TRENDS IN U.S. FACE-TO-FACE HOUSEHOLD SURVEY NONRESPONSE AND LEVEL OF EFFORT

被引:81
|
作者
Williams, Douglas [1 ]
Brick, J. Michael [1 ]
机构
[1] Westat Corp, 1600 Res Blvd, Rockville, MD 20850 USA
关键词
Face to face; Level of effort; Re-interview; Response rates; PANEL SURVEYS; RATES; ATTRITION; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1093/jssam/smx019
中图分类号
O1 [数学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
Research on nonresponse in face-to-face surveys in the United States has shown that nonresponse increases over time for most surveys, but there are also periods of fairly stable rates. Surprisingly, nonresponse for face-to-face surveys has not been as widely studied recently as compared to telephone surveys. The focus on telephone surveys may be due to the dramatic increase in nonresponse for these surveys or perhaps because face-to-face surveys still achieve relatively high levels of response. This paper updates nonresponse trends for face-to-face household surveys conducted in the United States since 2000. The review provides a comprehensive picture of the industry by including surveys conducted by government, private, and academic organizations. The relative role of refusals and noncontacts in the total nonresponse is also presented. We tie the trends in nonresponse with data on the level of effort for some of these surveys. Many researchers have suggested that extra effort has been needed to prevent response rates from falling even more precipitously but lacked the effort data to evaluate this hypothesis for face-to-face surveys. Some data on field effort are becoming available, so this question can be addressed for the first time across more than one survey. To complete the picture, we also look at loss over time for longitudinal face-to-face surveys.
引用
收藏
页码:186 / 211
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Patient Satisfaction with Anaesthesia: Perioperative Questionnaire versus Face-to-face Survey
    George, Mathew
    Kiran, N.
    Ravi, M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2023, 17 (01) : UC10 - UC16
  • [42] Combining Face-to-face Therapy with Computerized Techniques: A therapists' Attitudes Survey
    Shalom, Jonathan G.
    Israel, Roee
    Shalom, Nira
    [J]. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 2015, 219 : 69 - 74
  • [43] Comparison of an online survey and face-to-face interviews for eliciting societal preferences
    Rowen, Donna
    Brazier, John E.
    Keetharuth, Anju
    Tsuchiya, Aki
    Robinson, Angela
    Mukuria, Clara
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2014, 23 : 49 - 49
  • [44] The influence of interviewers' contact behavior on the contact and cooperation rate in face-to-face household surveys
    Blohm, Michael
    Hox, Joop
    Koch, Achim
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC OPINION RESEARCH, 2007, 19 (01) : 97 - 111
  • [45] U.S. firms could face stiffer European threat
    Anon
    [J]. Aviation Week and Space Technology (New York), 2001, 155 (24):
  • [46] THE CHANGING FACE OF U.S. LABOR, 1983-2008
    Schmitt, John
    Warner, Kris
    [J]. WORKING USA-THE JOURNAL OF LABOR AND SOCIETY, 2010, 13 (02): : 263 - 279
  • [47] MOODLE IN BLENDED AND FACE-TO-FACE INTERACTIVE TEACHING OF ENGLISH AT THE UNIVERSITY LEVEL
    Gomez Rey, Inmaculada
    Hernandez Garcia, Emilio
    Rico Garcia, Mercedes
    [J]. RIED-REVISTA IBEROAMERICANA DE EDUCACION A DISTANCIA, 2009, 12 (01): : 169 - 193
  • [48] Improving Data Quality in Face-to-Face Survey Research (Oct, 10.1017/S1049096519001161, 2019)
    Logan, Carolyn
    Paras, Pablo
    Robbins, Michael
    Zechmeister, Elizabeth J.
    [J]. PS-POLITICAL SCIENCE & POLITICS, 2021, 54 (02) : 395 - 395
  • [49] Online versus face-to-face learning: looking at modes of instruction in Master's-level courses
    Ferguson, Janet
    Tryjankowski, Anne Marie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FURTHER AND HIGHER EDUCATION, 2009, 33 (03) : 219 - 228
  • [50] On Mothers and Spiders: A face-to-face encounter with Argentina's mourning
    Sosa, Cecilia
    [J]. MEMORY STUDIES, 2011, 4 (01) : 63 - 72