Hand preference for the visual and auditory modalities in humans

被引:4
|
作者
Yang, Yuqian [1 ]
Weiss, Peter H. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Fink, Gereon R. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Chen, Qi [1 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Res Ctr Julich, Inst Neurosci & Med INM 3, Cognit Neurosci, Wilhelm Johnen Str, D-52428 Julich, Germany
[2] Univ Hosp Cologne, Dept Neurol, D-50937 Cologne, Germany
[3] Univ Cologne, Fac Med, D-50937 Cologne, Germany
[4] South China Normal Univ, Ctr Studies Psychol Applicat, Guangzhou 510631, Peoples R China
[5] South China Normal Univ, Sch Psychol, Guangzhou 510631, Peoples R China
[6] South China Normal Univ, Minist Educ, Key Lab Brain Cognit & Educ Sci, Guangzhou 510631, Peoples R China
关键词
SENSORIMOTOR; CORTEX; HANDEDNESS; ATTENTION; ASYMMETRIES; COMPETITION; DOMINANCE; PATHWAY;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-021-87396-4
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The sensory dominance effect refers to the phenomenon that one sensory modality more frequently receives preferential processing (and eventually dominates consciousness and behavior) over and above other modalities. On the other hand, hand dominance is an innate aspect of the human motor system. To investigate how the sensory dominance effect interacts with hand dominance, we applied the adapted Colavita paradigm and recruited a large cohort of healthy right-handed participants (n=119). While the visual dominance effect in bimodal trials was observed for the whole group (n=119), about half of the right-handers (48%) showed a visual preference, i.e., their dominant hand effect manifested in responding to the visual stimuli. By contrast, 39% of the right-handers exhibited an auditory preference, i.e., the dominant hand effect occurred for the auditory responses. The remaining participants (13%) did not show any dominant hand preference for either visual or auditory responses. For the first time, the current behavioral data revealed that human beings possess a characteristic and persistent preferential link between different sensory modalities and the dominant vs. non-dominant hand. Whenever this preferential link between the sensory and the motor system was adopted, one dominance effect peaks upon the other dominance effect's best performance.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparing Visual and Auditory Modalities in an Online Intentional Binding Task
    Prinsen, Ruby
    Singhal, Anthony
    Hayward, Dana A.
    PERCEPTION, 2021, 50 (1_SUPPL) : 86 - 87
  • [32] The development of children's visual and auditory modalities in reality monitoring
    Guo, XJ
    Su, YJ
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 39 (5-6) : 564 - 565
  • [33] Testing the unique internal representation across the visual and auditory modalities
    Gorea, A
    Sagi, D
    PERCEPTION, 2002, 31 : 148 - 148
  • [34] An fMRI Study of Affective Congruence across Visual and Auditory Modalities
    Gao, Chuanji
    Weber, Christine E.
    Wedell, Douglas H.
    Shinkareva, Svetlana V.
    JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2020, 32 (07) : 1251 - 1262
  • [35] The influence of time structure on prediction motion in visual and auditory modalities
    Kuiyuan Qin
    Wenxiang Chen
    Jiayu Cui
    Xiaoyu Zeng
    Ying Li
    Yuan Li
    Xuqun You
    Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 2022, 84 : 1994 - 2001
  • [36] Fixation Preference for Visual and Auditory Targets in Monkeys with Strabismus
    Ramachandran, Santoshi
    Das, Vallabh E.
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2020, 61 (11)
  • [38] No association between adult sex steroids and hand preference in humans
    Richardson, Thomas
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN BIOLOGY, 2022, 34 (02)
  • [39] Comparisons of Auditory, Audiovisual, and Visual Modalities in Feature Domain for Auditory Brain-Computer Interfaces
    Choi, Yun-Joo
    Kim, Minju
    Kim, Jongsu
    Heo, Dojin
    Kim, Sung-Phil
    2021 21ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONTROL, AUTOMATION AND SYSTEMS (ICCAS 2021), 2021, : 2021 - 2027
  • [40] Auditory intensity effects on visual - auditory integration in the control of eye and hand movements
    Arndt, P. A.
    Colonius, H.
    PERCEPTION, 2000, 29 : 90 - 90