Intravenous acetaminophen does not reduce morphine use for pain relief in emergency department patients: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

被引:6
|
作者
Minotti, Bruno [1 ]
Mansella, Gregory [2 ]
Sieber, Robert [1 ]
Ott, Alexander [3 ]
Nickel, Christian H. [2 ]
Bingisser, Roland [2 ]
机构
[1] Cantonal Hosp St Gallen, Emergency Dept, Rorschacherstr 95, CH-9007 St Gallen, Switzerland
[2] Univ Basel, Univ Hosp Basel, Emergency Dept, Basel, Switzerland
[3] Cantonal Hosp St Gallen, Interdisciplinary Pain Ctr, St Gallen, Switzerland
关键词
HYDROMORPHONE TITRATION PROTOCOL; CLINICAL-TRIAL; OPIOIDS; MG/KG; CARE;
D O I
10.1111/acem.14517
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background Pain is one of the main reasons to present to emergency departments (EDs). Opioids are indispensable for acute pain management but are associated with side effects, misuse, and dependence. The aim of this study was to test whether a single dose of intravenous (IV) acetaminophen (paracetamol) can reduce the use of morphine for pain relief and/or morphine-related adverse events (AEs). Methods ED patients >18 years with acute pain (i.e., Numeric Rating Scale [NRS] > 4) were screened for eligibility. Patients with analgesia in the past 6 h, chronic pain, or clinical instability were excluded. Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either morphine 0.1 mg/kg and 1 g acetaminophen IV or morphine 0.1 mg/kg and placebo IV. The intervention was double-blinded. Additional morphine 0.05 mg/kg IV was administered every 15 minutes until pain relief (defined as NRS < 4) and whether the pain recurred. The primary outcome was the mean morphine dose for pain relief. Secondary outcomes were the total amount of morphine given, time to achieve pain relief, and AEs. Results A total of 220 patients were randomized and 202 evaluated for the primary outcome. The mean morphine dose for pain relief was similar in both groups (acetaminophen 0.15 mg +/- 0.07 mg/kg, placebo 0.16 +/- 0.07 mg/kg). There were no differences in the total amount of morphine given (acetaminophen 0.19 +/- 0.09 mg/kg, placebo 0.19 +/- 0.1 mg/kg), the time to achieve pain relief (acetaminophen 30 min [95% CI 17-31 min], placebo 30 min [95% CI 30-35 min]), and the frequency of AEs (overall 27.4%). Time to pain recurrence did not differ significantly between the groups (hazard ratio 1.23 [0.76-1.98], p = 0.40). Conclusions In ED patients, acetaminophen had no additional effect on pain control or morphine-sparing effect at the time of first morphine administration. Titrated morphine with the algorithm used was highly effective, with 80% of all patients reporting pain relief within 60 min of starting therapy.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:954 / 962
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] DIAZEPAM AND MECLIZINE ARE EQUALLY EFFECTIVE IN THE TREATMENT OF VERTIGO: AN EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT RANDOMIZED DOUBLE-BLIND PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL
    Shih, Richard D.
    Walsh, Brian
    Eskin, Barnet
    Allegra, John
    Fiesseler, Frederick W.
    Salo, Dave
    Silverman, Michael
    JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2017, 52 (01): : 23 - 27
  • [42] Intravenous Lidocaine for Effective Pain Relief after Inguinal Herniorrhaphy: a Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study
    Kang, H.
    Kim, B-G
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2011, 39 (02) : 435 - 445
  • [43] Intravenous Lidocaine for Effective Pain Relief After a Laparoscopic Colectomy: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study
    Ahn, EunJin
    Kang, Hyun
    Choi, Geun Joo
    Park, Yong Hee
    Yang, So Young
    Kim, Beom Gyu
    Choi, Seung Won
    INTERNATIONAL SURGERY, 2015, 100 (03) : 394 - 401
  • [44] Gabapentin does not reduce post-thoracotomy shoulder pain: a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled study
    Huot, Marie-Pierre
    Chouinard, Philippe
    Girard, Francois
    Ruel, Monique
    Lafontaine, Edwin R.
    Ferraro, Pasquale
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 2008, 55 (06): : 337 - 343
  • [45] Effects of Omeprazole on Sleep Disturbance: Randomized Multicenter Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial
    Aimi, Masahito
    Komazawa, Yoshinori
    Hamamoto, Naoharu
    Yamane, Yuko
    Furuta, Koichiro
    Uchida, Yasushi
    Yano, Shozo
    Morita, Miwa
    Oguro, Hiroaki
    Miyake, Tatsuya
    Sugimoto, Toshitsugu
    Nagi, Seiichi
    Naora, Kohji
    Goubaru, Yoshiyuki
    Ishihara, Shunji
    Kinoshita, Yoshikazu
    CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 5
  • [46] Adalimumab in Severe and Acute Sciatica A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial
    Genevay, Stephane
    Viatte, Sebastien
    Finckh, Axel
    Zufferey, Pascal
    Balague, Federico
    Gabay, Cem
    ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 2010, 62 (08): : 2339 - 2346
  • [47] A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of valproate for agitation associated with dementia
    Tariot, PN
    Thal, L
    Jakimovich, L
    Thomas, R
    Raman, R
    NEUROBIOLOGY OF AGING, 2004, 25 : S189 - S189
  • [48] A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial to Evaluate Intravenous Acetaminophen Versus Placebo in Patients Undergoing Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy
    Wang, Victor C.
    Preston, Mark A.
    Kibel, Adam S.
    Xu, Xinling
    Gosnell, James
    Yong, R. Jason
    Urman, Richard D.
    JOURNAL OF PAIN & PALLIATIVE CARE PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2018, 32 (2-3) : 82 - 89
  • [49] Sublingual immunotherapy for peanut allergy: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter trial
    Fleischer, David M.
    Burks, A. Wesley
    Vickery, Brian P.
    Scurlock, Amy M.
    Wood, Robert A.
    Jones, Stacie M.
    Sicherer, Scott H.
    Liu, Andrew H.
    Stablein, Donald
    Henning, Alice K.
    Mayer, Lloyd
    Lindblad, Robert
    Plaut, Marshall
    Sampson, Hugh A.
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2013, 131 (01) : 119 - U184
  • [50] Multicenter randomized double-blind placebo-controlled glucosamine discontinuation trial in osteoarthritis.
    Cibere, J
    Esdaile, JM
    Thorne, A
    Singer, J
    Kopec, JA
    Canvin, J
    Robinson, DB
    Pope, J
    Hong, P
    Grant, E
    Ionescu, M
    Poole, AR
    ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 2002, 46 (09): : S576 - S577