Analysis of Wearable and Smartphone-Based Technologies for the Measurement of Barbell Velocity in Different Resistance Training Exercises

被引:84
|
作者
Balsalobre-Fernandez, Carlos [1 ,2 ]
Marchante, David [2 ]
Baz-Valle, Eneko [2 ]
Alonso-Molero, Ivan [2 ]
Jimenez, Sergio L. [1 ]
Munoz-Lopez, Mario [2 ]
机构
[1] European Univ Madrid, Sch Sports Sci, Madrid, Spain
[2] PowerExplos Ctr, Dept Res & Dev, Madrid, Spain
来源
FRONTIERS IN PHYSIOLOGY | 2017年 / 8卷
关键词
monitoring; biomechanics; technology; strength; validation; MOVEMENT VELOCITY; PREDICTION; STRENGTH; POWER; LOAD; RELIABILITY; PERFORMANCE; ADAPTATIONS; INTENSITY; VALIDITY;
D O I
10.3389/fphys.2017.00649
中图分类号
Q4 [生理学];
学科分类号
071003 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to analyze the validity, reliability, and accuracy of new wearable and smartphone-based technology for the measurement of barbell velocity in resistance training exercises. To do this, 10 highly trained powerlifters (age = 26.1 +/- 3.9 years) performed 11 repetitions with loads ranging 50-100% of the 1-Repetition maximum in the bench-press, full-squat, and hip-thrust exercises while barbell velocity was simultaneously measured using a linear transducer (LT), two Beast wearable devices (one placed on the subjects' wrist -BW-, and the other one directly attached to the barbell -BB-) and the iOS PowerLift app. Results showed a high correlation between the LT and BW (r = 0.94-0.98, SEE = 0.04-0.07 m.s(-1)), BB (r = 0.97-0.98, SEE = 0.04-0.05 m.s(-1)), and the PowerLift app (r = 0.97-0.98, SEE = 0.03-0.05 m.s(-1)) for the measurement of barbell velocity in the three exercises. Paired samples T-test revealed systematic biases between the LT and BW, BB and the app in the hip-thrust, between the LT and BW in the full-squat and between the LT and BB in the bench-press exercise (p < 0.001). Moreover, the analysis of the linear regression on the Bland-Altman plots showed that the differences between the LT and BW (R-2 = 0.004-0.03), BB (R-2 = 0.007-0.01), and the app (R-2 = 0.001-0.03) were similar across the whole range of velocities analyzed. Finally, the reliability of the BW (ICC = 0.910-0.988), BB (ICC = 0.922-0.990), and the app (ICC = 0.928-0.989) for the measurement of the two repetitions performed with each load were almost the same than that observed with the LT (ICC = 0.937-0.990). Both the Beast wearable device and the PowerLift app were highly valid, reliable, and accurate for the measurement of barbell velocity in the bench-press, full-squat, and hip-thrust exercises. These results could have potential practical applications for strength and conditioning coaches who wish to measure barbell velocity during resistance training.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] Reliability of technologies to measure the barbell velocity: Implications for monitoring resistance training
    Martinez-Cava, Alejandro
    Hernandez-Belmonte, Alejandro
    Courel-Ibanez, Javier
    Moran-Navarro, Ricardo
    Gonzalez-Badillo, Juan Jose
    Pallares, Jesus G.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (06):
  • [2] Reproducibility and Repeatability of Five Different Technologies for Bar Velocity Measurement in Resistance Training
    Javier Courel-Ibáñez
    Alejandro Martínez-Cava
    Ricardo Morán-Navarro
    Pablo Escribano-Peñas
    Javier Chavarren-Cabrero
    Juan José González-Badillo
    Jesús G. Pallarés
    [J]. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 2019, 47 : 1523 - 1538
  • [3] Reproducibility and Repeatability of Five Different Technologies for Bar Velocity Measurement in Resistance Training
    Courel-Ibanez, Javier
    Martinez-Cava, Alejandro
    Moran-Navarro, Ricardo
    Escribano-Penas, Pablo
    Chavarren-Cabrero, Javier
    Gonzalez-Badillo, Juan Jost
    Pallares, Jesus G.
    [J]. ANNALS OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2019, 47 (07) : 1523 - 1538
  • [4] Implementing a velocity-based approach to resistance training: the reproducibility and sensitivity of different velocity monitoring technologies
    Ivan Jukic
    Andrew King
    Colby A. Sousa
    Katarina Prnjak
    Michael R. McGuigan
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 13
  • [5] Implementing a velocity-based approach to resistance training: the reproducibility and sensitivity of different velocity monitoring technologies
    Jukic, Ivan
    King, Andrew
    Sousa, Colby A.
    Prnjak, Katarina
    McGuigan, Michael R.
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01)
  • [6] The Criterion Validity and Between-Day Reliability of the Perch for Measuring Barbell Velocity During Commonly Used Resistance Training Exercises
    Weakley, Jonathon
    Munteanu, Gabriella
    Cowley, Nicholas
    Johnston, Rich
    Morrison, Matthew
    Gardiner, Carissa
    Perez-Castilla, Alejandro
    Garcia-Ramos, Amador
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH, 2023, 37 (04) : 787 - 792
  • [7] Reliability of technologies to measure the barbell velocity: Implications for monitoring resistance training (vol 15, e0232465, 2020)
    Martinez-Cava, Alejandro
    Hernandez-Belmonte, Alejandro
    Courel-Ibanez, Javier
    Moran-Navarro, Ricardo
    Gonzalez-Badillo, Juan Jose
    Pallares, Jesus G.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (07):
  • [8] Criterion Validity, and Interunit and Between-Day Reliability of the FLEX for Measuring Barbell Velocity During Commonly Used Resistance Training Exercises
    Weakley, Jonathon
    Chalkley, Daniel
    Johnston, Rich
    Garcia-Ramos, Amador
    Townshend, Andrew
    Dorrell, Harry
    Pearson, Madison
    Morrison, Matthew
    Cole, Michael
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH, 2020, 34 (06) : 1519 - 1524
  • [9] Smartphone-Based Video Analysis for Guiding Shoulder Therapeutic Exercises: Concurrent Validity for Movement Quality Control
    Lopes, Maria
    Melo, Ana S. C.
    Cunha, Bruno
    Sousa, Andreia S. P.
    [J]. APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2023, 13 (22):
  • [10] Effects of a Smartphone-Based Wearable Telerehabilitation System for In-Home Dynamic Weight-Shifting Balance Exercises by Individuals with Parkinson's Disease
    An, Junmo
    Kim, Jiyeon
    Lai, Eugene C.
    Lee, Beom-Chan
    [J]. 42ND ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCES OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY: ENABLING INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES FOR GLOBAL HEALTHCARE EMBC'20, 2020, : 5678 - 5681