Assessment of microbial diversity in four southwestern United States soils by 16S rRNA gene terminal restriction fragment analysis

被引:303
|
作者
Dunbar, J
Ticknor, LO
Kuske, CR
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Alamos Natl Lab, Environm Mol Biol Grp, Biosci Div, Los Alamos, NM 87545 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Alamos Natl Lab, Technol & Safety Assessment Div, Los Alamos, NM 87545 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1128/AEM.66.7.2943-2950.2000
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
The ability of terminal restriction fragment (T-RFLP or TRF) profiles of 165 rRNA genes to provide useful information about the relative diversity of complex microbial communities was investigated by comparison with other methods. Four soil communities representing two pinyon rhizosphere and two between-tree (interspace) soil environments were compared by analysis of 16S rRNA gene clone libraries and culture collections (Dunbar et al., Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65:1662-1669, 1998) and by analysis of 16S rDNA TRF profiles of community DNA. The TRF method was able to differentiate the four communities in a manner consistent with previous comparisons of the communities by analysis of 16S rDNA clone libraries. TRF profiles were not useful for calculating and comparing traditional community richness or evenness values among the four soil environments. Statistics calculated from RsaI, NhaI, HaeIII, and MspI profiles of each community were inconsistent, and the combined data were not significantly different between samples. The detection sensitivity of the method was tested. In standard PCRs, a seeded population comprising 0.1 to 1% of the total community could be detected. The combined results demonstrate that TRF analysis is an excellent method for rapidly comparing the relationships between bacterial communities in environmental samples. However, for highly complex communities, the method appears unable to provide classical measures of relative community diversity.
引用
收藏
页码:2943 / 2950
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条