Reduction of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli in Poultry Skin by Fruit Extracts

被引:23
|
作者
Valtierra-Rodriguez, Diana [1 ]
Heredia, Norma L. [1 ]
Garcia, Santos [1 ]
Sanchez, Eduardo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Autonoma Nuevo Leon, Fac Ciencias Biol, San Nicolas De Los Garza 66451, NL, Mexico
关键词
ANTIMICROBIAL ACTIVITY; ENTEROTOXIN PRODUCTION; TRISODIUM PHOSPHATE; BROTH MICRODILUTION; BROILER CARCASSES; MEDICINAL-PLANTS; ESSENTIAL OILS; CHICKEN SKIN; IN-VITRO; SPP;
D O I
10.4315/0362-028X-73.3.477
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Campylobacter spp. are a major cause of foodborne bacterial gastroenteritis in humans, and current methods to control Campylobacter contamination in foods are not completely successful. Plants are a promising source of antimicrobial agents, particularly given the growing interest in "all natural" foods. In this study, the antimicrobial activity of extracts from 28 edible plants against Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli was evaluated in vitro and in a poultry skin model. Nine of 28 extracts exhibited antimicrobial activity in a diffusion assay, and MBCs were determined for the three most active extracts, i.e., lime, plum, and Sour orange peel (MBCs of 2 to 3 mg/ml). Mixtures of the lime, plum, and sour orange peel extracts were applied to chicken skin inoculated with 10(5) CFU of Campylobacter to test for synergistic or antagonist effects. After incubation (48 h at 4 degrees C) with any extract mixture, no Campylobacter CFUs were detectable. A panel of tasters determined that the mixture of lime and plum gave the best flavor to chicken wings. These active extracts from edible fruits are simple to prepare and are alternatives to reduce or eliminate Campylobacter contamination of chicken products.
引用
收藏
页码:477 / 482
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Phenotypic and genotypic methods for typing Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli in poultry
    Eberle, K. N.
    Kiess, A. S.
    [J]. POULTRY SCIENCE, 2012, 91 (01) : 255 - 264
  • [2] Antimicrobial Resistance of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli from Poultry in Italy
    Giacomelli, Martina
    Salata, Cristiano
    Martini, Marco
    Montesissa, Clara
    Piccirillo, Alessandra
    [J]. MICROBIAL DRUG RESISTANCE, 2014, 20 (02) : 181 - 188
  • [3] Enrichment Broth for the Detection of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli in Fresh Produce and Poultry
    Jo, Youmi
    Oh, Hye-Min
    Yoon, Yohan
    Lee, Sun-Young
    Ha, Ji-Hyoung
    Kim, Won-Il
    Kim, Hwang-Yong
    Han, Sanghyun
    Kim, Se-Ri
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION, 2017, 80 (11) : 1842 - 1850
  • [4] Serotypes and typability of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli isolated from poultry products
    Nielsen, EM
    Nielsen, NL
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD MICROBIOLOGY, 1999, 46 (03) : 199 - 205
  • [5] PCR-ELISAs for the detection of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli in poultry samples
    Grennan, B
    O'Sullivan, NA
    Fallon, R
    Carroll, C
    Smith, T
    Glennon, M
    Maher, M
    [J]. BIOTECHNIQUES, 2001, 30 (03) : 602 - +
  • [6] METHODS FOR DETECTING AND ENUMERATING CAMPYLOBACTER-JEJUNI AND CAMPYLOBACTER-COLI IN POULTRY
    BEUCHAT, LR
    [J]. POULTRY SCIENCE, 1986, 65 (12) : 2192 - 2198
  • [7] PROCEDURES FOR THE ISOLATION OF CAMPYLOBACTER-JEJUNI AND CAMPYLOBACTER-COLI FROM POULTRY
    FRICKER, CR
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD MICROBIOLOGY, 1984, 1 (03) : 149 - 154
  • [8] Comparison of three culture media for recovering Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli from poultry skin, liver and meat
    Manzano, M
    Pipan, C
    Botta, G
    Comi, G
    [J]. SCIENCES DES ALIMENTS, 1995, 15 (06) : 615 - 623
  • [9] The Evolution of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli
    Sheppard, Samuel K.
    Maiden, Martin C. J.
    [J]. COLD SPRING HARBOR PERSPECTIVES IN BIOLOGY, 2015, 7 (08):
  • [10] A CONTRIBUTION TO THE EPIDEMIOLOGY OF CAMPYLOBACTER-JEJUNI AND CAMPYLOBACTER-COLI IN POULTRY MEAT PRODUCTION
    HOOP, R
    EHRSAM, H
    [J]. SCHWEIZER ARCHIV FUR TIERHEILKUNDE, 1987, 129 (04): : 193 - 203