Effect of interpregnancy interval on outcomes of pregnancy after miscarriage: retrospective analysis of hospital episode statistics in Scotland

被引:62
|
作者
Love, Eleanor R. [2 ]
Bhattacharya, Siladitya [2 ]
Smith, Norman C. [3 ]
Bhattacharya, Sohinee [1 ]
机构
[1] Aberdeen Matern Hosp, Dugald Baird Ctr Res Womens Hlth, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, Scotland
[2] Univ Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland
[3] Aberdeen Matern Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, Scotland
来源
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL | 2010年 / 341卷
关键词
LOW-BIRTH-WEIGHT; SPONTANEOUS-ABORTION; SUBSEQUENT PREGNANCY; PERINATAL OUTCOMES; PRETERM DELIVERY; WOMEN; RISK; HEALTH; GRIEF;
D O I
10.1136/bmj.c3967
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To determine the optimum interpregnancy interval after miscarriage in a first recorded pregnancy. Design Population based retrospective cohort study. Setting Scottish hospitals between 1981 and 2000. Participants 30 937 women who had a miscarriage in their first recorded pregnancy and subsequently became pregnant. Main outcome measures The primary end point was miscarriage, live birth, termination, stillbirth, or ectopic pregnancy in the second pregnancy. Secondary outcomes were rates of caesarean section and preterm delivery, low birthweight infants, pre-eclampsia, placenta praevia, placental abruption, and induced labour in the second pregnancy. Results Compared with women with an interpregnancy interval of 6-12 months, those who conceived again within six months were less likely to have another miscarriage (adjusted odds ratio 0.66, 95% confidence interval 0.57 to 0.77), termination (0.43, 0.33 to 0.57), or ectopic pregnancy (0.48, 0.34 to 0.69). Women with an interpregnancy interval of more than 24 months were more likely to have an ectopic second pregnancy (1.97, 1.42 to 2.72) or termination (2.40, 1.91 to 3.01). Compared with women with an interpregnancy interval of 6-12 months, women who conceived again within six months and went on to have a live birth in the second pregnancy were less likely to have a caesarean section (0.90, 0.83 to 0.98), preterm delivery (0.89, 0.81 to 0.98), or infant of low birth weight (0.84, 0.71 to 0.89) but were more likely to have an induced labour (1.08, 1.02 to 1.23). Conclusions Women who conceive within six months of an initial miscarriage have the best reproductive outcomes and lowest complication rates in a subsequent pregnancy.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Effect of interpregnancy interval on adverse pregnancy outcomes in northern Tanzania: a registry-based retrospective cohort study
    Michael J. Mahande
    Joseph Obure
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 16
  • [22] Interpregnancy Interval After Termination of Pregnancy and the Risks of Adverse Outcomes in Subsequent Birth
    Mannisto, Jaana
    Bloigu, Aini
    Mentula, Maarit
    Gissler, Mika
    Heikinheimo, Oskari
    Niinimaki, Maarit
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 129 (02): : 347 - 354
  • [23] Effect of interpregnancy interval after a first pregnancy complicated by placental abruption, on adverse maternal and fetal outcomes in a second pregnancy
    Rohde, Rebecca L.
    Luong, Lan
    Adjei Boakye, Eric
    Chang, Jen Jen
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2020, 33 (22): : 3809 - 3815
  • [24] The influence of birth outcomes and pregnancy complications on interpregnancy interval: a quantile regression analysis
    Gebremedhin, Amanuel T.
    Regan, Annette K.
    Haberg, Siri E.
    Marinovich, M. Luke
    Tessema, Gizachew A.
    Pereira, Gavin
    ANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2023, 85 : 108 - +
  • [25] Short Interpregnancy Interval After Pregnancy Loss Is Associated with Decreased Risk of Subsequent Miscarriage in a Prospective Cohort.
    Sundermann, Alexandra C.
    Hartmann, Katherine E.
    Jones, Sarah H.
    Torstenson, Eric S.
    Edwards, Digna R. Velez
    REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCES, 2017, 24 : 84A - 84A
  • [26] Interpregnancy Interval After Clinical Pregnancy Loss and Outcomes of the Next Frozen Embryo Transfer
    Wang, Ze
    Meng, Yueru
    Shang, Xue
    Suo, Lu
    Zhao, Dingying
    Han, Xinwei
    Yang, Min
    Yin, Mengfei
    Miao, Haozhe
    Wang, Yixuan
    Yang, Huiming
    Yu, Yunhai
    Wei, Daimin
    Chen, Zi-Jiang
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2023, 6 (10) : E2340709
  • [27] Interpregnancy Interval After Termination of Pregnancy and the Risks of Adverse Outcomes in Subsequent Birth Reply
    Mannisto, Jaana
    Bloigu, Aini
    Mentula, Maarit
    Gissler, Mika
    Heikinheimo, Oskari
    Niinimaki, Maarit
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 129 (05): : 944 - 945
  • [28] The effect of Massachusetts health reform on 30 day hospital readmissions: retrospective analysis of hospital episode statistics
    Lasser, Karen E.
    Hanchate, Amresh D.
    McCormick, Danny
    Manze, Meredith G.
    Chu, Chieh
    Kressin, Nancy R.
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2014, 348
  • [29] The effect of short interpregnancy interval on birthweight and other pregnancy outcomes in Enugu, Southeast Nigeria
    Nnaji, Henry C.
    Asimadu, Eric E.
    Aniebue, Uzochukwu U.
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2022, 42 (02) : 244 - 247
  • [30] Short interpregnancy interval can lead to adverse pregnancy outcomes: A meta-analysis
    Wang, Yumei
    Zeng, Can
    Chen, Yuhong
    Yang, Liu
    Tian, Di
    Liu, Xinghui
    Lin, Yonghong
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2022, 9