomechanics; technology; strength; validation; MOVEMENT VELOCITY; PREDICTION; STRENGTH; POWER; LOAD; RELIABILITY; PERFORMANCE; ADAPTATIONS; INTENSITY; VALIDITY;
D O I
10.3389/fphys.2017.00649
中图分类号
Q4 [生理学];
学科分类号
071003 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to analyze the validity, reliability, and accuracy of new wearable and smartphone-based technology for the measurement of barbell velocity in resistance training exercises. To do this, 10 highly trained powerlifters (age = 26.1 +/- 3.9 years) performed 11 repetitions with loads ranging 50-100% of the 1-Repetition maximum in the bench-press, full-squat, and hip-thrust exercises while barbell velocity was simultaneously measured using a linear transducer (LT), two Beast wearable devices (one placed on the subjects' wrist -BW-, and the other one directly attached to the barbell -BB-) and the iOS PowerLift app. Results showed a high correlation between the LT and BW (r = 0.94-0.98, SEE = 0.04-0.07 m.s(-1)), BB (r = 0.97-0.98, SEE = 0.04-0.05 m.s(-1)), and the PowerLift app (r = 0.97-0.98, SEE = 0.03-0.05 m.s(-1)) for the measurement of barbell velocity in the three exercises. Paired samples T-test revealed systematic biases between the LT and BW, BB and the app in the hip-thrust, between the LT and BW in the full-squat and between the LT and BB in the bench-press exercise (p < 0.001). Moreover, the analysis of the linear regression on the Bland-Altman plots showed that the differences between the LT and BW (R-2 = 0.004-0.03), BB (R-2 = 0.007-0.01), and the app (R-2 = 0.001-0.03) were similar across the whole range of velocities analyzed. Finally, the reliability of the BW (ICC = 0.910-0.988), BB (ICC = 0.922-0.990), and the app (ICC = 0.928-0.989) for the measurement of the two repetitions performed with each load were almost the same than that observed with the LT (ICC = 0.937-0.990). Both the Beast wearable device and the PowerLift app were highly valid, reliable, and accurate for the measurement of barbell velocity in the bench-press, full-squat, and hip-thrust exercises. These results could have potential practical applications for strength and conditioning coaches who wish to measure barbell velocity during resistance training.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [21] Design and data analysis of a wearable basketball training posture measurement system based on multifunctional conjugated polymer composite materials
    Hu, Yunzhang
    Huang, He
    [J]. MCB Molecular and Cellular Biomechanics, 2024, 21 (03):
  • [22] Smartphone-based reminder system to promote pelvic floor muscle training for the management of postnatal urinary incontinence: historical control study with propensity score-matched analysis
    Kinouchi, Kaori
    Ohashi, Kazutomo
    [J]. PEERJ, 2018, 6
  • [23] Applications of smartphone-based near-infrared (NIR) imaging, measurement, and spectroscopy technologies to point-of-care (POC) diagnostics基于智能手机的近红外成像、测量和光谱技术在护理点诊断中的应用
    Wenjing Huang
    Shenglin Luo
    Dong Yang
    Sheng Zhang
    [J]. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE B, 2021, 22 : 171 - 189
  • [24] Comparison of the effects of velocity-based vs. traditional resistance training methods on adaptations in strength, power, and sprint speed: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and quality of evidence appraisal
    Orange, Samuel T.
    Hritz, Adam
    Pearson, Liam
    Jeffries, Owen
    Jones, Thomas W.
    Steele, James
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPORTS SCIENCES, 2022, 40 (11) : 1220 - 1234