Face-to-face vs. Online learning in Engineering Courses

被引:1
|
作者
Guadalupe Garcia-Castelan, Rosa Maria [1 ]
Gonzalez-Nucamendi, Andres [1 ]
Robledo-Rella, Victor [1 ]
Neri, Luis [1 ]
Noguez, Julieta [1 ]
机构
[1] Tecnol Monterrey, Sch Engn & Sci, Mexico City 14380, DF, Mexico
关键词
face-to-face courses; online courses; statistical analysis; educational innovation; higher education; EDUCATION;
D O I
10.1109/FIE49875.2021.9637177
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
After the 2017 earthquake, instruction-at-adistance was massively adopted at Tecnologico de Monterrey Mexico City Campus (CCM). This tragic experience gave CCM staff, faculty, and students truly online expertise, which is now used due to the pandemic. The pros and cons of in-site classes versus online sessions are presented and discussed for engineering courses. A 25-item survey was designed containing categories such as human interaction, command on oneself, and academic performance, among others. A total sample of 396 engineering students was considered. Most students agree that the face-to-face scenario favors their enthusiasm for class attendance, their learning process as well as teacher and peer-to-peer communication. The lack of human contact, the lack of outdoor activities, and the difficulty in making new friends were also factors against education at a distance. Along the same line, distraction, depression, and stress incremented in the online model. However, from the academic point of view, student performance remained similar in the face-to-face model compared to the online model. The teacher's efforts in order to implement active learning activities through novel apps and simulations in the online model were remarkable.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Students perception of videos in introductory physics courses of engineering in face-to-face and online environments
    Perez-Navarro, A.
    Garcia, Victor
    Conesa, Jordi
    [J]. MULTIMEDIA TOOLS AND APPLICATIONS, 2021, 80 (01) : 1009 - 1028
  • [22] Students perception of videos in introductory physics courses of engineering in face-to-face and online environments
    A. Perez-Navarro
    Victor Garcia
    Jordi Conesa
    [J]. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 2021, 80 : 1009 - 1028
  • [23] On-line vs. Face-to-Face Delivery of Information Technology Courses: Students' Assessment
    Said, Hazem
    Kirgis, Lauren
    Verkamp, Brian
    Johnson, Lawrence
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION-RESEARCH, 2015, 14 : 297 - 312
  • [24] Comparative Efficacy of Online vs. Face-to-Face Group Interventions: A Systematic Review
    Rafieifar, Maryam
    Hanbidge, Alice Schmidt
    Lorenzini, Sloan Bruan
    Macgowan, Mark J.
    [J]. RESEARCH ON SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE, 2024,
  • [25] Impact of social anxiety on communication skills in face-to-face vs. online contexts
    Lacombe, Corina
    Elalouf, Karine
    Collin, Charles
    [J]. COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR REPORTS, 2024, 15
  • [26] The use of role-play in the learning of medical terminology for online and face-to-face courses
    del Moral, Brenda L. M.
    VanPutte, Cinnamon L.
    McCracken, Barbara A.
    [J]. ADVANCES IN PHYSIOLOGY EDUCATION, 2024, 48 (03) : 578 - 587
  • [27] Achievement gap in online and hybrid courses versus face-to-face courses among engineering and computer science students
    Zabihian, Farshid
    [J]. 2018 IEEE FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION CONFERENCE (FIE), 2018,
  • [28] Concurrent Offering of Online and Face-to-Face Courses: Synergies and Challenges
    Shapiro, Howard N.
    Starns, Gloria
    [J]. 2014 ASEE ANNUAL CONFERENCE, 2014,
  • [29] Influence of Online and Face-to-Face Wellness Courses on Exercise Participation
    Keefer, Daniel. J.
    Lombardi, Julie A.
    Nesbitt, Gordon M.
    Schaeffer, Stratton C.
    Wimer, Jeffrey W.
    [J]. RESEARCH QUARTERLY FOR EXERCISE AND SPORT, 2009, 80 (01) : A29 - A29
  • [30] E-Learning vs. Face-To-Face Learning: Analyzing Students' Preferences and Behaviors
    Gherhes, Vasile
    Stoian, Claudia E.
    Farcasiu, Marcela Alina
    Stanici, Miroslav
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (08)