Extended criteria donors for robotic right hepatectomy: A propensity score matched analysis

被引:10
|
作者
Varghese, Christi Titus [1 ]
Chandran, Biju [1 ]
Gopalakrishnan, Unnikrishnan [1 ]
Nair, Krishnanunni [1 ]
Mallick, Shweta [1 ]
Mathew, Johns Shaji [1 ]
Amma, Binoj Sivasankara Pillai Thankamony [1 ]
Balakrishnan, Dinesh [1 ]
Vayoth, Sudheer Othiyil [1 ]
Sudhindran, Surendran [1 ]
机构
[1] Amrita Inst Med Sci & Res Ctr, Dept Gastrointestinal Surg & Solid Organ Transpla, Kochi, Kerala, India
关键词
living donors; hepatectomy; liver transplantation; minimally invasive surgery; robot-assisted surgery; LIVER-TRANSPLANTATION; PURE; COMPLICATIONS;
D O I
10.1002/jhbp.1145
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Robotic right donor hepatectomy (RDH) has been reported from experienced centers with reduced morbidity when compared to open RDH. However, outcomes in donors with large grafts/complex biliovascular anatomy are unknown. Methods Out of 170 robotic RDH, 100 had one or more of the following: graft weight >= 800 g, type 2/3 portal vein, >1 bile duct or hepatic artery and inferior hepatic veins >5 mm requiring reconstruction (extended criteria donors [ExRDH]), while the remaining 70 had standard anatomy (SRDH). After propensity score matching, 66 ExRDH were compared with 66 SRDH. Additionally, all robotic RDH performed were analyzed in three temporal phases (60, 60, and 50). Results Peak AST and ALT were higher amongst donors and recipients in the ExRDH arm compared to SRDH. Other intraoperative parameters and postoperative complications were similar between the two groups. During the last phase, donors demonstrated reduction in duration of surgery, postoperative complications, and hospital stay while recipients showed decreased blood loss and hospital stay. Conclusion Robotic right hepatectomy performed in donors with extended criteria have similar perioperative outcomes as standard donors. However, a significant learning curve needs to be traversed. Further studies are required before safely recommending robotic RDH for all donors.
引用
收藏
页码:874 / 883
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Robotic Extended Right Hepatectomy for Colorectal Liver Metastasis
    Newton, Andrew D.
    Newhook, Timothy E.
    Ikoma, Naruhiko
    Tzeng, Ching-Wei D.
    Chun, Yun Shin
    Vauthey, Jean-Nicolas
    Cao, Hop S. Tran
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 29 (13) : 8455 - 8455
  • [42] Open vs Robotic Hepatectomy: Propensity-matched Analysis by Case Complexity at a Single Institution
    Klein, Brandon
    Holzner, Matthew L.
    Llore, Nathaly
    Radkani, Pejman
    Winslow, Emily
    Hawksworth, Jason Solomon
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2023, 236 (05) : S64 - S64
  • [43] Intraoperative cell salvage with autologous transfusion in elective right or repeat hepatectomy: a propensity-score-matched case-control analysis
    Zacharias, Thomas
    Ahlschwede, Erich
    Dufour, Nicole
    Romain, Florence
    Theissen-Laval, Odile
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 61 (02) : 105 - 113
  • [44] Pure laparoscopic versus conventional open living donor right hepatectomy using a propensity score matched analysis: challenge to 0% of complication
    Choi, J. U.
    Kim, K. -H
    Lee, S. -G
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2019, 103 (08) : 198 - 198
  • [45] Safety and Risk Factors of Pure Laparoscopic Living Donor Right Hepatectomy: Comparison to Open Technique in Propensity Score-matched Analysis
    Park, Jungchan
    Kwon, David Choon Hyuck
    Choi, Gyu-Seong
    Kim, Sung Joo
    Lee, Suk-Koo
    Kim, Jong Man
    Lee, Kyo Won
    Chung, Young Jae
    Kim, Kyeong Sik
    Lee, Ji Soo
    Rhu, Jinsoo
    Kim, Gaab Soo
    Gwak, Mi Sook
    Ko, Justin Sangwook
    Lee, Ja Eun
    Lee, SeungHwan
    Joh, Jae-Won
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2019, 103 (10) : E308 - E316
  • [46] Minimally invasive versus open right anterior sectionectomy and central hepatectomy for central liver malignancies: a propensity-score-matched analysis
    Chin, Ken Min
    Linn, Yun-Le
    Cheong, Chin Kai
    Koh, Ye-Xin
    Teo, Jin-Yao
    Chung, Alexander Y. F.
    Chan, Chung Yip
    Goh, Brian K. P.
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 91 (04) : E174 - E182
  • [47] Concerns Regarding Robotic vs Laparoscopic Right and Extended Right Hepatectomy
    Qian, Xinye
    Hu, Wang
    Yan, Jun
    JAMA SURGERY, 2022, 157 (10) : 964 - 964
  • [48] Cost analysis and financial implications of robotic and open pancreatoduodenectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis
    Abreu, Andres A.
    Farah, Emile
    Meier, Jennie
    Kannan, Amudhan
    Buckley, James
    Zhang, Liquing
    Mansour, John
    Porembka, Matthew R.
    Ethun, Cecilia G.
    Yopp, Adam
    Zeh, Herbert J., III
    Polanco, Patricio M.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 31 (01) : S186 - S187
  • [49] Does Metabolic Syndrome Effect the Perioperative Course and Costs of Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Undergoing Robotic Hepatectomy? A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis
    Rayman, Shlomi
    Sucandy, Iswanto
    Ross, Sharona B.
    Crespo, Kaitlyn
    Syblis, Cameron
    App, Samantha
    Rosemurgy, Alexander
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 2022, 88 (09) : 2108 - 2114
  • [50] National Trends and Perioperative Outcomes of Robotic-assisted Hepatectomy in the USA: A Propensity-score Matched Analysis from the National Cancer Database
    Mohamed K. Kamel
    Faiz Tuma
    Charles A. Keane
    John Blebea
    World Journal of Surgery, 2022, 46 : 189 - 196