Validity of sentinel lymph node biopsy in Taiwanese breast cancer patients

被引:6
|
作者
Liu, Tse-Jia
机构
[1] Taipei Med Univ, Municipal Wan Fang Hosp, Dept Surg, Taipei, Taiwan
[2] Taipei Med Univ, Taoyuan Vet Hosp, Vreast Canc Soc Taiwan, Taipei, Taiwan
关键词
breast cancer; false negative rate; sentinel lymph node;
D O I
10.1016/S0929-6646(09)60228-X
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background/Purpose: The clinical validity of sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy in Taiwanese breast cancer patients from 16 institutes in two consecutive periods was analyzed. Methods: Data from the initial period between January 3, 1999 and July 2004 and data from the later period after August 2004 to February 2005 were compared. Data on the use of a tracer, SLN identification, harvest and examination, false negative rate (FNR) and the number of patients spared axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) were analyzed. Results: A total of 3308 patients with clinical axilla negative breast cancer underwent SLN biopsies in 16 hospitals (11 in both periods and 5 in the period before August 2004). Comparison of data from the two periods revealed that in the later period, use of combined blue dye and isotope tracer increased from 40% to 80%, the 95% SLN biopsy success rate increased from 50% to 80%, hospitals conducting intraoperative SLN examination increased from 80% to 93%, and the 95% match to permanent section rate increased from 30% to 80%. In the initial period, eight hospitals had less than 7% FNR, while in the later period this had decreased to 4.1 % in these hospitals. Another three hospitals had FNR greater than 7% in the initial period, which had decreased to 0% in the later period. Hospitals with more than 100 cases of SLN biopsy had an average 3.8% FNR, whereas hospitals with less than 100 cases of SLN biopsy experience had an 8.2% FNR (p < 0.01). Conclusion: This study found that the SLN biopsy success rate increased after the use of combined tracers and with experience. FNR was controlled to within 5% among breast surgeons with accumulated experience exceeding 100 cases. It is recommended that ALND-sparing surgery be suspended temporarily in hospitals with FNR greater than 5%.
引用
收藏
页码:126 / 133
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer
    Kühn, T
    GEBURTSHILFE UND FRAUENHEILKUNDE, 2006, 66 (03) : 313 - 314
  • [22] Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer
    Fortunato, Lucio
    Mascaro, Alessandra
    Amim, Mostafa
    Farina, Massimo
    Vitelli, Carlo Eugenio
    SURGICAL ONCOLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2008, 17 (03) : 673 - +
  • [23] Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer
    Genc, Volkan
    Ensari, Cemal
    Seker, Duray
    Kulacoglu, Hakan
    JOURNAL OF BREAST HEALTH, 2008, 4 (01): : 2 - 2
  • [24] Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer [Sentinel lymph node beim mammakarzinom]
    Rody A.
    Solbach C.
    Kaufmann M.
    Der Chirurg, 2004, 75 (8): : 767 - 773
  • [25] Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer in patients with previous breast surgery
    Orozco-Cortes, J.
    Diaz-Exposito, R.
    Casans-Tormo, I.
    Prado-Wohlwend, S.
    Bowles-Aantelo, H.
    Caballero-Garate, A.
    Almarcha-Gimeno, A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2015, 42 : S626 - S626
  • [26] Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer: The node to recovery
    Goyal A.
    Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology, 2010, 1 (1) : 10 - 13
  • [27] Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with breast cancer
    Cox, CE
    Bass, SS
    McCann, CR
    Ku, NNK
    Berman, C
    Durand, K
    Bolano, M
    Wang, J
    Peltz, E
    Cox, S
    Salud, C
    Reintgen, DS
    Lyman, GH
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF MEDICINE, 2000, 51 : 525 - 542
  • [28] LYMPHATIC MAPPING AND SENTINEL LYMPH NODE BIOPSY IN THE PATIENTS WITH BREAST CANCER
    刘国津
    范志民
    唐强
    杨明
    付彤
    张宏
    宋冬
    Chinese Journal of Cancer Research, 2000, (04) : 293 - 295
  • [30] Lymphatic Mapping and Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Breast Cancer Patients
    Newman, Lisa A.
    JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY PRACTICE, 2005, 1 (04) : 130 - 133