Video and text feedback on ESL writing: Understanding ATTITUDE and negotiating relationshipS

被引:13
|
作者
Cunningham, Kelly J. [1 ]
Link, Stephanie [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Virginia, Grad Writing Lab, Sch Engn & Appl Sci, POB 400242,351 McCormick Rd, Charlottesville, VA 22904 USA
[2] Oklahoma State Univ, Dept English, 205 Morrill Hall, Stillwater, OK 74078 USA
关键词
Computer-mediated feedback; Instructor feedback; Screencast feedback; Systemic functional linguistics; APPRAISAL framework; ATTITUDE analysis; APPRAISAL; STUDENTS; TECHNOLOGY; ENGAGEMENT; DISCOURSE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jslw.2021.100797
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
Technology enables multiple modalities (e.g., audio, video, and text) for providing feedback on students' writing. As interest in technology-mediated feedback grows, it is important to consider how different modalities can impact instructors' evaluative language choices. These choices can influence student emotions and student-instructor relationships. Thus, a better understanding of language use across feedback modes can provide insight into how interpersonal considerations can be negotiated in feedback. In this study, we explore how video and text impact language choices in the formative feedback of three instructors in US university ESL writing courses. Feedback on 136 essays was analyzed using the APPRAISAL framework, with a focus on ATTITUDE. This analysis provides a nuanced, linguistically grounded understanding and description of how evaluation is conveyed, while highlighting the social or interpersonal aspects of language within the communicative context of responding to student writing. Text feedback was found to be more negative, while video offered more balance and showed greater concern for social relationships in the feedback process. Finer grain analysis suggested that instructors may engage with students differently across feedback modes, prompting future possibilities for instructor training.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Effects of Online Feedback on ESL/EFL Writing: A Meta-Analysis
    Lv, Xiaoxuan
    Ren, Wei
    Xie, Yue
    ASIA-PACIFIC EDUCATION RESEARCHER, 2021, 30 (06): : 643 - 653
  • [22] The Effects of Implicit Written Corrective Feedback on ESL Learners' Writing Skills
    Subon, Frankie
    Ali, Nurul Amira
    JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE AND EDUCATION, 2022, 8 (04): : 153 - 167
  • [23] Arab ESL Secondary School Students' Attitude Toward English Spelling and Writing
    Al-Sobhi, Bandar
    Rashid, Sabariah Md
    Abdullah, Ain Nadzimah
    SAGE OPEN, 2018, 8 (01):
  • [24] Discovery Through Writing: Relationships with Writing Processes and Text Quality
    Baaijen, Veerle M.
    Galbraith, David
    COGNITION AND INSTRUCTION, 2018, 36 (03) : 199 - 223
  • [25] Negotiating Relationships at the Writing Center: Removing Roadblocks and Building Bridges
    Brooks-Gillies, Marilee
    Moore, Grace Rosenbarger
    COLLEGE COMPOSITION AND COMMUNICATION, 2024, 75 (03) : 558 - 584
  • [26] The Effects of Coded Focused and Unfocused Corrective Feedback on ESL Student Writing Accuracy
    Deng, Chunrao
    Wang, Xiang
    Lin, Shuyang
    Xuan, Wenhui
    Xie, Qin
    JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE AND EDUCATION, 2022, 8 (04): : 36 - 57
  • [27] Impact of Written Corrective Feedback on Malaysian ESL Secondary Students' Writing Performance
    Ganapathy, Malini
    Tan, Debbita Ai Lin
    Phan, Jonathan
    3L-LANGUAGE LINGUISTICS LITERATURE-THE SOUTHEAST ASIAN JOURNAL OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE STUDIES, 2020, 26 (03): : 139 - 153
  • [28] The Effects of Oral and Written Meta-Linguistic Feedback on ESL Students Writing
    Mansourizadeh, Kobra
    Abdullah, Khairi Izwan
    3L-LANGUAGE LINGUISTICS LITERATURE-THE SOUTHEAST ASIAN JOURNAL OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE STUDIES, 2014, 20 (02): : 117 - 126
  • [29] Understanding and Providing 'Cohesive' and 'Coherent' Feedback on Writing
    Mahboob, Ahmar
    WRITING & PEDAGOGY, 2015, 7 (2-3): : 355 - 376
  • [30] Social contracts for writing: Negotiating shared understandings about text in the preschool years
    Rowe, Deborah Wells
    READING RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 2008, 43 (01) : 66 - 95