A learning curve analysis of ultrasound-guided in-plane and out-of-plane vascular access training with Perk Tutor

被引:1
|
作者
Xia, Sean [1 ,2 ]
Keri, Zsuzsanna [1 ]
Holden, Matthew S. [1 ]
Hisey, Rebecca [1 ]
Lia, Hillary [1 ]
Ungi, Tamas [1 ]
Mitchell, Christopher H. [3 ]
Fichtinger, Gabor [1 ]
机构
[1] Queens Univ, Sch Comp, Lab Percutaneous Surg, Kingston, ON, Canada
[2] Queens Univ, Sch Med, Kingston, ON, Canada
[3] Sir Charles Gairdner Hosp, Dept Anaesthesia, Perth, WA, Australia
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会; 加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
Perk Tutor; 3D Slicer; PLUS Toolkit; Image-Guided Intervention; Ultrasound-guided needle insertion; Learning curve analysis; Procedural skills education; Competency-based medical education; LUMBAR PUNCTURE; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1117/12.2293789
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: Under ultrasound guidance, procedures that have been traditionally performed using landmark approaches have become safer and more efficient. However, inexperienced trainees struggle with coordinating probe handling and needle insertion. We aimed to establish learning curves to identify the rate of acquisition of in-plane and out-of-plane vascular access skill in novice medical trainees. METHODS: Thirty-eight novice participants were randomly assigned to perform either in-plane or out-of-plane insertions. Participants underwent baseline testing, four practice insertions (with 3D visualization assistance), and final testing; performance metrics were computed for all procedures. Five expert participants performed insertions in both approaches to establish expert performance metric benchmarks. RESULTS: In-plane novices (n=19) demonstrated significant final reductions in needle path inefficiency (45.8 vs. 127.1, p<0.05), needle path length (41.1 mm vs. 58.0 mm. p<0.05). probe path length (11.6 mm vs. 43.8 mm. p<0.01). and maximal distance between needle and ultrasound plane (3.1 mm vs. 5.5 mm, p<0.05) and surpassed expert benchmarks in average and maximal rotational error. Out-of-plane novices (n=19) demonstrated significant final reductions in all performance metrics, including needle path inefficiency (54.4 vs. 1102, p<0.0 1). maximum distance of needle past plane (0.0 mm vs. 7.3 mm, p<0.01). and total time of needle past plane (0.0 s vs. 3.4 s, p<0.01) and surpassed expert benchmarks in maximum distance and time of needle past plane. CONCLUSION: Our learning curves quantify improvement in in-plane and out-of-plane vascular access skill with 3D visualization over multiple attempts. The training session enables more than half of novices to approach expert performance benchmarks.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Training with Perk Tutor improves ultrasound-guided in-plane needle insertion skill
    Lia, Hillary
    Keri, Zsuzsanna
    Holden, Matthew S.
    Harish, Vinyas
    Mitchell, Christopher H.
    Ungi, Tamas
    Fichtinger, Gabor
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2017: IMAGE-GUIDED PROCEDURES, ROBOTIC INTERVENTIONS, AND MODELING, 2017, 10135
  • [2] Ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block: the in-plane versus out-of-plane approach
    Chin, Ki Jinn
    Chan, Vincent W. S.
    van Geffen, Geert Jan
    PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, 2008, 18 (12) : 1279 - 1280
  • [3] Effects of long axis in-plane vs short axis out-of-plane techniques during ultrasound-guided vascular access
    Gao, Yan-Bing
    Yan, Jun-Hong
    Ma, Jian-Min
    Liu, Xiao-Na
    Dong, Jing-Yun
    Sun, Fang
    Tang, Li-Wei
    Li, Jie
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2016, 34 (05): : 778 - 783
  • [4] Ultrasound-guided femoral catheter placement: a randomised comparison of the in-plane and out-of-plane techniques
    Fredrickson, M. J.
    Danesh-Clough, T. K.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2013, 68 (04) : 382 - 390
  • [5] Ultrasound-Guided Out-of-Plane Versus In-Plane Radial Artery Cannulation in Adult Cardiac Surgical Patients
    Arora, Nishant Ram
    Maddali, Madan Mohan
    Al-Sheheimi, Rashid Ahmed Rashid
    Al-Mughairi, Hajer
    Panchatcharam, Sathiya Murthi
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2021, 35 (01) : 84 - 88
  • [6] Ultrasound-guided out-of-plane obturator nerve block
    Ishiyama, T.
    Kotoda, M.
    Asano, N.
    Ikemoto, K.
    Masamune, T.
    Matsukawa, T.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2013, 68 (10) : 1074 - 1075
  • [7] The arcTOA Technique for Out-of-Plane Ultrasound-Guided Injections
    Rajasekaran, Sathish
    Finnoff, Jonathan T.
    PM&R, 2016, 8 (07) : 713 - 715
  • [8] Ultrasound-guided radial arterial cannulation: long axis/in-plane versus short axis/out-of-plane approaches?
    Derya Berk
    Yavuz Gurkan
    Alparslan Kus
    Halim Ulugol
    Mine Solak
    Kamil Toker
    Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 2013, 27 : 319 - 324
  • [9] Ultrasound-guided radial arterial cannulation: long axis/in-plane versus short axis/out-of-plane approaches?
    Berk, Derya
    Gurkan, Yavuz
    Kus, Alparslan
    Ulugol, Halim
    Solak, Mine
    Toker, Kamil
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MONITORING AND COMPUTING, 2013, 27 (03) : 319 - 324
  • [10] ANALYSIS OF GUIDED WAVE PROPAGATION BY VISUALIZING IN-PLANE AND OUT-OF-PLANE MODES
    Muhammad, Nor Salim Bin
    Hayashi, Takahiro
    Murase, Morimasa
    Kamiya, Shoji
    REVIEW OF PROGRESS IN QUANTITATIVE NONDESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION, VOLS 28A AND 28B, 2009, 1096 : 774 - 781