Topology optimization considering the distortion in additive manufacturing

被引:23
|
作者
Miki, Takao [1 ]
Yamada, Takayuki [2 ]
机构
[1] Osaka Res Inst Ind Sci & Technol, 7-1,Ayumino 2, Izumi, Osaka 5941157, Japan
[2] Univ Tokyo, Dept Strateg Studies, Inst Engn Innovat, Bunkyo Ku, 11-16,Yayoi 2, Tokyo 1138656, Japan
关键词
Topology optimization; Level set method; Metal additive manufacturing; Inherent strain method; INHERENT STRAIN METHOD; RESIDUAL-STRESSES; STRUCTURAL OPTIMIZATION; EXPERIMENTAL VALIDATION; THERMOMECHANICAL MODEL; PART DISTORTION; LASER; PREDICTION; DEFORMATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.finel.2021.103558
中图分类号
O29 [应用数学];
学科分类号
070104 ;
摘要
Additive manufacturing is a free-form manufacturing technique in which parts are built in a layer-by-layer manner. Laser powder bed fusion is one of the popular techniques used to fabricate metal parts. However, it induces residual stress and distortion during fabrication that adversely affects the mechanical properties and dimensional accuracy of the manufactured parts. Therefore, predicting and avoiding the residual stress and distortion are critical issues. In this study, we propose a topology optimization method that accounts for the distortion. First, we propose a computationally inexpensive analytical model for additive manufacturing that uses laser powder bed fusion and formulated an optimization problem. Next, we approximate the topological derivative of the objective function using an adjoint variable method that is then utilized to update the level set function via a time evolutionary reaction-diffusion equation. Finally, the validity and effectiveness of the proposed optimization method was established using two-dimensional design examples.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] TOPOLOGY OPTIMIZATION FOR ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING CONSIDERING LAYER-BASED MINIMUM FEATURE SIZES
    Osanov, Mikhail
    Guest, James K.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL DESIGN ENGINEERING TECHNICAL CONFERENCES AND COMPUTERS AND INFORMATION IN ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, 2017, VOL 2A, 2017,
  • [22] Three-dimensional high resolution topology optimization considering additive manufacturing constraints
    Zhang, Kaiqing
    Cheng, Gengdong
    ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2020, 35
  • [23] Topology and build orientation optimization for additive manufacturing considering build height and overhang area
    Crispo, Luke
    Kim, Il Yong
    STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2024, 67 (06)
  • [24] An intelligent algorithm for topology optimization in additive manufacturing
    Reza Karimzadeh
    Mohsen Hamedi
    The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2022, 119 : 991 - 1001
  • [25] Morphable components topology optimization for additive manufacturing
    Yeming Xian
    David W. Rosen
    Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2020, 62 : 19 - 39
  • [26] Topology optimization for additive manufacturing of CFRP structures
    Xu, Yanan
    Feng, Zhaoxuan
    Gao, Yunkai
    Wu, Chi
    Fang, Jianguang
    Sun, Guangyong
    Qiu, Na
    Steven, Grant P.
    Li, Qing
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL SCIENCES, 2024, 269
  • [27] Topology optimization subject to additive manufacturing constraints
    Moritz Ebeling-Rump
    Dietmar Hömberg
    Robert Lasarzik
    Thomas Petzold
    Journal of Mathematics in Industry, 11
  • [28] Topology optimization and additive manufacturing for aerospace components
    Laura Berrocal
    Rosario Fernández
    Sergio González
    Antonio Periñán
    Santos Tudela
    Jorge Vilanova
    Luis Rubio
    Jose Manuel Martín Márquez
    Javier Guerrero
    Fernando Lasagni
    Progress in Additive Manufacturing, 2019, 4 : 83 - 95
  • [29] Topology optimization methods for additive manufacturing: a review
    El Khadiri I.
    Zemzami M.
    Nguyen N.-Q.
    Abouelmajd M.
    Hmina N.
    Belhouideg S.
    International Journal for Simulation and Multidisciplinary Design Optimization, 2023, 14
  • [30] Morphable components topology optimization for additive manufacturing
    Xian, Yeming
    Rosen, David W.
    STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2020, 62 (01) : 19 - 39